E.J.F.M. Custers is researcher in medical education, Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. O. ten Cate is professor of medical education, Center for Research and Development of Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3S Competency-Based, Time-Variable Education in the Health Professions):S49-S54. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002079.
In this article, the authors present a historic overview of the development of medical education in the United States and Europe (in particular the Netherlands), as it relates to the issues of time (duration of the course) and proficiency (performance requirements and examinations). This overview is necessarily limited and based largely on post hoc interpretation, as historic data on time frames are not well documented and the issue of competence has only recently been addressed.During times when there were few, if any, formal regulations, physicians were primarily "learned gentlemen" in command of few effective practical skills, and the duration of education and the competencies acquired by the end of a course simply did not appear to be issues of any interest to universities or state authorities. Though uniform criteria gradually developed for undergraduate medical education, postgraduate specialty training remained, before accreditation organizations set regulations, at the discretion of individual institutions and medical societies. This resulted in large variability in training time and acquired competencies between residency programs, which were often judged on the basis of opaque or questionable criteria. Considering the high costs of health care today and the increasing demand for patient safety and educational efficiency, continuing historic models of nonstandardized practices will no longer be feasible. Efforts to constrain, restructure, and individualize training time and licensing tracks to optimize training for safe care, both in the United States and Europe, are needed.
本文介绍了美国和欧洲(尤其是荷兰)医学教育发展的历史概述,重点讨论了时间(课程持续时间)和能力(绩效要求和考试)这两个问题。由于历史数据中关于时间框架的记录并不完善,而且能力问题直到最近才得到关注,因此这种概述必然是有限的,并在很大程度上基于事后解释。在那个时期,几乎没有正式的规定,如果有的话,医生主要是“有学问的绅士”,掌握的实际技能很少,教育的持续时间以及在课程结束时所获得的能力似乎都不是大学或州政府关心的问题。尽管本科医学教育的标准逐渐统一,但在认证机构制定规定之前,研究生专业培训仍然由各个机构和医学协会自行决定。这导致住院医师培训计划之间的培训时间和获得的能力存在很大差异,这些培训计划通常基于不透明或有问题的标准进行评估。考虑到当今医疗保健成本高昂,以及对患者安全和教育效率的需求不断增加,继续沿用非标准化实践的历史模式将不再可行。无论是在美国还是在欧洲,都需要努力限制、重构和个性化培训时间和许可轨道,以优化安全护理培训。