Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, P.O. Box 12200, FI-00076 AALTO, Finland; Aalto NeuroImaging (AMI Centre and MEG Core), Aalto University, FI-00076 AALTO, Finland.
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, P.O. Box 12200, FI-00076 AALTO, Finland.
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:361-369. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.045. Epub 2018 Feb 24.
Movie viewing allows human perception and cognition to be studied in complex, real-life-like situations in a brain-imaging laboratory. Previous studies with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and with magneto- and electroencephalography (MEG and EEG) have demonstrated consistent temporal dynamics of brain activity across movie viewers. However, little is known about the similarities and differences of fMRI and MEG or EEG dynamics during such naturalistic situations. We thus compared MEG and fMRI responses to the same 15-min black-and-white movie in the same eight subjects who watched the movie twice during both MEG and fMRI recordings. We analyzed intra- and intersubject voxel-wise correlations within each imaging modality as well as the correlation of the MEG envelopes and fMRI signals. The fMRI signals showed voxel-wise within- and between-subjects correlations up to r = 0.66 and r = 0.37, respectively, whereas these correlations were clearly weaker for the envelopes of band-pass filtered (7 frequency bands below 100 Hz) MEG signals (within-subjects correlation r < 0.14 and between-subjects r < 0.05). Direct MEG-fMRI voxel-wise correlations were unreliable. Notably, applying a spatial-filtering approach to the MEG data uncovered consistent canonical variates that showed considerably stronger (up to r = 0.25) between-subjects correlations than the univariate voxel-wise analysis. Furthermore, the envelopes of the time courses of these variates up to about 10 Hz showed association with fMRI signals in a general linear model. Similarities between envelopes of MEG canonical variates and fMRI voxel time-courses were seen mostly in occipital, but also in temporal and frontal brain regions, whereas intra- and intersubject correlations for MEG and fMRI separately were strongest only in the occipital areas. In contrast to the conventional univariate analysis, the spatial-filtering approach was able to uncover associations between the MEG envelopes and fMRI time courses, shedding light on the similarities of hemodynamic and electromagnetic brain activities during movie viewing.
电影观看使人类的感知和认知能够在脑成像实验室中复杂的、类似真实生活的情境中进行研究。先前使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和磁和脑电图(MEG 和 EEG)的研究已经证明了在观看电影的过程中,大脑活动的时间动态在不同的电影观看者之间是一致的。然而,对于在这种自然情境下 fMRI 和 MEG 或 EEG 动力学的相似性和差异性知之甚少。因此,我们在八位参与者中比较了 MEG 和 fMRI 对同一部 15 分钟黑白电影的反应,这些参与者在 MEG 和 fMRI 记录期间两次观看了这部电影。我们分析了每个成像模式中的体素内和体素间相关性,以及 MEG 包络和 fMRI 信号的相关性。fMRI 信号显示出体素内和体素间的相关性,最高可达 r=0.66 和 r=0.37,而对于带通滤波(低于 100Hz 的 7 个频带)MEG 信号的包络,这些相关性明显较弱(体素内相关性 r<0.14,体素间 r<0.05)。直接的 MEG-fMRI 体素相关性不可靠。值得注意的是,对 MEG 数据应用空间滤波方法揭示了一致的典型变量,这些变量之间的相关性明显更强(高达 r=0.25),而不是单变量体素分析。此外,这些变量的时间历程的包络在大约 10Hz 处与 fMRI 信号在一般线性模型中表现出关联。MEG 典型变量的包络与 fMRI 体素时间历程之间的相似性主要见于枕部,但也见于颞部和额部脑区,而 MEG 和 fMRI 分别的体素内和体素间相关性仅在枕部最强。与传统的单变量分析相反,空间滤波方法能够揭示 MEG 包络和 fMRI 时间历程之间的关联,为电影观看过程中血流动力学和电磁脑活动的相似性提供了线索。