Sin Minki, Kim Won-Seok, Cho Kyujin, Cho Sungmin, Paik Nam-Jong
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University/IAMD, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2018 Apr;39:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
The conventional tools to measure spasticity exhibited insufficient test-retest or inter-rater reliability. Therefore, the spasticity measurement using an isokinetic device has been proposed to improve these reliabilities of the angle of catch (AoC) measurements; however, this proposal has not been investigated in a standardized manner. In this study, the comparison of the AoC measurement was performed using two modes (isokinetic and manual motion) to investigate whether the standardized isokinetic motion could increase the reliabilities. Motion consistency was calculated using a newly developed index. To analyze the effect of the motion standardization, AoC were estimated using EMG data for both modes, and to compare the measurement reliability, AoC for isokinetic mode was estimated using both EMG and torque data. Although the test-retest reliability for manual motion was excellent, the use of isokinetic motion improved it to the level of extremely excellent. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the inter-rater reliability of manual motion was 0.788, which was near the lower limit of the excellent. Isokinetic motion improved it to the ICC of 0.890 and 0.931 based on the EMG and torque, respectively. These improvements in reliabilities reduced the measurement errors, sample size, and need for the same rater in clinical trials.
传统的痉挛测量工具在重测或评分者间信度方面表现不足。因此,有人提出使用等速装置进行痉挛测量,以提高捕捉角度(AoC)测量的这些信度;然而,这一建议尚未以标准化方式进行研究。在本研究中,使用两种模式(等速运动和手动运动)对AoC测量进行比较,以研究标准化的等速运动是否能提高信度。使用新开发的指标计算运动一致性。为了分析运动标准化的效果,使用两种模式的肌电图数据估计AoC,并为了比较测量信度,使用肌电图和扭矩数据估计等速模式的AoC。虽然手动运动的重测信度极佳,但使用等速运动将其提高到了极其优秀的水平。手动运动评分者间信度的组内相关系数(ICC)为0.788,接近优秀水平的下限。等速运动分别基于肌电图和扭矩将其提高到了0.890和0.931的ICC。这些信度的提高减少了测量误差、样本量以及临床试验中对同一评分者的需求。