18F-FP-CIT与123I-FP-CIT在帕金森病患者多巴胺转运体成像中的头对头比较:一项初步研究。

Head-to-head comparison of F-FP-CIT and I-FP-CIT for dopamine transporter imaging in patients with Parkinson's disease: A preliminary study.

作者信息

Lee Inki, Kim Jin Su, Park Joon Yeun, Byun Byung Hyun, Park Su Yeon, Choi Joon Ho, Moon Hansol, Kim Jung Young, Lee Kyo Chul, Chi Dae Yoon, Kim Kyeong Min, Lim Ilhan, Kang Joo Hyun, Ahn Soon Hyuk, Kim Byung Il, Ha Jeong Ho, Lim Sang Moo

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institutes of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.

Division of RI convergence research, Research Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Korea Institutes of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Synapse. 2018 Jul;72(7):e22032. doi: 10.1002/syn.22032. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

Abstract

I-FP-CIT and F-FP-CIT are radiotracers which are widely used to diagnose Parkinson's disease (PD). However, to our knowledge, no studies to date have made head-to-head comparisons between I-FP-CIT and F-FP-CIT. Therefore, in this study, I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT was compared with F-FP-CIT PET/CT in the same cohort of subjects. Patients with PD and essential tremor (ET) underwent I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT and F-FP-CIT PET/CT. Visual and semiquantitative analyses were conducted. The specific binding ratio (SBR) and putamen to caudate ratio (PCR) were compared between subjects who underwent I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT and F-FP-CIT PET/CT. Visual analysis showed that the striatal uptake of both radiotracers was decreased in the PD group, whereas striatal uptake was intact in the ET group. The SBR between I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT and F-FP-CIT PET/CT showed a positive correlation (r = .78, p < .01). However, the mean SBRs on F-FP-CIT PET/CT were higher than those on I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT (2.19 ± .87 and 1.22 ± .49, respectively; p < .01). The PCRs in these two modalities were correlated with each other (r = .71, p < .01). The mean PCRs on F-FP-CIT PET/CT were not significantly higher than those on I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT (1.31 ± .19 and 0.98 ± .06, respectively; p = .06). These preliminary results indicate that the uptake of both I-FP-CIT and F-FP-CIT was decreased in the PD group when compared with the ET controls. Visual analyses using both methods did not affect the diagnostic accuracy in this study. However, semiquantitative analysis indicated a better contrast of F-FP-CIT PET/CT relative to I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT.

摘要

I-FP-CIT和F-FP-CIT是广泛用于诊断帕金森病(PD)的放射性示踪剂。然而,据我们所知,迄今为止尚无研究对I-FP-CIT和F-FP-CIT进行直接比较。因此,在本研究中,在同一组受试者中对I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT和F-FP-CIT PET/CT进行了比较。帕金森病和特发性震颤(ET)患者接受了I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT和F-FP-CIT PET/CT检查。进行了视觉和半定量分析。比较了接受I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT和F-FP-CIT PET/CT检查的受试者之间的特异性结合率(SBR)和壳核与尾状核比率(PCR)。视觉分析显示,在帕金森病组中,两种放射性示踪剂的纹状体摄取均降低,而在特发性震颤组中纹状体摄取完整。I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT和F-FP-CIT PET/CT之间的SBR呈正相关(r = 0.78,p <0.01)。然而,F-FP-CIT PET/CT上的平均SBR高于I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT上的平均SBR(分别为2.19±0.87和1.22±0.49;p <0.01)。这两种检查方式中的PCR相互相关(r = 0.71,p <0.01)。F-FP-CIT PET/CT上的平均PCR并不显著高于I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT上的平均PCR(分别为1.31±0.19和0.98±0.06;p = 0.06)。这些初步结果表明,与特发性震颤对照组相比,帕金森病组中I-FP-CIT和F-FP-CIT的摄取均降低。在本研究中,使用这两种方法进行的视觉分析均未影响诊断准确性。然而,半定量分析表明,相对于I-FP-CIT SPECT/CT,F-FP-CIT PET/CT具有更好的对比度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索