Global Health Innovations Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi, India.
Reprod Health. 2018 Feb 27;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0482-y.
The sex composition of existing children has been shown to influence childbearing decision-making and behaviors of women and couples. One aspect of this influence is the preference for sons. In India, where son preference is deeply entrenched, research has normally focused on rural areas using cross-sectional data. However, urban areas in India are rapidly changing, with profound implications for childbearing patterns. Yet, evidence on the effect of the sex composition of current children on subsequent childbearing intentions and behavior in urban areas is scant. In this study, we analyze the impact of sex composition of children on subsequent (1) parity progression, (2) contraceptive use, and (3) desire for another child.
We analyze prospective data from women over a four year period in urban Uttar Pradesh using discrete-time event history logistic regression models to analyze parity progression from the first to second parity, second to third parity, and third to fourth parity. We also use logistic regression models to analyze contraceptive use and desire for another child.
Relative to women with no daughters, women with no sons had significantly higher odds of progressing to the next birth (parity 1 - aOR: 1.31; CI: 1.04-1.66; parity 2 - aOR: 4.65; CI: 3.11-6.93; parity 3 - aOR:3.45; CI: 1.83-6.52), as well as reduced odds of using contraception (parity 2 - aOR:.58; CI: .44-.76; parity 3 - aOR: .58; CI: .35-.98). Relative to women with two or more sons, women with two or more daughters had significantly higher odds of wanting to have another child (parity 1 - aOR: 1.33; CI: 1.06-1.67; parity 2 - aOR: 3.96; CI: 2.45-6.41; parity 3-4.89; CI: 2.22-10.77).
Our study demonstrates the pervasiveness of son preference in urban areas of Uttar Pradesh. We discuss these findings for future programmatic strategies to mitigate son preference in urban settings.
现有子女的性别构成已被证明会影响女性和夫妇的生育决策和行为。这种影响的一个方面是对儿子的偏好。在印度,重男轻女根深蒂固,研究通常集中在使用横截面数据的农村地区。然而,印度的城市地区正在迅速变化,这对生育模式产生了深远的影响。然而,关于现有子女的性别构成对城市地区随后的生育意愿和行为的影响的证据很少。在这项研究中,我们分析了子女性别构成对随后(1)生育进程、(2)避孕措施使用和(3)生育另一孩子的愿望的影响。
我们使用离散时间事件历史逻辑回归模型,对在城市北方邦的妇女进行了为期四年的前瞻性数据分析,以分析从第一胎到第二胎、第二胎到第三胎和第三胎到第四胎的生育进程。我们还使用逻辑回归模型分析避孕措施的使用和生育另一孩子的愿望。
与没有女儿的妇女相比,没有儿子的妇女生育下一胎的几率显著更高(生育 1 - aOR:1.31;CI:1.04-1.66;生育 2 - aOR:4.65;CI:3.11-6.93;生育 3 - aOR:3.45;CI:1.83-6.52),同时使用避孕措施的几率也更低(生育 2 - aOR:.58;CI:.44-.76;生育 3 - aOR:.58;CI:.35-.98)。与有两个或更多儿子的妇女相比,有两个或更多女儿的妇女想要生育另一孩子的几率显著更高(生育 1 - aOR:1.33;CI:1.06-1.67;生育 2 - aOR:3.96;CI:2.45-6.41;生育 3-4 - aOR:4.89;CI:2.22-10.77)。
我们的研究表明,重男轻女在北方邦城市地区普遍存在。我们为未来的方案策略讨论了这些发现,以减轻城市环境中的重男轻女现象。