Suppr超能文献

CAPOX 对比 FOLFOX 在 III 期结肠癌辅助治疗中的生存影响。

Survival Impact of CAPOX Versus FOLFOX in the Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Colon Cancer.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Department of Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Jun;17(2):156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) are both used in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer, and while their efficacy is assumed to be similar, they have not been directly compared. We reviewed the toxicity profiles, relative dose intensity (RDI), and survival associated with these regimens across a multi-institutional cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 394 consecutively treated patients with stage III colon cancer who received an oxaliplatin-containing regimen. RDI was defined as the total dose received divided by the intended total dose if all cycles were received.

RESULTS

FOLFOX was associated with increased mucositis (6.2% vs. 0.7%, P = .0069) and neutropenia (25.9% vs. 8.6%, P < .0001), while CAPOX was associated with increased dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (90.7% vs. 80.2%, P = .0055), diarrhea (31.8% vs. 9.0%, P < .0001), and hand-foot syndrome (19.9% vs. 2.1%, P < .0001). Higher median RDI of fluoropyrimidine (93.7% vs. 80.0%, P < .0001) and oxaliplatin (87.2% vs. 76.3%, P < .0001) was noted for patients receiving FOLFOX. Reducing the duration from 6 to 3 months would have prevented 28.7% of FOLFOX and 20.5% of CAPOX patients from ever experiencing a DLT (P = .0008). Overall survival did not differ by regimen (hazard ratio = 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.22; P = .24). However, CAPOX was associated with improved disease-free survival (3-year disease-free survival 83.8% vs. 73.4%, P = .022), which remained significant in high-risk (T4 or N2) (P = .039) but not low-risk patients (P = .19).

CONCLUSION

CAPOX may be associated with improved disease-free survival despite greater toxicities and lower RDI. Reducing adjuvant chemotherapy duration to 3 months would prevent 26% of patients from ever experiencing a DLT.

摘要

背景

卡培他滨和奥沙利铂(CAPOX)与亚叶酸、氟尿嘧啶和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)均用于结肠癌的辅助治疗,虽然它们的疗效被认为是相似的,但尚未进行直接比较。我们在一个多机构队列中比较了这些方案的毒性谱、相对剂量强度(RDI)和生存情况。

患者和方法

我们确定了 394 例连续接受 III 期结肠癌治疗的患者,他们接受了含奥沙利铂的方案。RDI 定义为如果接受所有周期,则总剂量与预期总剂量之比。

结果

FOLFOX 与更高的粘膜炎(6.2% vs. 0.7%,P =.0069)和中性粒细胞减少症(25.9% vs. 8.6%,P <.0001)相关,而 CAPOX 与更高的剂量限制毒性(DLT)(90.7% vs. 80.2%,P =.0055)、腹泻(31.8% vs. 9.0%,P <.0001)和手足综合征(19.9% vs. 2.1%,P <.0001)相关。接受 FOLFOX 的患者的氟嘧啶(93.7% vs. 80.0%,P <.0001)和奥沙利铂(87.2% vs. 76.3%,P <.0001)的中位 RDI 更高。将治疗时间从 6 个月缩短至 3 个月,将使 28.7%的 FOLFOX 和 20.5%的 CAPOX 患者免于发生 DLT(P =.0008)。治疗方案之间的总生存无差异(风险比=0.73;95%置信区间 0.45-1.22;P =.24)。然而,CAPOX 与改善无病生存相关(3 年无病生存率 83.8% vs. 73.4%,P =.022),在高危(T4 或 N2)(P =.039)但不在低危患者(P =.19)中仍具有显著意义。

结论

尽管 CAPOX 毒性更大且 RDI 较低,但仍可能与改善无病生存率相关。将辅助化疗时间缩短至 3 个月,可使 26%的患者免于发生 DLT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验