Madan Karan, Mohan Anant, Agarwal Ritesh, Hadda Vijay, Khilnani Gopi C, Guleria Randeep
Department of Pulmonary Medicine and Sleep Disorders, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Lung India. 2018 Mar-Apr;35(2):98-107. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_417_17.
There is a lack of contemporaneous data on the practices of flexible bronchoscopy in India.
The aim of the study was to study the prevalent practices of flexible bronchoscopy across India.
The "Indian Bronchoscopy Survey" was a 98-question, online survey structured into the following sections: general information, patient preparation and monitoring, sedation and topical anesthesia, procedural/technical aspects, and bronchoscope disinfection/staff protection.
Responses from 669 bronchoscopists (mean age: 40.2 years, 91.8% adult pulmonologists) were available for analysis. Approximately, 70,000 flexible bronchoscopy examinations had been performed over the preceding year. A majority (59%) of bronchoscopists were performing bronchoscopy without sedation. A large number (45%) of bronchoscopists had learned the procedure outside of their fellowship training. About 55% used anticholinergic premedication either as a routine or occasionally. Nebulized lignocaine was being used by 72%, while 24% utilized transtracheal administration of lignocaine. The most commonly (75%) used concentration of lignocaine was 2%. Midazolam with or without fentanyl was the preferred agent for intravenous sedation. The use of video bronchoscope was common (80.8%). The most common (94%) route for performing bronchoscopy was nasal. Conventional transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) was being performed by 74%, while 92% and 78% performed endobronchial and transbronchial lung biopsy, respectively. Therapeutic airway interventions (stents, electrocautery, cryotherapy, and others) were being performed by 30%, while endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and rigid bronchoscopy were performed by 27% and 19.5%, respectively.
There is a wide national variation in the practices of performing flexible bronchoscopy. However, there has been a considerable improvement in bronchoscopy practices compared to previous national surveys.
印度缺乏关于柔性支气管镜检查实践的同期数据。
本研究旨在调查印度各地柔性支气管镜检查的普遍做法。
“印度支气管镜检查调查”是一项包含98个问题的在线调查,分为以下几个部分:一般信息、患者准备与监测、镇静与局部麻醉、操作/技术方面以及支气管镜消毒/工作人员防护。
有669名支气管镜检查医师(平均年龄:40.2岁,91.8%为成人肺科医生)的回复可供分析。在前一年中,大约进行了70000例柔性支气管镜检查。大多数(59%)支气管镜检查医师在无镇静的情况下进行支气管镜检查。大量(45%)支气管镜检查医师是在 fellowship培训之外学习该操作的。约55%的人常规或偶尔使用抗胆碱能药物进行术前用药。72%的人使用雾化利多卡因,而24%的人采用经气管给予利多卡因。最常用(75%)的利多卡因浓度为2%。咪达唑仑加或不加芬太尼是静脉镇静的首选药物。视频支气管镜的使用很普遍(80.8%)。进行支气管镜检查最常见(94%)的途径是经鼻。74%的人进行传统经支气管针吸活检(TBNA),而分别有92%和78%的人进行支气管内和经支气管肺活检。30%的人进行治疗性气道干预(支架置入、电灼、冷冻治疗等),而分别有27%和19.5%的人进行支气管内超声引导经支气管针吸活检(EBUS-TBNA)和硬质支气管镜检查。
在进行柔性支气管镜检查的实践方面,全国存在很大差异。然而,与之前的全国性调查相比,支气管镜检查实践有了相当大的改进。