Suppr超能文献

印度支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)的实践调查

A Survey of Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) practices in India.

作者信息

Madan Karan, Mittal Saurabh, Tiwari Pawan, Hadda Vijay, Mohan Anant, Guleria Randeep

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Lung India. 2022 May-Jun;39(3):234-241. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_497_21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data on the prevalent practices of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in India.

AIM

To study the current practices of EBUS-TBNA in India.

METHODS

This survey was an online questionnaire designed on the Google forms interface. The survey included various questions related to demographics, sedation, analgesia and anesthesia, technical aspects, and infection control related to the procedure of EBUS-TBNA.

RESULTS

Data from 134 respondents (mean age: 42.2 years) were analyzed. Most (97.8%) were pulmonologists or physicians, and a majority (94.8%) practicing in either a private multi-specialty setting or medical college. 40.3% had received procedure training at a formal training program. Mild/moderate sedation was the most common strategy (70.1%). Midazolam (76.7%), Fentanyl (76.0%), followed by propofol (46.5%), were the most frequent drugs, and 82.8% preferred combination sedation. 26.1% used cricothyroid lignocaine injection, and the use of 1% or 2% lignocaine for spray-as-you-go administration was similar. The oral route was preferred, while the laryngeal mask airway was the most common airway conduit under general anesthesia. Suspected granulomatous mediastinal lymphadenopathy (TB/sarcoidosis) (67.2%), followed by lung cancer (32.8%), were the most common indications of EBUS-TBNA. 81.3% performed EBUS-TBNA for lung cancer staging. 21 G needle was preferred (64.9%), and vacuum suction was common (80.6%). 55.2% routinely performed ROSE. Alcohol fixed glass slide smears were the most common method (93.1%) for cytological preparation. 49.3% also performed EUS-B-FNA. 76.9% routinely obtained endo bronchial biopsy and transbronchial lung biopsy in patients with suspected sarcoidosis. Elastography was infrequently used. Nearly three-fourths (77.6%) reused EBUS needles.

CONCLUSION

There is practice variability in the multiple aspects related technical performance of EBUS-TBNA. Evidence-based guidelines addressing the multiple technical aspects are required to standardize the practice of EBUS-TBNA.

摘要

背景

在印度,缺乏关于支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)普遍应用情况的数据。

目的

研究印度目前EBUS-TBNA的应用情况。

方法

本次调查是在谷歌表单界面设计的在线问卷。调查包括与人口统计学、镇静、镇痛和麻醉、技术方面以及与EBUS-TBNA操作相关的感染控制等各种问题。

结果

分析了134名受访者(平均年龄:42.2岁)的数据。大多数(97.8%)是肺科医生或内科医生,大多数(94.8%)在私立多专科机构或医学院工作。40.3%在正式培训项目中接受过该操作培训。轻度/中度镇静是最常见的策略(70.1%)。咪达唑仑(76.7%)、芬太尼(76.0%),其次是丙泊酚(46.5%),是最常用的药物,82.8%倾向于联合镇静。26.1%使用环甲膜利多卡因注射,边走边喷使用1%或2%利多卡因的情况相似。口服途径是首选,而喉罩气道是全身麻醉下最常用的气道导管。疑似肉芽肿性纵隔淋巴结病(结核病/结节病)(67.2%),其次是肺癌(32.8%),是EBUS-TBNA最常见的适应证。81.3%进行EBUS-TBNA用于肺癌分期。首选21G针(64.9%),负压吸引很常见(80.6%)。55.2%常规进行现场快速评估(ROSE)。酒精固定玻片涂片是最常见的细胞学标本制备方法(93.1%)。49.3%也进行超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检(EUS-B-FNA)。76.9%在疑似结节病患者中常规进行支气管内活检和经支气管肺活检。弹性成像很少使用。近四分之三(77.6%)重复使用EBUS针。

结论

EBUS-TBNA的技术操作在多个方面存在实践差异。需要基于证据的指南来规范EBUS-TBNA的操作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d42b/9200193/a201c39245d9/LI-39-234-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验