Beeler Jeff A, Mourra Devry
Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.
CUNY Neuroscience Consortium, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2018 Feb 13;12:6. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00006. eCollection 2018.
Five years ago, we introduced the thrift hypothesis of dopamine (DA), suggesting that the primary role of DA in adaptive behavior is regulating behavioral energy expenditure to match the prevailing economic conditions of the environment. Here we elaborate that hypothesis with several new ideas. First, we introduce the concept of affordability, suggesting that costs must necessarily be evaluated with respect to the availability of resources to the organism, which computes a value not only for the potential reward opportunity, but also the value of resources expended. Placing both costs and benefits within the context of the larger economy in which the animal is functioning requires consideration of the different timescales against which to compute resource availability, or average reward rate. Appropriate windows of computation for tracking resources requires corresponding neural substrates that operate on these different timescales. In discussing temporal patterns of DA signaling, we focus on a neglected form of DA plasticity and adaptation, changes in the physical substrate of the DA system itself, such as up- and down-regulation of receptors or release probability. We argue that changes in the DA substrate itself fundamentally alter its computational function, which we propose mediates adaptations to longer temporal horizons and economic conditions. In developing our hypothesis, we focus on DA D2 receptors (D2R), arguing that D2R implements a form of "cost control" in response to the environmental economy, serving as the "brain's comptroller". We propose that the balance between the direct and indirect pathway, regulated by relative expression of D1 and D2 DA receptors, implements affordability. Finally, as we review data, we discuss limitations in current approaches that impede fully investigating the proposed hypothesis and highlight alternative, more semi-naturalistic strategies more conducive to neuroeconomic investigations on the role of DA in adaptive behavior.
五年前,我们提出了多巴胺(DA)的节俭假说,认为DA在适应性行为中的主要作用是调节行为能量消耗,以匹配环境中当前的经济状况。在此,我们用几个新观点对该假说进行阐述。首先,我们引入了可承受性的概念,表明必须根据生物体可获得的资源来评估成本,这不仅计算潜在奖励机会的价值,还计算所消耗资源的价值。将成本和收益置于动物所处的更大经济背景中,需要考虑计算资源可用性或平均奖励率的不同时间尺度。追踪资源的适当计算窗口需要在这些不同时间尺度上运行的相应神经基质。在讨论DA信号的时间模式时,我们关注一种被忽视的DA可塑性和适应性形式,即DA系统本身物理基质的变化,如受体的上调和下调或释放概率的变化。我们认为,DA基质本身的变化从根本上改变了其计算功能,我们提出这介导了对更长时间范围和经济状况的适应。在发展我们的假说时,我们聚焦于DA D2受体(D2R),认为D2R响应环境经济实施一种“成本控制”形式,充当“大脑的主计长”。我们提出,由D1和D2 DA受体的相对表达调节的直接和间接通路之间的平衡实现了可承受性。最后,在回顾数据时,我们讨论了当前方法中阻碍充分研究该假说的局限性,并强调了更有利于对DA在适应性行为中的作用进行神经经济学研究的替代性、更接近自然的策略。