• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

方法比较:一个用于评估方法比较研究中偏差和精度的 R 包。

MethodCompare: An R package to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies.

机构信息

1 Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

2 Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2557-2565. doi: 10.1177/0962280218759693. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1177/0962280218759693
PMID:29488448
Abstract

Bland and Altman's limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative trait. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods are different, limits of agreement can be misleading. MethodCompare is an R package that implements a new statistical methodology, developed by Taffé in 2016. MethodCompare produces three new plots, the "bias plot", the "precision plot", and the "comparison plot" to visually evaluate the performance of the new measurement method against the reference method. The method is illustrated on three simulated examples. Note that the Taffé method assumes that there are several measurements from reference standard and possibly as few as one measurement from the new method for each individual.

摘要

Bland 和 Altman 的协议界限在许多临床研究中被用来评估两种测量定量特征的方法之间的一致性。然而,当两种方法的测量误差方差不同时,协议界限可能会产生误导。MethodCompare 是一个 R 包,它实现了 Taffé 在 2016 年开发的一种新的统计方法。MethodCompare 生成了三个新的图,即“偏差图”、“精度图”和“比较图”,以直观地评估新测量方法相对于参考方法的性能。该方法在三个模拟示例中进行了说明。请注意,Taffé 方法假设对于每个个体,参考标准有多次测量,而新方法可能只有一次测量。

相似文献

1
MethodCompare: An R package to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies.方法比较:一个用于评估方法比较研究中偏差和精度的 R 包。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2557-2565. doi: 10.1177/0962280218759693. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
2
Effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies.评估方法比较研究中偏倚和精度的有效方案。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1650-1660. doi: 10.1177/0962280216666667. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
3
A new statistical methodology overcame the defects of the Bland-Altman method.一种新的统计方法克服了 Bland-Altman 方法的缺陷。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;124:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
4
Bland and Altman agreement method: to plot differences against means or differences against standard? An endless tale? Bland-Altman 一致性检验方法:差值与均值作图,还是差值与标准值作图?一个永无止境的故事?
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Sep 6;62(2):262-269. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0306. Print 2024 Jan 26.
5
Is the Bland-Altman plot method useful without inferences for accuracy, precision, and agreement? Bland-Altman 图法是否可在不进行准确性、精密度和一致性推断的情况下使用?
Rev Saude Publica. 2024 Feb 19;58:01. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2024058005430. eCollection 2024.
6
Assessing bias, precision, and agreement in method comparison studies.评估方法比较研究中的偏倚、精度和一致性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):778-796. doi: 10.1177/0962280219844535. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
How to regress and predict in a Bland-Altman plot? Review and contribution based on tolerance intervals and correlated-errors-in-variables models.如何在布兰德-奥特曼图中进行回归和预测?基于容忍区间和变量相关误差模型的综述与贡献。
Stat Med. 2016 Jun 30;35(14):2328-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.6872. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
8
Assessing agreement between two measurement systems: An alternative to the limits of agreement approach.评估两种测量系统之间的一致性:一致性界限法的替代方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):2487-2504. doi: 10.1177/0962280215601133. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
9
When can the Bland & Altman limits of agreement method be used and when it should not be used. Bland- Altman 可接受限法何时可以使用,何时不应该使用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
Testing the agreement of medical instruments: overestimation of bias in the Bland-Altman analysis.检测医疗器械的一致性: Bland-Altman 分析中偏倚的高估。
Prev Med. 2013;57 Suppl:S80-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Utilizing saliva for non-invasive detection of exercise-induced myocardial injury with point-of-care cardiac troponin-I.利用唾液通过即时检测心肌肌钙蛋白I对运动诱发的心肌损伤进行无创检测。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 26;15(1):27283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12380-1.
2
Revisiting Depression Rating Scales: Analysis of a Randomized Trial.重新审视抑郁评定量表:一项随机试验的分析
Cureus. 2024 Oct 13;16(10):e71346. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71346. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Critical appraisal of the CLSI guideline EP09c "measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples".
对美国临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)EP09c指南“使用患者样本进行测量程序比较和偏差估计”的批判性评价。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2024 Aug 19;63(3):507-514. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2024-0595. Print 2025 Feb 25.
4
Formal Assessment of Agreement and Similarity between an Open-Source and a Reference Industrial Device with an Application to a Low-Cost pH Logger.开源设备与参考工业设备之间一致性和相似性的正式评估及其在低成本pH记录仪中的应用
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 12;24(2):490. doi: 10.3390/s24020490.
5
Measurement error of pulse pressure variation.脉压变异测量误差。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Apr;38(2):313-323. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01099-x. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
6
Agreement between pulse oximetry and arterial oxygen saturation measurement in critical care patients during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.脉搏血氧仪与动脉血氧饱和度测量在 COVID-19 重症患者中的一致性:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Aug;37(4):977-984. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00959-2. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
7
Assessing Agreement When Agreement Is Hard to Assess-The Agatston Score for Coronary Calcification.当一致性难以评估时评估一致性——冠状动脉钙化的阿加斯顿评分
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;12(12):2993. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12122993.
8
The Bland-Altman method should not be used when one of the two measurement methods has negligible measurement errors.当两种测量方法中的一种具有可忽略的测量误差时,不应使用 Bland-Altman 方法。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 12;17(12):e0278915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278915. eCollection 2022.
9
Accuracy of an Off-Label Transmitter and Data Manager Paired With an Intermittent Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitor in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.标签外传输器和数据管理器与间歇性扫描连续血糖监测仪在 1 型糖尿病成人中的准确性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 May;18(3):701-708. doi: 10.1177/19322968221133405. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
10
Bioreactance reliably detects preload responsiveness by the end-expiratory occlusion test when averaging and refresh times are shortened.当平均时间和刷新时间缩短时,生物电阻抗通过呼气末阻断试验能够可靠地检测前负荷反应性。
Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Aug 28;11(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00920-7.