Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Apr;98(4):1013-1020. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0806. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
Diarrhea is a leading cause of death among children aged less than five years globally. Most studies of pediatric diarrhea rely on caregiver-reported stool consistency and frequency to define the disease. Research on the validity of caregiver-reported diarrhea is sparse. We collected stool samples from 2,398 children participating in two clinical trials in the Amhara region of Ethiopia. The consistency of each stool sample was graded by the child's caregiver and two trained laboratory technicians according to an illustrated stool consistency scale. We assessed the reliability of graded stool consistency among the technicians, and then compared the caregiver's grade with the technician's grade. We also tested if the illustrated stool consistency scale could improve the validity of caregiver's report. The weighted kappa measuring the agreement between the two laboratory technicians reached 0.90 after 500 stool samples were graded. The sensitivity of caregiver-reported loose or watery stool was 15.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7, 24.2) and the specificity was 98.4% (95% CI 97.1, 99.1). With the illustrated scale, the sensitivity was 68.5% (95% CI: 58.5, 77.1) and the specificity was 86.1% (95% CI: 79.3, 90.9). The results indicate that caregiver-reported stool consistency using the terms "loose or watery" does not accurately describe stool consistency as graded by trained laboratory technicians. Given the predominance of using caregiver-reported stool consistency to define diarrheal disease, the low sensitivity identified in this study suggests that the burden of diarrheal disease may be underestimated and intervention effects could be biased. The illustrated scale is a potential low-lost tool to improve the validity of caregiver-reported stool consistency.
腹泻是全球 5 岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因。大多数儿科腹泻研究依赖于照顾者报告的粪便稠度和频率来定义疾病。关于照顾者报告腹泻的有效性的研究很少。我们从参加埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉地区两项临床试验的 2398 名儿童中收集了粪便样本。根据说明性粪便稠度量表,由儿童的照顾者和两名经过培训的实验室技术人员对每个粪便样本的稠度进行分级。我们评估了技术人员分级粪便稠度的可靠性,然后比较了照顾者的等级与技术人员的等级。我们还测试了说明性粪便稠度量表是否可以提高照顾者报告的有效性。在对 500 个粪便样本进行分级后,衡量两名实验室技术员之间一致性的加权 Kappa 值达到 0.90。照顾者报告的稀便或水样便的敏感性为 15.5%(95%置信区间[CI]:9.7,24.2),特异性为 98.4%(95%CI 97.1,99.1)。使用说明性量表,敏感性为 68.5%(95%CI:58.5,77.1),特异性为 86.1%(95%CI:79.3,90.9)。结果表明,照顾者使用“稀便或水样便”报告粪便稠度并不能准确描述经过训练的实验室技术人员分级的粪便稠度。鉴于使用照顾者报告的粪便稠度来定义腹泻病的主导地位,本研究中发现的低敏感性表明腹泻病的负担可能被低估,干预效果可能存在偏差。说明性量表是一种提高照顾者报告粪便稠度有效性的潜在低损失工具。