Suppr超能文献

体外重建的人类正常、增生和瘢痕疙瘩模型的表征。

Characterization of In Vitro Reconstructed Human Normotrophic, Hypertrophic, and Keloid Scar Models.

机构信息

1 Department of Dermatology, VU Medical Centre (VUMC) , Amsterdam, The Netherlands .

2 Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Ghent , Ghent, Belgium .

出版信息

Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2018 Apr;24(4):242-253. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0464. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

Abstract

To understand scar pathology, develop new drugs, and provide a platform for personalized medicine, physiologically relevant human scar models are required, which are characteristic of different scar pathologies. Hypertrophic scars and keloids are two types of abnormal scar resulting from unknown abnormalities in the wound healing process. While they display different clinical behavior, differentiation between the two can be difficult-which in turn means that it is difficult to develop optimal therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to develop in vitro reconstructed human hypertrophic and keloid scar models and compare these to normotrophic scar and normal skin models to identify distinguishing biomarkers. Keratinocytes and fibroblasts from normal skin and scar types (normotrophic, hypertrophic, keloid) were used to reconstruct skin models. All skin models showed a reconstructed differentiated epidermis on a fibroblast populated collagen-elastin matrix. Both abnormal scar types showed increased contraction, dermal thickness, and myofibroblast staining compared to normal skin and normotrophic scar. Notably, the expression of extracellular matrix associated genes showed distinguishing profiles between all scar types and normal skin (hyaluronan synthase-1, matrix-metalloprotease-3), between keloid and normal skin (collagen type IV), between normal scar and keloid (laminin α1), and between keloid and hypertrophic scar (matrix-metalloprotease-1, integrin α5). Also, inflammatory cytokine and growth factor secretion (CCL5, CXCL1, CXCL8, CCL27, IL-6, HGF) showed differential secretion between scar types. Our results strongly suggest that abnormal scars arise from different pathologies rather than simply being on different ends of the scarring spectrum. Furthermore, such normal skin and scar models together with biomarkers, which distinguish the different scar types, would provide an animal free, physiologically relevant scar diagnostic and drug testing platform for the future.

摘要

为了理解疤痕病理学、开发新药物并为个性化医学提供平台,需要具有不同疤痕病理学特征的生理相关的人类疤痕模型。增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩是两种由于伤口愈合过程中未知异常而导致的异常瘢痕。虽然它们表现出不同的临床行为,但两者之间的区分很困难,这反过来又意味着很难制定最佳的治疗策略。本研究旨在开发体外重建的人类增生性和瘢痕疙瘩瘢痕模型,并将其与正常瘢痕和正常皮肤模型进行比较,以确定区分生物标志物。从正常皮肤和瘢痕类型(正常、增生性、瘢痕疙瘩)中分离出角质形成细胞和成纤维细胞,用于构建皮肤模型。所有皮肤模型均在成纤维细胞填充的胶原-弹性蛋白基质上显示出重建的分化表皮。与正常皮肤和正常瘢痕相比,两种异常瘢痕类型均显示出更高的收缩、真皮厚度和肌成纤维细胞染色。值得注意的是,细胞外基质相关基因的表达在所有瘢痕类型和正常皮肤之间(透明质酸合酶-1、基质金属蛋白酶-3)、瘢痕疙瘩和正常皮肤之间(IV 型胶原)、正常瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩之间(层粘连蛋白α1)以及瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕之间(基质金属蛋白酶-1、整合素α5)表现出不同的特征。此外,炎症细胞因子和生长因子的分泌(CCL5、CXCL1、CXCL8、CCL27、IL-6、HGF)在瘢痕类型之间也表现出不同的分泌。我们的结果强烈表明,异常瘢痕是由不同的病理引起的,而不仅仅是瘢痕谱的不同末端。此外,这样的正常皮肤和瘢痕模型以及区分不同瘢痕类型的生物标志物,将为未来提供一种无动物、生理相关的瘢痕诊断和药物测试平台。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验