Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Malar J. 2018 Mar 1;17(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2247-z.
The Government of Tanzania is the main source of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for its population. Mosquito nets (treated and untreated) are also available in the commercial market. To sustain investments and health gains in the fight against malaria, it is important for the National Malaria Control Programme to monitor LLIN coverage especially in the years between mass distributions and to understand what households do if their free nets are deemed unusable. The aim of this paper was to assess standard LLIN indicators by wealth status in Tanzania in 2013, 2 years after the last mass campaign in 2011, and extend the analysis to untreated nets (UTNs) to investigate how households adapt when nets are not continuously distributed.
Between October-December 2013, a household survey was conducted in 3398 households in eight districts in Tanzania. Using the Roll Back Malaria indicators, the study analysed: (1) household net ownership; (2) access to nets; (3) population net use and (4) net use:access ratio. Outcomes were calculated for LLINs and UTNs. Results were analysed by socio-economic quintiles and by district.
Only three of the eight districts had household LLIN ownership of more than 80%. In 2013, less than a quarter of the households had one LLIN for every two people and only half of the population had access to an LLIN. Only the wealthier quintiles increased their net ownership and access to levels above 80% through the addition of UTNs. Overall net use of the population was low (LLINs: 32.8%; UTNs: 9.5%) and net use:access ratio was below target level (LLINs: 0.66; UTN: 0.50). Both measures varied significantly by district.
Two years after the last mass campaign, the percentage of households or population with access to LLINs was low. These findings indicate the average rate at which households in Tanzania lose their nets is higher than the rate at which they acquire new nets. The wealthiest households topped up their household net ownership with UTNs. Efforts to make LLINs available through commercial markets should be promoted, so those who can afford to buy nets purchase LLINs rather than UTNs. Net use was low around 40% and mostly explained by lack of access to nets. However, the use:access ratio was poor in Mbozi and Kahama districts warranting further investigations to understand other barriers to net use.
坦桑尼亚政府是其民众长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)的主要来源。商业市场也有出售蚊帐(处理过和未处理过的)。为了维持在抗击疟疾方面的投资和健康收益,国家疟疾控制规划必须监测 LLIN 的覆盖情况,尤其是在大规模分发之后的几年,并了解如果免费发放的蚊帐被认为无法使用,家庭会怎么做。本文的目的是评估 2013 年坦桑尼亚按财富状况划分的标准 LLIN 指标,这是在 2011 年最后一次大规模运动之后的两年,同时将分析扩展到未处理的蚊帐(UTNs),以调查当蚊帐不能持续分发时家庭如何适应。
2013 年 10 月至 12 月,在坦桑尼亚的 8 个区的 3398 户家庭中进行了一项家庭调查。使用“击退疟疾”指标,研究分析了:(1)家庭蚊帐拥有情况;(2)获取蚊帐的途径;(3)人口蚊帐使用情况;(4)蚊帐使用/获取比率。结果分别针对 LLIN 和 UTN 进行计算。结果按社会经济五分位数和区进行分析。
只有 8 个区中的 3 个区的家庭 LLIN 拥有率超过 80%。2013 年,不到四分之一的家庭每两个人拥有一床 LLIN,只有一半的人口能获得 LLIN。只有较富裕的五分位数通过增加 UTN,将其蚊帐拥有率和获取率提高到 80%以上。总体而言,人口的蚊帐使用率很低(LLINs:32.8%;UTNs:9.5%),且蚊帐使用/获取比率低于目标水平(LLINs:0.66;UTN:0.50)。这两个指标在区与区之间差异显著。
在最后一次大规模运动之后的两年,能获得 LLIN 的家庭或人口的比例较低。这些发现表明,坦桑尼亚家庭失去蚊帐的平均速度高于获得新蚊帐的速度。最富裕的家庭用 UTN 来补充其家庭蚊帐拥有量。应通过商业市场促进 LLIN 的供应,以便那些有能力购买蚊帐的人购买 LLIN 而不是 UTN。蚊帐使用率约为 40%,主要原因是缺乏蚊帐。然而,在姆博齐和卡哈马区,使用/获取比率较差,需要进一步调查以了解阻碍蚊帐使用的其他因素。