Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101 (internal code 549), 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands.
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Mar 1;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0291-7.
Family carers manage a wide range of responsibilities in the lives and care of patients receiving palliative care. They fulfil multiple roles and perform activities within different settings. This has immediate consequences on family carers' every-day lives. According to literature, family carers in palliative care are both part of the formal and informal care network, but also persons in need of support. This article aims to investigate 1) burdens and rewards associated with family caregiving and 2) what family carers find helpful in their contact with professionals from integrated palliative care initiatives (IPC-i) and other services.
Family carers looking after patients with cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic heart failure were purposefully recruited at 22 IPC-i in Belgium, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom in the course of the project "Patient-centred palliative care pathways in advanced cancer and chronic disease" (InSup-C). Semi-structured interviews (n = 156) and 87 quantitative questionnaires (CRA, POS, CANHELP Lite) were conducted with family carers. Interviews were analysed with transnationally agreed thematic codes (MAXQDA or NVivo). Statistical tests (SPSS) were carried out in accordance with the characteristic value of the items and distributions.
On average, quantitative data showed moderate burden, but the qualitative findings indicated that this burden might be underrated. There is some evidence that IPC-i with well-developed professional care networks and communication systems relieved family carers' burden by direct and indirect interventions; e.g. provision of night shift nurses or psychological support. Needs of family carers were similar in all participating countries. However, in all countries IPC-i mostly offered one-off events for family carers, lacking systematic or institutionalised support structures.
Data suggest that, most IPC-i did not pay enough attention to the needs of most family carers, and did not offer proactive care and access to supportive resources to them (e.g. training, respite care, access to resources). We recommend recognizing family carers as part of the 'unit of care' and partner in caregiving, to improve their knowledge about, and access to, and the support available.
在接受姑息治疗的患者的生活和护理中,家庭护理人员承担着广泛的责任。他们在不同的环境中履行多种角色并开展各种活动。这对家庭护理人员的日常生活产生了直接影响。根据文献,姑息治疗中的家庭护理人员既是正式和非正式护理网络的一部分,也是需要支持的人员。本文旨在调查 1)与家庭护理相关的负担和回报,以及 2)家庭护理人员在与姑息治疗综合倡议(IPC-i)和其他服务的专业人员接触时发现哪些方面有帮助。
在比利时、德国、匈牙利、荷兰和英国的 22 个 IPC-i 中,有目的的招募了照顾患有癌症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病或慢性心力衰竭的患者的家庭护理人员,参与“晚期癌症和慢性病以患者为中心的姑息治疗路径”(InSup-C)项目。对家庭护理人员进行了半结构化访谈(n=156)和 87 份定量问卷(CRA、POS、CANHELP Lite)。使用跨国商定的主题代码(MAXQDA 或 NVivo)对访谈进行了分析。根据项目的特征值和分布情况,进行了统计检验(SPSS)。
平均而言,定量数据显示负担适中,但定性结果表明,这种负担可能被低估了。有一些证据表明,IPC-i 通过直接和间接干预,如提供夜班护士或心理支持,通过发达的专业护理网络和沟通系统缓解了家庭护理人员的负担。所有参与国家的家庭护理人员的需求都相似。然而,在所有国家,IPC-i 主要为家庭护理人员提供一次性活动,缺乏系统或制度化的支持结构。
数据表明,大多数 IPC-i 没有充分关注大多数家庭护理人员的需求,也没有为他们提供主动护理和支持资源(例如培训、暂息护理、资源获取)。我们建议将家庭护理人员视为“护理单元”的一部分,并将其视为护理伙伴,以提高他们对资源的了解、获取和支持。