1 Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
2 Division of Health Research, International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;31(10):946-955. doi: 10.1177/0269216317697898. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
Patients with advanced diseases often experience deficient continuity of care. Although integrated palliative care promotes continuity of care, it is not clear how it can be optimized to improve continuity of care experiences.
To examine how relational, informational and management continuity of care are experienced by patients with advanced diseases and their family caregivers receiving care from several integrated palliative care initiatives in five European countries.
We adopted a longitudinal qualitative study design including two interviews (interval 3 months) with patients and family caregivers focusing on how health care professionals responded to their needs. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis involved a two-step qualitative content approach.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 22 integrated palliative care initiatives (established local palliative care collaborations) were selected in Belgium, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. We recruited 152 patients (63% cancer, 24% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 13% heart failure; life expectancy <1 year; mean age 68 years, 56% female) and 92 family caregivers (mean age 61 years, 66% female).
Trusted relationships with a small number of key health care professionals to receive tailored care and easily access help were essential. Relational continuity was often deficient, especially with general practitioners. Although informational and management continuity was often lacking in care provision, collaborative integrated palliative care initiatives were related to consistent and coherent care.
Patients and family caregivers most likely experience continuity of care by having a small number of trusted health care professionals who are available, provide multidisciplinary care and regularly transfer information to all health care professionals involved. Optimizing continuity of care requires further integration of integrated palliative care initiatives with other health care professionals involved in the patients' care networks.
晚期疾病患者通常会经历护理连续性不足的问题。虽然综合姑息治疗可促进护理连续性,但尚不清楚如何优化它以改善护理连续性体验。
探讨在五个欧洲国家的五个综合姑息治疗计划中接受治疗的晚期疾病患者及其家属照顾者,在体验连续性护理时如何体验关系连续性、信息连续性和管理连续性。
我们采用了纵向定性研究设计,包括对患者和家属照顾者进行两次访谈(间隔 3 个月),重点关注卫生保健专业人员如何回应他们的需求。访谈进行了录音并逐字记录。分析包括两步定性内容方法。
设置/参与者:在比利时、德国、匈牙利、荷兰和英国,总共选择了 22 个综合姑息治疗计划(建立了当地姑息治疗合作)。我们招募了 152 名患者(63%为癌症,24%为慢性阻塞性肺疾病,13%为心力衰竭;预期寿命<1 年;平均年龄为 68 岁,56%为女性)和 92 名家属照顾者(平均年龄为 61 岁,66%为女性)。
与少数值得信赖的卫生保健专业人员建立关系以获得量身定制的护理并轻松获得帮助至关重要。关系连续性通常不足,尤其是与全科医生。尽管信息连续性和管理连续性在护理提供中经常缺乏,但协作式综合姑息治疗计划与一致和连贯的护理有关。
患者和家属照顾者最有可能通过拥有少数值得信赖的卫生保健专业人员来体验护理连续性,这些专业人员随时可用,提供多学科护理,并定期向所有参与护理的卫生保健专业人员传递信息。优化连续性护理需要进一步整合姑息治疗计划与患者护理网络中涉及的其他卫生保健专业人员。