O'Dea Rose E, Noble Daniel W A, Johnson Sheri L, Hesselson Daniel, Nakagawa Shinichi
Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Environ Epigenet. 2016 Feb 15;2(1):dvv014. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvv014. eCollection 2016 Jan.
Rapid environmental change is predicted to compromise population survival, and the resulting strong selective pressure can erode genetic variation, making evolutionary rescue unlikely. Non-genetic inheritance may provide a solution to this problem and help explain the current lack of fit between purely genetic evolutionary models and empirical data. We hypothesize that epigenetic modifications can facilitate evolutionary rescue through 'epigenetic buffering'. By facilitating the inheritance of novel phenotypic variants that are generated by environmental change-a strategy we call 'heritable bet hedging'-epigenetic modifications could maintain and increase the evolutionary potential of a population. This process may facilitate genetic adaptation by preserving existing genetic variation, releasing cryptic genetic variation and/or facilitating mutations in functional loci. Although we show that examples of non-genetic inheritance are often maladaptive in the short term, accounting for phenotypic variance and non-adaptive plasticity may reveal important evolutionary implications over longer time scales. We also discuss the possibility that maladaptive epigenetic responses may be due to 'epigenetic traps', whereby evolutionarily novel factors (e.g. endocrine disruptors) hack into the existing epigenetic machinery. We stress that more ecologically relevant work on transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is required. Researchers conducting studies on transgenerational environmental effects should report measures of phenotypic variance, so that the possibility of both bet hedging and heritable bet hedging can be assessed. Future empirical and theoretical work is required to assess the relative importance of genetic and epigenetic variation, and their interaction, for evolutionary rescue.
预计快速的环境变化会危及种群生存,由此产生的强大选择压力会侵蚀遗传变异,使进化拯救变得不太可能。非遗传继承可能为这一问题提供解决方案,并有助于解释当前纯粹的遗传进化模型与实证数据之间缺乏契合度的现象。我们假设表观遗传修饰可以通过“表观遗传缓冲”促进进化拯救。通过促进由环境变化产生的新表型变异的继承——我们将这一策略称为“可遗传的风险对冲”——表观遗传修饰可以维持并增加种群的进化潜力。这一过程可能通过保留现有遗传变异、释放隐藏的遗传变异和/或促进功能基因座中的突变来促进遗传适应。虽然我们表明非遗传继承的例子在短期内往往是适应不良的,但考虑表型方差和非适应性可塑性可能会揭示更长时间尺度上重要的进化意义。我们还讨论了适应不良的表观遗传反应可能是由于“表观遗传陷阱”导致的可能性,即进化上新出现的因素(如内分泌干扰物)侵入现有的表观遗传机制。我们强调需要开展更多与生态相关的跨代表观遗传继承研究。对跨代环境影响进行研究的人员应报告表型方差的测量结果,以便能够评估风险对冲和可遗传的风险对冲的可能性。未来需要开展实证和理论工作,以评估遗传和表观遗传变异及其相互作用对进化拯救的相对重要性。