Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.
Anim Cogn. 2024 Nov 2;27(1):74. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01912-3.
A well replicated result in humans is that performance, whether good or bad, is consistent across a wide variety of cognitive tasks. Factor analysis extracts one factor that can account for approximately half of the variance in performance. This factor is termed g and almost all cognitive tasks positively load onto this factor. While some neurobiological correlates of g have been identified in humans, causal experiments are only feasible in animals. When mice and some avian species are assessed with cognitive test batteries, performance positively correlates, and the first component extracted has similar properties to g. There are some limitations to the species tested thus far, including comparability in the cognitive domains assessed. The pigeon is an ideal subject to overcome these issues since pigeons, humans, and other primates are frequently given similar tasks and many neural correlates of performance have been identified in the pigeon. We created a test battery that assessed different domains, including associative learning, memory, cognitive flexibility, and reaction time. When all tasks were included, there was evidence for a two-component structure that was influenced by subjects' age. When the reaction time task was excluded, there was a g-like component. The implications for these results when constructing future test batteries and comparing across species are discussed.
人类中一个经过良好复制的结果是,表现(无论好坏)在各种认知任务中都是一致的。因素分析提取出一个可以解释大约一半表现差异的因素。这个因素被称为 g,几乎所有的认知任务都积极地加载在这个因素上。虽然已经在人类中确定了 g 的一些神经生物学相关性,但因果实验仅在动物中可行。当老鼠和一些鸟类物种用认知测试组合进行评估时,表现呈正相关,提取的第一个成分具有与 g 相似的性质。到目前为止,测试的物种存在一些局限性,包括评估的认知领域的可比性。鸽子是克服这些问题的理想对象,因为鸽子、人类和其他灵长类动物经常被给予类似的任务,并且在鸽子中已经确定了许多与表现相关的神经相关性。我们创建了一个测试组合,评估了不同的领域,包括联想学习、记忆、认知灵活性和反应时间。当包含所有任务时,有证据表明存在一个由被试年龄影响的双成分结构。当排除反应时间任务时,存在一个类似 g 的成分。当构建未来的测试组合并在物种间进行比较时,这些结果的意义将被讨论。