• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

猴子记忆:相同/不同概念学习、序列探测习得及探测延迟效应

Monkey memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe acquisition, and probe delay effects.

作者信息

Wright A A, Santiago H C, Sands S F

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Oct;10(4):513-29.

PMID:6491610
Abstract

Three rhesus monkeys were trained and tested in a same/different task with six successive sets of 70 item pairs to an 88% accuracy on each set. Their poor initial transfer performance (55% correct) with novel stimuli improved dramatically to 85% correct following daily item changes in the training stimuli. They acquired a serial-probe-recognition (SPR) task with variable (1-6) item list lengths. This SPR acquisition, although gradual, was more rapid for the monkeys than for pigeons similarly trained. Testing with a fixed list length of four items at different delays between the last list item and the probe test item revealed changes in the serial-position function: a recency effect (last items remembered well) for 0-s delay, recency and primacy effects (first and last list items remembered well) for 1-, 2-, and 10-s delays, and only a primacy effect for the longest 30-s delay. These results are compared with similar ones from pigeons and are discussed in relation to theories of memory processing.

摘要

三只恒河猴接受了相同/不同任务的训练和测试,该任务有六组连续的70个项目对,每组的准确率达到88%。它们最初对新刺激的转移表现较差(正确率为55%),但在训练刺激中每天更换项目后,正确率大幅提高到85%。它们学会了具有可变(1 - 6)项目列表长度的序列探测识别(SPR)任务。这种SPR任务的习得虽然是渐进的,但猴子比接受类似训练的鸽子学得更快。在最后一个列表项目和探测测试项目之间的不同延迟下,用固定的四个项目列表长度进行测试,揭示了序列位置函数的变化:0秒延迟时有近因效应(最后几个项目记忆良好),1秒、2秒和10秒延迟时有近因和首因效应(列表的第一个和最后一个项目记忆良好),而在最长的30秒延迟时只有首因效应。这些结果与鸽子的类似结果进行了比较,并结合记忆处理理论进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Monkey memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe acquisition, and probe delay effects.猴子记忆:相同/不同概念学习、序列探测习得及探测延迟效应
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Oct;10(4):513-29.
2
Pigeon memory: same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function.鸽子记忆:相同/不同概念学习、序列探测识别习得以及探测延迟对序列位置函数的影响。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1984 Oct;10(4):498-512.
3
Auditory list memory and interference processes in monkeys.猴子的听觉列表记忆与干扰过程
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1999 Jul;25(3):284-96.
4
Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.灵长类动物和鸟类中相同/不同概念学习的机制。
Behav Processes. 2006 Jun 1;72(3):234-54. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.03.009. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
5
Serial probe recognition performance by a rhesus monkey and a human with 10- and 20-item lists.恒河猴和人类在面对10项及20项列表时的连续探针识别表现。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1980 Oct;6(4):386-96.
6
Long-term proactive interference and novelty enhancement effect in monkey list memory.猴子列表记忆中的长期主动干扰和新奇增强效应。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1988 Apr;14(2):146-54.
7
Functional relationships for determining similarities and differences in comparative cognition.用于确定比较认知中异同的功能关系。
Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(3):246-51. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
8
Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).恒河猴(猕猴)对相同/不同抽象概念的学习机制
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2002 Oct;28(4):358-68.
9
Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons.鸽子对相同/不同抽象概念的学习。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Jan;32(1):80-6. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.80.
10
Serial list linking by macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta): list property limitations.猕猴(恒河猴)的序列列表链接:列表属性限制
J Comp Psychol. 2007 Aug;121(3):250-9. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.3.250.

引用本文的文献

1
Breaking the perceptual-conceptual barrier: Relational matching and working memory.打破感知-概念障碍:关系匹配与工作记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):544-560. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0890-9.
2
High-Speed Videography Reveals How Honeybees Can Turn a Spatial Concept Learning Task Into a Simple Discrimination Task by Stereotyped Flight Movements and Sequential Inspection of Pattern Elements.高速摄像揭示了蜜蜂如何通过刻板的飞行运动和对图案元素的顺序检查,将空间概念学习任务转化为简单的辨别任务。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 3;9:1347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01347. eCollection 2018.
3
Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.
通过整合概念学习、前摄干扰和列表记忆来比较认知。
Learn Behav. 2018 Jun;46(2):107-123. doi: 10.3758/s13420-018-0316-3.
4
Transfer of the nonmatch-to-goal rule in monkeys across cognitive domains.猴子跨认知领域的非匹配目标规则转移。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e84100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084100. eCollection 2013.
5
Biases in preferences for sequences of outcomes in monkeys.猴子对结果序列的偏好偏差。
Cognition. 2014 Mar;130(3):289-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
6
Fading perceptual resemblance: a path for rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) to conceptual matching?渐逝知觉相似性:恒河猴(Macaca mulatta)进行概念匹配的途径?
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):598-614. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
7
Functional relationships for investigating cognitive processes.用于研究认知过程的功能关系。
Behav Processes. 2013 Feb;93:4-24. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
8
The representative animal.代表性动物。
Behav Anal. 1994 Fall;17(2):207-19. doi: 10.1007/BF03392669.
9
Rhesus monkeys lack a consistent peak-end effect.恒河猴缺乏一致的峰终效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Dec;64(12):2301-15. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.591936. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
10
Individual differences: either relational learning or item-specific learning in a same/different task.个体差异:在相同/不同任务中,要么是关系学习,要么是特定项目学习。
Learn Behav. 2009 May;37(2):204-13. doi: 10.3758/LB.37.2.204.