• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的预后分级和分期组在保守治疗前列腺癌中的表现。

The performance of the new prognostic grade and stage groups in conservatively treated prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213003, China.

Department of Urology, Nanyang Second General Hospital, Nanyang 473012, China.

出版信息

Asian J Androl. 2018 Jul-Aug;20(4):366-371. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_5_18.

DOI:10.4103/aja.aja_5_18
PMID:29493549
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6038159/
Abstract

We evaluated the prognosis of the new grade groups and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage groups in men with prostate cancer (PCa) who were treated conservatively. A total of 13 798 eligible men were chosen from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. The new grade and AJCC stage groups were investigated on prostate biopsy specimens. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable hazards models were applied to estimate the association of new grade and stage groups with overall survival (OS) and PCa-specific survival (CSS). Mean follow-up was 42.65 months (95% confidence interval: 42.47-42.84) in the entire cohort. The 3-year OS and CSS rates stepped down for grade groups 1-5 and AJCC stage groups I-IVB, respectively. After adjusting for clinical and pathological characteristics, all grade groups and AJCC stage groups were associated with higher all-cause and PCa-specific mortality compared to the reference group (all P ≤ 0.003). In conclusion, we evaluated the oncological outcome of the new grade and AJCC stage groups on biopsy specimens of conservatively treated PCa. These two novel clinically relevant classifications can assist physicians to determine different therapeutic strategies for PCa patients.

摘要

我们评估了新分级组和美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期组在接受保守治疗的前列腺癌(PCa)男性患者中的预后。从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中选择了总共 13798 名符合条件的男性。新的分级和 AJCC 分期组在前列腺活检标本上进行了研究。Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和多变量风险模型用于估计新分级和分期组与总生存(OS)和 PCa 特异性生存(CSS)的相关性。整个队列的平均随访时间为 42.65 个月(95%置信区间:42.47-42.84)。3 年 OS 和 CSS 率分别逐降为分级组 1-5 和 AJCC 分期组 I-IVB。在校正了临床和病理特征后,与参考组相比,所有分级组和 AJCC 分期组与全因和 PCa 特异性死亡率升高相关(均 P≤0.003)。总之,我们评估了新分级和 AJCC 分期组在保守治疗的 PCa 活检标本上的肿瘤学结果。这两种新的具有临床相关性的分类方法可以帮助医生为 PCa 患者确定不同的治疗策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074c/6038159/cef8dd663544/AJA-20-366-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074c/6038159/77eb4992889b/AJA-20-366-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074c/6038159/cef8dd663544/AJA-20-366-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074c/6038159/77eb4992889b/AJA-20-366-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/074c/6038159/cef8dd663544/AJA-20-366-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The performance of the new prognostic grade and stage groups in conservatively treated prostate cancer.新的预后分级和分期组在保守治疗前列腺癌中的表现。
Asian J Androl. 2018 Jul-Aug;20(4):366-371. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_5_18.
2
Evaluation of clinical staging of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (eighth edition) for prostate cancer.评估美国癌症联合委员会(第八版)的前列腺癌临床分期。
World J Urol. 2018 May;36(5):769-774. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2183-0. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
3
Might men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer benefit from definitive treatment of the primary tumor? A SEER-based study.被诊断患有转移性前列腺癌的男性是否会从原发性肿瘤的确定性治疗中获益?一项基于 SEER 的研究。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1058-66. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
4
Outcome evaluation of the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for prostate carcinoma treated by radiation therapy.1997年美国癌症联合委员会前列腺癌放射治疗分期系统的疗效评估。
Cancer. 1999 Apr 15;85(8):1816-21. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990415)85:8<1816::aid-cncr23>3.0.co;2-u.
5
Prognostic values of clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in prostate infiltrating ductal carcinoma: a population-based study.前列腺浸润性导管癌临床病理特征及生存结局的预后价值:一项基于人群的研究。
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 25;8(17):29048-29055. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16070.
6
Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study.前列腺癌新分级组的预后价值:一项多机构欧洲验证研究
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Jun;20(2):197-202. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.66. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
Long-term Results of Active Surveillance in the Göteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.哥德堡随机、基于人群的前列腺癌筛查试验中主动监测的长期结果。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):760-766. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.048. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
8
Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Stage Groups Updated in the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging Manual.第八版美国癌症联合委员会肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期手册中更新的前列腺癌分期组的评估。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e221-e226. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.10.015. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
9
Early prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction on the basis of preoperative and postoperative tumor characteristics.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后早期前列腺特异性抗原复发:基于术前和术后肿瘤特征的预测
Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):21-30. doi: 10.1159/000019922.
10
Evaluation of the 8th AJCC staging system for pathologically versus clinically staged pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A time to revisit a dogma?评估第 8 版 AJCC 病理分期与临床分期系统在胰腺腺癌中的应用:是否需要重新审视这一传统观点?
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018 Feb;17(1):64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade.Gleason分级系统修订版及Gleason分级以外的组织病理学因素的预后效用
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 18;14:59-70. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S339140. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Contemporary grading of prostate cancer: 2017 update for pathologists and clinicians.前列腺癌的当代分级:2017年病理学家和临床医生更新版
Asian J Androl. 2017 Aug 4;21(1):19-23. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_24_17.
2
Prostate cancer - major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.前列腺癌——美国癌症联合委员会第八版癌症分期手册中的重大变化。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 May 6;67(3):245-253. doi: 10.3322/caac.21391. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
3
Oncological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on New Gleason Grouping System: A Validation Study From University of Southern California With 3,755 Cases.
基于新 Gleason 分组系统的高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的肿瘤学结局:来自南加州大学的 3755 例病例验证研究
Prostate. 2017 May;77(7):743-748. doi: 10.1002/pros.23306. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
4
Prognostic value of the new Grade Groups in Prostate Cancer: a multi-institutional European validation study.前列腺癌新分级组的预后价值:一项多机构欧洲验证研究
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Jun;20(2):197-202. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.66. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
6
Application of a Prognostic Gleason Grade Grouping System to Assess Distant Prostate Cancer Outcomes.应用预后格里森分组系统评估远处前列腺癌结局。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):750-759. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.032. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
7
Predictive efficacy of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system in initially diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.2014 年国际泌尿病理学会格里森分级系统在初诊转移性前列腺癌中的预测疗效。
Asian J Androl. 2017 Sep-Oct;19(5):573-578. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.186184.
8
Extreme Gleason Upgrading From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: A Population-based Analysis.从活检到根治性前列腺切除术的Gleason分级极端升级:一项基于人群的分析。
Urology. 2016 Oct;96:148-155. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.058. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
9
Independent validation of the prognostic capacity of the ISUP prostate cancer grade grouping system for radiation treated patients with long-term follow-up.对接受放疗且长期随访的患者,ISUP前列腺癌分级分组系统预后能力的独立验证。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Sep;19(3):292-7. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.18. Epub 2016 May 24.
10
Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome.以前列腺癌死亡为结局对当代前列腺癌分级系统进行验证。
Br J Cancer. 2016 May 10;114(10):1078-83. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.86. Epub 2016 Apr 21.