Suppr超能文献

固相萃取作为水样的样品制备方法,用于基于细胞的和其他体外生物测定。

Solid-phase extraction as sample preparation of water samples for cell-based and other in vitro bioassays.

机构信息

Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia.

UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018 Mar 1;20(3):493-504. doi: 10.1039/c7em00555e.

Abstract

In vitro bioassays are increasingly used for water quality monitoring. Surface water samples often need to be enriched to observe an effect and solid-phase extraction (SPE) is commonly applied for this purpose. The applied methods are typically optimised for the recovery of target chemicals and not for effect recovery for bioassays. A review of the few studies that have evaluated SPE recovery for bioassays showed a lack of experimentally determined recoveries. Therefore, we systematically measured effect recovery of a mixture of 579 organic chemicals covering a wide range of physicochemical properties that were spiked into a pristine water sample and extracted using large volume solid-phase extraction (LVSPE). Assays indicative of activation of xenobiotic metabolism, hormone receptor-mediated effects and adaptive stress responses were applied, with non-specific effects determined through cytotoxicity measurements. Overall, effect recovery was found to be similar to chemical recovery for the majority of bioassays and LVSPE blanks had no effect. Multi-layer SPE exhibited greater recovery of spiked chemicals compared to LVSPE, but the blanks triggered cytotoxicity at high enrichment. Chemical recovery data together with single chemical effect data were used to retrospectively estimate with reverse recovery modelling that there was typically less than 30% effect loss expected due to reduced SPE recovery in published surface water monitoring studies. The combination of targeted experiments and mixture modelling clearly shows the utility of SPE as a sample preparation method for surface water samples, but also emphasizes the need for adequate controls when extraction methods are adapted from chemical analysis workflows.

摘要

体外生物测定法越来越多地用于水质监测。为了观察效果,通常需要对地表水样本进行富集,而固相萃取(SPE)常用于此目的。所应用的方法通常针对目标化学物质的回收进行优化,而不是针对生物测定法的效果回收进行优化。对少数评估 SPE 对生物测定法的效果回收的研究进行综述后发现,缺乏经过实验确定的回收率。因此,我们系统地测量了 579 种有机化学品混合物的效应回收率,这些化学品涵盖了广泛的物理化学性质,它们被添加到原始水样中,并使用大体积固相萃取(LVSPE)进行提取。应用了指示外源性代谢物激活、激素受体介导的效应和适应性应激反应的生物测定法,并通过细胞毒性测量确定非特异性效应。总体而言,对于大多数生物测定法,效应回收率与化学回收率相似,并且 LVSPE 空白没有影响。与 LVSPE 相比,多层 SPE 对添加化学品的回收更高,但空白在高浓度时会引发细胞毒性。将化学回收数据与单一化学效应数据结合使用,通过反向回收建模进行回顾性估计表明,在已发表的地表水监测研究中,由于 SPE 回收率降低,通常预计会有不到 30%的效应损失。靶向实验和混合物建模的结合清楚地表明,SPE 作为地表水样本的样品制备方法具有实用性,但也强调了在从化学分析工作流程改编提取方法时,需要适当的对照。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验