Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith School of Environment, Griffith University, Nathan, Qld Australia.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):e0193369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193369. eCollection 2018.
Clearing of dry forests globally creates edges between remnant forest and open anthropogenic habitats. We used flight intercept traps to evaluate how forest beetle communities are influenced by distance from such edges, together with vertical height, spatial location, and local vegetation structure, in an urbanising region (Brisbane, Australia). Species composition (but not total abundance or richness) differed greatly between ground and canopy. Species composition also varied strongly among sites at both ground and canopy levels, but almost all other significant effects occurred only at ground level, where: species richness declined from edge to interior; composition differed between positions near edges (<10 m) and interiors (> 50 m); high local canopy cover was associated with greater total abundance and richness and differing composition; and greater distances to the city centre were associated with increased total abundances and altered composition. Analyses of individual indicator species associated with this variation enabled further biological interpretations. A global literature synthesis showed that most spatially well-replicated studies of edge effects on ground-level beetles within forest fragments have likewise found that positions within tens of metres from edges with open anthropogenic habitats had increased species richness and different compositions from forest interior sites, with fewer effects on abundance. Accordingly, negative edge effects will not prevent relatively small compact fragments (if >10-20 ha) from supporting forest-like beetle communities, although indirect consequences of habitat degradation remain a threat. Retention of multiple spatially scattered forest areas will also be important in conserving forest-dependent beetles, given high levels of between-site diversity.
全球干旱森林的清理在残余森林和开放的人为栖息地之间形成了边缘。我们使用飞行截获陷阱来评估森林甲虫群落如何受到距离这些边缘的影响,以及垂直高度、空间位置和当地植被结构的影响,在一个城市化地区(澳大利亚布里斯班)。物种组成(但不是总丰度或丰富度)在地面和冠层之间有很大的差异。物种组成在地面和冠层水平的各个地点之间也有很大的差异,但几乎所有其他显著的影响都只发生在地面水平,其中:物种丰富度从边缘到内部减少;边缘附近(<10 米)和内部(>50 米)位置的组成不同;高局部树冠覆盖与更高的总丰度和丰富度以及不同的组成有关;与市中心的距离越大,总丰度越高,组成也发生了变化。对与这种变化相关的个别指示物种的分析使进一步的生物学解释成为可能。一项对森林片段中地面甲虫边缘效应的空间复制研究的全球文献综述表明,同样发现与开放的人为栖息地的边缘距离几十米以内的位置具有更高的物种丰富度和与森林内部位置不同的组成,对丰度的影响较小。因此,负面的边缘效应不会阻止相对较小的紧凑片段(如果>10-20 公顷)支持类似森林的甲虫群落,尽管栖息地退化的间接后果仍然是一个威胁。鉴于各地点之间的多样性水平很高,保留多个空间分散的森林区域对于保护依赖森林的甲虫也很重要。