Onarheim Kristine Husøy, Sisay Mitike Molla, Gizaw Muluken, Moland Karen Marie, Norheim Ole Frithof, Miljeteig Ingrid
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, P.O. Box 7804, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 2;18(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2943-y.
The first month of life is the period with the highest risk of dying. Despite knowledge of effective interventions, newborn mortality is high and utilization of health care services remains low in Ethiopia. In settings without universal health coverage, the economy of a household is vulnerable to illness, and out-of-pocket payments may limit families' opportunities to seek health care for newborns. In this paper we explore intra-household resource allocation, focusing on how families prioritize newborn health versus other household needs and their coping strategies for managing these priorities.
A qualitative study was conducted in 2015 in Butajira, Ethiopia, comprising observation, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions with household members, health workers, and community members. Household members with hospitalized newborns or who had experienced neonatal death were primary informants.
In this predominantly rural and poor district, households struggled to pay out-of-pocket for services such as admission, diagnostics, drugs, and transportation. When newborns fell ill, families made hard choices balancing concerns for newborn health and other household needs. The ability to seek care, obtain services, and follow medical advice depended on the social and economic assets of the household. It was common to borrow money from friends and family, or even to sell a sheep or the harvest, if necessary. In managing household priorities and high costs, families waited before seeking health care, or used cheaper traditional medicines. For poor families with no money or opportunity to borrow, it became impossible to follow medical advice or even seek care in the first place. This had fatal health consequences for the sick newborns.
While improving neonatal health is prioritized at policy level in Ethiopia, poor households with sick neonates may prioritize differently. With limited money at hand and high direct health care costs, families balanced conflicting concerns to newborn health and family welfare. We argue that families should not be left in situations where they have to choose between survival of the newborn and economic ruin. Protection against out-of-pocket spending is key as Ethiopia moves towards universal health coverage. A necessary step is to provide prioritized newborn health care services free of charge.
出生后的第一个月是死亡风险最高的时期。尽管了解有效的干预措施,但埃塞俄比亚的新生儿死亡率仍然很高,医疗保健服务的利用率也很低。在没有全民医保的情况下,家庭经济容易受到疾病影响,自付费用可能会限制家庭为新生儿寻求医疗保健的机会。在本文中,我们探讨家庭内部的资源分配,重点关注家庭如何在新生儿健康与其他家庭需求之间进行优先排序,以及他们管理这些优先事项的应对策略。
2015年在埃塞俄比亚的布塔吉拉进行了一项定性研究,包括观察、半结构化访谈以及与家庭成员、医护人员和社区成员的焦点小组讨论。有住院新生儿或经历过新生儿死亡的家庭成员是主要信息提供者。
在这个主要为农村且贫困的地区,家庭难以自掏腰包支付诸如住院、诊断、药品和交通等服务费用。当新生儿生病时,家庭会在关注新生儿健康和其他家庭需求之间艰难抉择。寻求医疗、获得服务以及遵循医疗建议的能力取决于家庭的社会和经济资产。向朋友和家人借钱很常见,如有必要甚至会卖掉一只羊或收成。在管理家庭优先事项和高额费用时,家庭会在寻求医疗保健之前等待,或者使用更便宜的传统药物。对于没有钱或没有借贷机会的贫困家庭来说,一开始就无法遵循医疗建议甚至寻求医疗保健。这对患病的新生儿造成了致命的健康后果。
虽然在埃塞俄比亚的政策层面上,改善新生儿健康被列为优先事项,但有患病新生儿的贫困家庭可能会有不同的优先排序。由于手头资金有限且直接医疗保健成本高昂,家庭在新生儿健康和家庭福利这两个相互冲突的问题之间进行权衡。我们认为,不应让家庭处于必须在新生儿生存和经济破产之间做出选择的境地。随着埃塞俄比亚朝着全民医保迈进,防止自付费用是关键。必要的一步是免费提供优先的新生儿医疗保健服务。