Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助膀胱切除术中的机器人缝合回肠-回肠吻合术。

Robot-sewn ileoileal anastomosis during robot-assisted cystectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Saarland University, Kirrbergerstr, 66421 Homburg, Germany.

Department of Urology, Malteser Krankenhaus Bonn/Rhein-Sieg, Von-Hompesch-Str. 1, 53123, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2018 Jul;36(7):1079-1084. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2237-3. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the feasibility and perioperative results of patients undergoing robot-assisted cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion and robot-sewn ileoileal anastomosis.

METHODS

This is a mono-centric analysis of perioperative data from 48 consecutive patients undergoing robot-assisted cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion and robot-sewn ileoileal anastomosis. Data include the preoperative variables, operative and postoperative course and complication rates related to bowel anastomosis. End points were time spent for anastomosis and intra- and postoperative complication rates.

RESULTS

Median operating time was 23.0 (13-60) min for the ileoileal anastomosis. Median overall operating time was 295 (200-780) min, with a median of 282 (200-418) min and 414.0 (225-780) min for the ileum conduit (N = 35) and ileal neobladder (N = 13). Two patients developed paralytic ileus; in another patient acute peritonitis occurred, but was caused by urinary leakage and therefore unrelated to the bowel anastomosis. No anastomotic leakage was noticed. Costs for the robot-sewn anastomosis was 8€ compared to 1250€ for a stapled anastomosis which was performed in previous cases. Limitations are the non-comparative nature of the analysis and the limited number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-sewn ileoileal anastomosis is feasible with low complication rates. Compared to the stapled anastomosis, a robot-sewn ileoileal anastomosis may serve as an alternative and cost-saving approach.

摘要

目的

分析机器人辅助膀胱切除术行腔内尿路分流和机器人吻合回肠-回肠吻合术的可行性和围手术期结果。

方法

这是一项单中心分析,纳入了 48 例行机器人辅助膀胱切除术行腔内尿路分流和机器人吻合回肠-回肠吻合术的连续患者的围手术期数据。数据包括术前变量、手术和术后过程以及与肠吻合相关的并发症发生率。终点是吻合时间和围手术期并发症发生率。

结果

回肠-回肠吻合术的中位手术时间为 23.0(13-60)分钟。总的中位手术时间为 295(200-780)分钟,其中 35 例患者的回肠导管(N=35)和 13 例患者的回肠新膀胱(N=13)的中位手术时间分别为 282(200-418)分钟和 414.0(225-780)分钟。2 例患者发生麻痹性肠梗阻,另 1 例患者发生急性腹膜炎,但这是由尿漏引起的,与肠吻合无关。未发现吻合口漏。与之前行吻合的吻合器吻合相比,机器人吻合的吻合费用为 8 欧元。本研究的局限性在于分析的非比较性质和患者数量有限。

结论

机器人吻合回肠-回肠吻合术具有较低的并发症发生率,是可行的。与吻合器吻合相比,机器人吻合可能是一种替代方法,并且可以节省成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验