Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术联合体内尿路分流术后输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄的评估:来自一家大型三级转诊中心的结果。

Evaluation of Ureteroenteric Anastomotic Strictures after the Introduction of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Results from a Large Tertiary Referral Center.

机构信息

Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein/Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

Department of Statistics, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein/Utrecht, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):1119-1125. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001518. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Benign ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures following radical cystectomy are a critical complication The incidence is highly dependent on study design, surgical technique and surgeon experience. We studied the incidence of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after open vs robot-assisted radical cystectomy with an intracorporeal urinary diversion, and determined the influence of the introduction of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in our clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, single center, cohort study was performed between January 2012 and December 2017 in all patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine which patient or disease-specific factors were associated with development of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures.

RESULTS

Of 279 patients, 192 (69%) underwent open radical cystectomy and 87 (31%) underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. In total, 47/279 patients (17%) developed ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after a median of 3.0 months (95% CI 2.4-3.7). The difference in incidence of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures was statistically significant between open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy (13% vs 25%, p <0.001). On multivariate analysis, only surgical technique (open vs robot-assisted radical cystectomy) was independently associated with development of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures (p=0.004). There was a peak incidence of ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures after robot-assisted radical cystectomy of 47% during the first year after introduction of the robot-assisted procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Introducing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion can result in an initial peak incidence of strictures, highlighting the importance of surgeon experience and the presence of a learning curve. Nonetheless, after experience has been gained, our results show that patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion are still more likely to develop ureteroenteric anastomotic strictures compared to those undergoing open radical cystectomy.

摘要

目的

根治性膀胱切除术后良性输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄是一种严重的并发症。其发生率高度取决于研究设计、手术技术和外科医生经验。我们研究了开放性与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(采用腔内尿路分流术)后输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄的发生率,并确定了机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术在我们科室应用的影响。

材料和方法

这是一项 2012 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月在所有接受根治性膀胱切除术的患者中进行的回顾性、单中心队列研究。进行多变量分析以确定哪些患者或疾病特异性因素与输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄的发展有关。

结果

在 279 例患者中,192 例(69%)接受了开放性根治性膀胱切除术,87 例(31%)接受了机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(采用腔内尿路分流术)。在 279 例患者中,共有 47 例(17%)在中位时间 3.0 个月(95%CI 2.4-3.7)后发生输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄。开放性和机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄发生率差异有统计学意义(13%比 25%,p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,只有手术技术(开放性与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术)与输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄的发展独立相关(p=0.004)。在机器人辅助手术引入后的第一年,机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄的发生率出现高峰,为 47%。

结论

采用腔内尿路分流术的机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术可导致初始吻合口狭窄发生率较高,这突出了外科医生经验和学习曲线的重要性。尽管如此,在获得经验后,我们的结果表明,与开放性根治性膀胱切除术相比,接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(采用腔内尿路分流术)的患者发生输尿管-肠吻合口狭窄的可能性仍然更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验