• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The perspectives of structurally vulnerable people who use drugs on volunteer stipends and work experiences provided through a drug user organization: Opportunities and limitations.结构性弱势群体(吸毒者)对通过吸毒者组织提供的志愿者津贴和工作经验的看法:机会与限制。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 May;55:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
2
Exploring the Public Health Impacts of Private Security Guards on People Who Use Drugs: a Qualitative Study.探索私人保安对吸毒者的公共卫生影响:一项定性研究。
J Urban Health. 2015 Dec;92(6):1117-30. doi: 10.1007/s11524-015-9992-x.
3
"We're giving you something so we get something in return": Perspectives on research participation and compensation among people living with HIV who use drugs.“我们给你一些东西,所以我们也能得到一些回报”:对吸毒的艾滋病毒感染者参与研究及补偿的看法。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Jan;39:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
4
Qualitative exploration of the impact of employment and volunteering upon the health and wellbeing of African refugees settled in regional Australia: a refugee perspective.定性研究澳大利亚地区非洲难民就业和志愿服务对其健康和福利的影响:难民视角。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;19(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6328-2.
5
Housing in crisis: A qualitative study of the socio-legal contexts of residential evictions in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside.住房危机:对温哥华唐人街住宅驱逐现象的社会法律背景的定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Sep;71:169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.12.012. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
6
Activism and scientific research: 20 years of community action by the Vancouver area network of drug users.行动主义与科学研究:温哥华地区毒友网络 20 年的社区行动
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 May 22;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0158-1.
7
"It's Like A Partnership": Exploring the Primary Care Experiences and Patient-Defined Goals of People Who Use Drugs.“就像合作伙伴关系”:探索吸毒者的初级保健体验和患者定义的目标。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Jul;39(9):1681-1689. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08743-5. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
8
"We don't got that kind of time, man. We're trying to get high!": Exploring potential use of drug checking technologies among structurally vulnerable people who use drugs.“我们没时间了,伙计。我们想嗨起来!”:探索药物检测技术在结构脆弱的吸毒者中的潜在用途。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Sep;71:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Jul 20.
9
Advancing patient-centered care for structurally vulnerable drug-using populations: a qualitative study of the perspectives of people who use drugs regarding the potential integration of harm reduction interventions into hospitals.推进以患者为中心的针对结构上易受伤害的吸毒人群的护理:一项关于吸毒者对将减少伤害干预措施纳入医院的可能性的观点的定性研究。
Addiction. 2016 Apr;111(4):685-94. doi: 10.1111/add.13214. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
10
Transitions in income generation among marginalized people who use drugs: A qualitative study on recycling and vulnerability to violence.边缘化吸毒人群的收入来源转变:关于回收利用和易受暴力侵害性的定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping experiences of workplace stigma and discrimination within the lived-living experience of illicit drug use and bloodborne virus peer workforce: a scoping review.在非法药物使用和血源性病毒同伴工作队伍的生活经历中映射工作场所的耻辱感和歧视经历:一项范围审查。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jul 25;22(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01282-0.
2
Exploring drug consumption rooms as 'inclusion health interventions': policy implications for Europe.将吸毒室作为“包容性健康干预措施”进行探索:对欧洲的政策影响
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Dec 4;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01099-3.
3
Women who use drugs: engagement in practices of harm reduction care.吸毒妇女:参与减少伤害护理的实践。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Apr 13;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00775-0.
4
The "goldfish bowl": a qualitative study of the effects of heightened surveillance on people who use drugs in a rural and coastal Canadian setting.“金鱼缸”效应:在加拿大农村和沿海地区,对受高度监管的吸毒者进行定性研究的效果。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Dec 7;19(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00725-2.
5
Core competencies of peer workers who use pulse oximeters to supplement their overdose response in British Columbia.不列颠哥伦比亚省使用脉搏血氧仪辅助过量反应的同伴工作者的核心能力。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 2;17(9):e0273744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273744. eCollection 2022.
6
"COVID just kind of opened a can of whoop-ass": The rapid growth of safer supply prescribing during the pandemic documented through an environmental scan of addiction and harm reduction services in Canada."COVID 简直是打开了潘多拉魔盒":通过对加拿大成瘾和减少伤害服务的环境扫描,记录了大流行期间更安全供应处方的快速增长。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Aug;106:103742. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103742. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
7
Impact of health system engagement on the health and well-being of people who use drugs: a realist review protocol.卫生系统参与对吸毒者健康和福祉的影响:一项实在论综述方案
Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 13;11(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01938-z.
8
Using intervention mapping to develop 'ROSE': an intervention to support peer workers in overdose response settings.运用干预映射法制定“ROSE”项目:一项在药物过量应对环境中支持同伴工作者的干预措施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 27;21(1):1279. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07241-2.
9
"It's a Bit of a Double-Edged Sword": Motivation and Personal Impact of Bereaved Mothers' Advocacy for Drug Policy Reform.“这有点双刃剑的味道”:丧亲母亲倡导药物政策改革的动机和个人影响。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Aug;31(10):1812-1822. doi: 10.1177/10497323211006383.
10
"People need them or else they're going to take fentanyl and die": A qualitative study examining the 'problem' of prescription opioid diversion during an overdose epidemic.“人们需要这些药物,否则他们就会去服用芬太尼并死亡”:一项定性研究,探讨过量用药流行期间处方阿片类药物转移的“问题”。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jun;279:113986. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113986. Epub 2021 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
HIV and the criminalisation of drug use among people who inject drugs: a systematic review.HIV 和对注射吸毒者药物使用行为的刑事定罪:系统综述。
Lancet HIV. 2017 Aug;4(8):e357-e374. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30073-5. Epub 2017 May 14.
2
Increased drug use and the timing of social assistance receipt among people who use illicit drugs.吸毒人群中药物使用量的增加及获得社会救助的时间。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Dec;171:94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
3
Structural Vulnerability: Operationalizing the Concept to Address Health Disparities in Clinical Care.结构脆弱性:将这一概念应用于临床护理中以解决健康差异问题。
Acad Med. 2017 Mar;92(3):299-307. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001294.
4
Socioeconomic marginalization and plasma HIV-1 RNA nondetectability among individuals who use illicit drugs in a Canadian setting.加拿大环境下使用非法药物者的社会经济边缘化与血浆HIV-1 RNA检测不到情况
AIDS. 2015 Nov 28;29(18):2487-95. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000853.
5
Socioeconomic marginalisation in the structural production of vulnerability to violence among people who use illicit drugs.在使用非法药物者易受暴力侵害的结构性产生过程中的社会经济边缘化
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jul;69(7):686-92. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205079. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
6
Impact of supervised drug consumption services on access to and engagement with care at a palliative and supportive care facility for people living with HIV/AIDS: a qualitative study.监督下的药物消费服务对艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者在姑息和支持性护理机构获得护理及参与护理的影响:一项定性研究
J Int AIDS Soc. 2014 Mar 13;17(1):18855. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.18855. eCollection 2014.
7
HIV infection among female sex workers in concentrated and high prevalence epidemics: why a structural determinants framework is needed.集中流行和高流行地区女性性工作者中的 HIV 感染:为什么需要一个结构性决定因素框架。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2014 Mar;9(2):174-82. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000042.
8
Employment predicts decreased mortality among HIV-seropositive illicit drug users in a setting of universal HIV care.在普遍提供艾滋病毒护理的环境中,就业预示着艾滋病毒血清阳性的非法药物使用者死亡率降低。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Jan;68(1):93-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-202918. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
9
Interdisciplinary mixed methods research with structurally vulnerable populations: case studies of injection drug users in San Francisco.结构脆弱人群的跨学科混合方法研究:以旧金山注射吸毒者为例
Int J Drug Policy. 2013 Mar;24(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.12.004. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
10
Engaging people who use drugs in policy and program development: a review of the literature.让吸毒者参与政策和项目制定:文献综述。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2012 Nov 24;7:47. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-7-47.

结构性弱势群体(吸毒者)对通过吸毒者组织提供的志愿者津贴和工作经验的看法:机会与限制。

The perspectives of structurally vulnerable people who use drugs on volunteer stipends and work experiences provided through a drug user organization: Opportunities and limitations.

机构信息

British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.

British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Drug Policy. 2018 May;55:40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.004
PMID:29501928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7046180/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While drug user organizations (DUO) have received public health attention as a means to potentially reduce the harms associated with drug use, there is a lack of research on the compensation and structural forces that promote or inhibit participation in DUO. Against the backdrop of structural vulnerability experienced by people who use drugs (PWUD), we examined the impact of monetary 'volunteer stipends' provided through a DUO and explore their role in providing low-threshold employment opportunities and shaping participation in DUO.

METHODS

Participants were purposively sampled to reflect a range of perspectives and experiences volunteering at Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU) and receiving stipends. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 23 members of VANDU. Interview transcripts were coded in Atlas.ti 7 for key a priori themes and emergent categories from the data and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Stipends provided participants with symbolic and material recognition of the time, effort, and expertise they contribute to the organization, and functioned to facilitate ongoing participation. Payments that rewarded, skills, labour and drug-related knowledge reduced participant's perception of stigma against PWUD. Paid work in VANDU further provided participants with non-material benefits commonly attributed to regular employment, including social connections and a sense of purpose. Participants also identified the low level of pay as a limitation of VANDU's paid participation program. The daily demands of survival (accessing shelter, food, and drugs) posed more complex structural vulnerabilities to participate in VANDU, as small stipends were not sufficient to address these needs.

CONCLUSION

Low threshold employment opportunities within DUO may provide significant individual and public health benefits. However, these benefits are constrained by the small size of stipends. Therefore, to ensure better inclusion of PWUD, our findings recommend the development and expansion of equitable, accessible, well-paying employment programs for PWUD.

摘要

背景

虽然毒品使用者组织(DUO)作为一种潜在的减少与吸毒相关危害的手段受到了公共卫生的关注,但对于促进或阻碍参与 DUO 的报酬和结构力量的研究却很少。在吸毒者(PWUD)所经历的结构性脆弱的背景下,我们研究了通过 DUO 提供的金钱“志愿者津贴”的影响,并探讨了它们在提供低门槛就业机会和塑造参与 DUO 方面的作用。

方法

参与者是根据在温哥华毒品使用者网络(VANDU)做志愿者和领取津贴的不同观点和经验有目的地抽取的。对 23 名 VANDU 成员进行了半结构式定性访谈。使用 Atlas.ti 7 对访谈记录进行了编码,以便对预先确定的主题和数据中出现的类别进行分析。

结果

津贴为参与者提供了对他们为组织贡献的时间、努力和专业知识的象征性和物质性认可,并有助于促进他们的持续参与。对技能、劳动和与毒品相关的知识的奖励性报酬降低了参与者对吸毒者的污名化的看法。VANDU 的有偿工作进一步为参与者提供了通常与正规就业相关的非物质利益,包括社交联系和目标感。参与者还指出,VANDU 的有偿参与计划的支付水平低是一个限制。获取住房、食物和毒品等生存需求给参与者参与 VANDU 带来了更多的结构性脆弱性,因为微薄的津贴不足以满足这些需求。

结论

DUO 中的低门槛就业机会可能会给个人和公共卫生带来显著的好处。然而,这些好处受到津贴数额小的限制。因此,为了确保更好地包容吸毒者,我们的研究结果建议为吸毒者制定和扩大公平、可及、高报酬的就业计划。