• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冲击波碎石术或逆行肾内手术:哪一种对儿童10至20毫米肾结石更有效。

Shock wave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery: which one is more effective for 10-20-mm renal stones in children.

作者信息

Ergin Giray, Kirac Mustafa, Kopru Burak, Ebiloglu Turgay, Kibar Yusuf, Biri Hasan

机构信息

Department of Urology, Koru Ankara Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;187(4):1121-1126. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1776-3. Epub 2018 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-018-1776-3
PMID:29502272
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureteroscopy in children with renal stone's diameter of 10 to 20 mm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study including 79 children, who had renal stone and underwent either shock wave lithotripsy or flexible ureteroscopy between January 2007 and June 2017. Of those, 38 patients underwent shock wave lithotripsy assigned as group 1 and 41 patients underwent flexible ureteroscopy assigned as group 2. Stone-free rate, fluoroscopy time, procedure time, complication rates, hospitalization time, and cost-effectiveness were monitored and included in the analyses.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 4.4 ± 3.5 in group 1 and 4.9 ± 4.1 in group 2. Stone-free rate was not different in both groups in the first and third months of follow-up. The mean fluoroscopy time was statistically significantly longer in group 1 compared to group 2. Procedure and hospitalization times were longer in group 2 compared to group 1. No complications were seen in either groups. The expenditure was calculated as 135.23 and 869.41 Euro per patient for groups 1 and 2, respectively, which shows significant higher cost in group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

In this present study, we have shown that shock wave lithotripsy is cheaper, has short hospitalization time and long fluoroscopy time and similar stone-free rate, and has the same efficiency compared to flexible ureteroscopy regarding pediatric renal stones with the diameter between 10 and 20 mm.

摘要

目的

比较冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管镜术治疗直径为10至20毫米肾结石患儿的效果。

材料与方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了79例患有肾结石且在2007年1月至2017年6月期间接受冲击波碎石术或软性输尿管镜术的患儿。其中,38例患者接受冲击波碎石术,分为第1组;41例患者接受软性输尿管镜术,分为第2组。监测无石率、透视时间、手术时间、并发症发生率、住院时间和成本效益,并纳入分析。

结果

第1组患者的平均年龄为4.4±3.5岁,第2组为4.9±4.1岁。在随访的第一个月和第三个月,两组的无石率无差异。第1组的平均透视时间在统计学上显著长于第2组。第2组的手术时间和住院时间比第1组长。两组均未出现并发症。第1组和第2组每位患者的费用分别计算为135.23欧元和869.41欧元,这表明第2组的费用显著更高。

结论

在本研究中,我们表明,对于直径在10至20毫米的小儿肾结石,与软性输尿管镜术相比,冲击波碎石术成本更低,住院时间短,透视时间长,无石率相似,且效率相同。

相似文献

1
Shock wave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery: which one is more effective for 10-20-mm renal stones in children.冲击波碎石术或逆行肾内手术:哪一种对儿童10至20毫米肾结石更有效。
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;187(4):1121-1126. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1776-3. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
2
Retrograde intrarenal surgery monotherapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for stones 10 to 20 mm in preschool children: a prospective, randomized study.经皮肾镜取石术单疗法与冲击波碎石术治疗学龄前儿童 10 至 20 毫米结石:前瞻性、随机研究。
J Urol. 2014 May;191(5 Suppl):1496-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.079. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
3
Outcomes of Flexible Ureteroscopy vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones in Pediatric Patients: A European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.儿童肾结石患者行输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术的疗效比较:欧洲泌尿外科学会尿石症指南系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2023 Dec;210(6):876-887. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003696. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
4
Pediatric ureteroscopic stone management.小儿输尿管镜下结石处理
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):1072-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169159.42821.bc.
5
Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.输尿管软镜联合激光碎石术治疗多发性单侧肾内结石
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.019. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
6
Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy.儿童肾结石的治疗:经皮肾镜取石术与冲击波碎石术的比较
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.080.
7
A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience.一项前瞻性、随机对照研究比较了冲击波碎石术、逆行肾内手术和 miniperc 治疗 1 至 2cm 透光性下盏肾结石:单中心经验。
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):160-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.088. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
8
Shock wave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy: variation in surgical management of kidney stones at freestanding children's hospitals.冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查术:独立儿童医院肾结石手术治疗的差异。
J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
9
Retrograde intrarenal surgery in infants and preschool-age children.逆行性肾内手术在婴儿和学龄前儿童中的应用。
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Nov;46(11):2195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.07.013.
10
Retrograde intrarenal stone surgery for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy-resistant kidney stones.逆行性肾内手术治疗体外冲击波碎石术治疗失败的肾结石
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(5):380-4. doi: 10.1080/00365590600679269.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Early Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Improve the Cost-Effectiveness of Renal Stone Management?早期逆行性肾盂内手术是否提高肾结石管理的成本效益?
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Jun;61(6):515-523. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.6.515.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of micro-PERC and retrograde intrarenal surgery results in pediatric patients with renal stones.比较微经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术在儿童肾结石患者中的结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Dec;13(6):619.e1-619.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
Ultralow Radiation Exposure During Flexible Ureteroscopy in Patients With Nephrolithiasis-How Far Can We Go?肾结石患者行输尿管软镜检查时的超低辐射暴露——我们能走多远?
Urology. 2017 Oct;108:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy in children: Predictors of successful outcome.
儿童体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)单一疗法:成功治疗结果的预测因素。
J Pediatr Urol. 2017 Oct;13(5):515.e1-515.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
4
Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.结石的外科治疗:美国泌尿外科学会/腔内泌尿外科学会指南,第二部分。
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091. Epub 2016 May 27.
5
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
6
The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗小儿尿路结石的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Urolithiasis. 2015 Jun;43(3):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0757-5. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
7
Retrograde intrarenal surgery in pediatric patients.小儿患者的逆行性肾内手术。
World J Nephrol. 2014 Nov 6;3(4):193-7. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i4.193.
8
Retrograde intrarenal surgery monotherapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for stones 10 to 20 mm in preschool children: a prospective, randomized study.经皮肾镜取石术单疗法与冲击波碎石术治疗学龄前儿童 10 至 20 毫米结石:前瞻性、随机研究。
J Urol. 2014 May;191(5 Suppl):1496-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.079. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
9
Treatment of renal stones with flexible ureteroscopy in preschool age children.学龄前儿童输尿管软镜治疗肾结石
Urolithiasis. 2014 Jun;42(3):241-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0636-x. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
10
Treatment of pediatric renal stones in a Western country: a changing pattern.西方国家小儿肾结石的治疗:一种变化的模式。
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Apr;48(4):835-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.09.058.