Pakhomov Serguei V S, Eberly Lynn E, Knopman David S
a College of Pharmacy , University of Minnesota , Minneapolis , MN , USA.
b Division of Biostatistics , University of Minnesota , Minneapolis , MN , USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Oct;40(8):832-840. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2018.1438372. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
Our objective was to examine the association between perseverations produced on the semantic verbal fluency (SVF) task in asymptomatic individuals and the future diagnosis of cognitive impairment (CI).
Participants were individuals participating in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (N = 1269, M = 79.3 years, SD = 5.1; 51% men). All were cognitively normal at baseline and were followed in 15-month intervals for up to 6 visits. Each neurocognitive assessment included SVF tasks ("animals," "fruits," and "vegetables"). Cox modeling was used to test for associations between perseverations and time to CI diagnosis.
Perseverations on the "animals" SVF task were associated with incident CI (hazard ratio = 1.35; 95% confidence interval, CI [1.10, 1.66]). No significant association was found with perseverations on the "fruits" or "vegetables" SVF tasks. Mixed-effects modeling in cognitively normal participants revealed that the number of perseverations at baseline is significantly associated with decline in memory and visuospatial cognitive domains but is not associated with decline in attention.
Assessing perseverations together with standard SVF scores on the "animals" SVF task can help in early identification of asymptomatic individuals at an increased risk for CI. Perseverations are not associated with attention, but rather visual and verbal working memory mechanisms. In longitudinal settings aimed at early detection of signs of CI in presymptomatic individuals, SVF testing with scoring that includes counting of perseverations may potentially serve as a practical alternative to the more cumbersome memory tests.
我们的目的是研究无症状个体在语义言语流畅性(SVF)任务中出现的重复现象与未来认知障碍(CI)诊断之间的关联。
参与者为参加梅奥诊所衰老研究的个体(N = 1269,平均年龄M = 79.3岁,标准差SD = 5.1;男性占51%)。所有参与者在基线时认知功能均正常,每15个月随访一次,最多随访6次。每次神经认知评估均包括SVF任务(“动物”、“水果”和“蔬菜”)。采用Cox模型检验重复现象与CI诊断时间之间的关联。
在“动物”SVF任务中的重复现象与CI发病相关(风险比=1.35;95%置信区间,CI[1.10, 1.66])。在“水果”或“蔬菜”SVF任务中的重复现象未发现显著关联。对认知正常参与者进行的混合效应模型分析显示,基线时的重复次数与记忆和视觉空间认知领域的衰退显著相关,但与注意力衰退无关。
在“动物”SVF任务中,将重复现象与标准SVF分数一起评估,有助于早期识别CI风险增加的无症状个体。重复现象与注意力无关,而是与视觉和言语工作记忆机制有关。在旨在早期检测无症状个体CI迹象的纵向研究中,包括重复次数计数的SVF测试评分可能是一种比更繁琐的记忆测试更实用的替代方法。