• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing within-task verbal fluency performance: the utility of individual time intervals in predicting incident mild cognitive impairment.评估任务内言语流畅性表现:个体时间间隔在预测偶发轻度认知障碍中的效用。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2021 Sep;28(5):733-747. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2020.1817306. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
2
Intraindividual variability in verbal fluency performance is moderated by and predictive of mild cognitive impairments.个体内言语流畅性表现的变异性受轻度认知障碍的调节和预测。
Neuropsychology. 2020 Jan;34(1):31-42. doi: 10.1037/neu0000576. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
Lexical factors and cerebral regions influencing verbal fluency performance in MCI.影响 MCI 患者言语流畅性表现的词汇因素和大脑区域。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Feb;54:98-111. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
4
Mild Cognitive Impairments Moderate the Effect of Time on Verbal Fluency Performance.轻度认知障碍会调节时间对言语流畅性表现的影响。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Jan;23(1):44-55. doi: 10.1017/S1355617716000825. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
5
Performance of cognitive tests, individually and combined, for the detection of cognitive disorders amongst community-dwelling elderly people with memory complaints: the EVATEM study.针对有记忆问题的社区老年人认知障碍检测,单独及联合使用认知测试的效果:EVATEM研究
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Mar;23(3):554-61. doi: 10.1111/ene.12888. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
6
Association of baseline semantic fluency and progression to mild cognitive impairment in middle-aged men.中年男性基线语义流畅性与向轻度认知障碍进展的关联。
Neurology. 2020 Aug 25;95(8):e973-e983. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010130. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Multiple category verbal fluency in mild cognitive impairment and correlation with CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease.轻度认知障碍的多项类别言语流畅性与阿尔茨海默病 CSF 生物标志物的相关性。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jun;29(6):949-958. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000102. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Association Between Mentally Stimulating Activities in Late Life and the Outcome of Incident Mild Cognitive Impairment, With an Analysis of the APOE ε4 Genotype.晚年进行脑力刺激活动与轻度认知障碍发病结果之间的关联,并分析 APOE ε4 基因型的作用。
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):332-338. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3822.
9
Semantic and Phonemic Verbal Fluency Discrepancy in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Potential Predictor of Progression to Alzheimer's Disease.语义和语音流畅性在轻度认知障碍中的差异:向阿尔茨海默病进展的潜在预测指标。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):755-759. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15294. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
10
Typicality of words produced on a semantic fluency task in amnesic mild cognitive impairment: linguistic analysis and risk of conversion to dementia.遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者在语义流畅性任务中所生成词汇的典型性:语言分析及转化为痴呆症的风险
J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42(4):1171-8. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140570.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging relatedness-based measures in people with language disorders: A scoping review.在语言障碍患者中利用基于关联性的测量方法:一项范围综述。
J Neuropsychol. 2025 Jun;19(2):299-337. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12405. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
2
What Are the Reliable Plasma Biomarkers for Mild Cognitive Impairment? A Clinical 4D Proteomics Study and Validation.哪些是轻度认知障碍的可靠血浆生物标志物?一项临床 4D 蛋白质组学研究及验证。
Mediators Inflamm. 2024 May 27;2024:7709277. doi: 10.1155/2024/7709277. eCollection 2024.
3
Meta-analysis of Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) FAS performance in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and cognitively unimpaired older adults.遗忘型轻度认知障碍和认知未受损老年人的受控口语词语联想测验(COWAT)全分析集(FAS)表现的荟萃分析。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023 Jul-Aug;30(4):424-430. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1952590. Epub 2021 Aug 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping brain asymmetry in health and disease through the ENIGMA consortium.通过 ENIGMA 联盟绘制健康和疾病中的大脑不对称性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Jan;43(1):167-181. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25033. Epub 2020 May 18.
2
The validity and reliability of quantifying hemispheric specialisation using fMRI: Evidence from left and right handers on three different cerebral asymmetries.使用 fMRI 量化大脑偏侧化的有效性和可靠性:来自左利手和右利手三种不同大脑不对称性的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107331. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107331. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
Verbal fluency as a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.言语流畅性作为轻度认知障碍的筛查工具。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Sep;32(9):1055-1062. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000644. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
4
Intraindividual variability in verbal fluency performance is moderated by and predictive of mild cognitive impairments.个体内言语流畅性表现的变异性受轻度认知障碍的调节和预测。
Neuropsychology. 2020 Jan;34(1):31-42. doi: 10.1037/neu0000576. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
5
COWAT Performance of Persons with Alzheimer Dementia, Vascular Dementia, and Parkinson Disease Dementia According to Stage of Cognitive Impairment.根据认知障碍阶段评估阿尔茨海默病、血管性痴呆和帕金森病痴呆患者的 COWAT 表现。
PM R. 2019 Jul;11(7):737-744. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12125. Epub 2019 May 7.
6
Semantic and Phonemic Verbal Fluency Discrepancy in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Potential Predictor of Progression to Alzheimer's Disease.语义和语音流畅性在轻度认知障碍中的差异:向阿尔茨海默病进展的潜在预测指标。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):755-759. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15294. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
7
Recurrent perseverations on semantic verbal fluency tasks as an early marker of cognitive impairment.语义言语流畅性任务中的反复持续性表现作为认知障碍的早期标志物。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Oct;40(8):832-840. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2018.1438372. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
8
Semantic verbal fluency impairment is detectable in patients with subjective cognitive decline.在主观认知衰退患者中可检测到语义言语流畅性受损。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2018 Sep-Oct;25(5):448-457. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2017.1326047. Epub 2017 May 26.
9
Dementia in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病中的痴呆
J Neurol Sci. 2017 Mar 15;374:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
10
Mild Cognitive Impairments Moderate the Effect of Time on Verbal Fluency Performance.轻度认知障碍会调节时间对言语流畅性表现的影响。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Jan;23(1):44-55. doi: 10.1017/S1355617716000825. Epub 2016 Oct 17.

评估任务内言语流畅性表现:个体时间间隔在预测偶发轻度认知障碍中的效用。

Assessing within-task verbal fluency performance: the utility of individual time intervals in predicting incident mild cognitive impairment.

机构信息

Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY, USA.

Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2021 Sep;28(5):733-747. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2020.1817306. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1080/13825585.2020.1817306
PMID:32901518
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7940454/
Abstract

The current study aimed to determine whether word generation performance on individual within-task 20-second time intervals predicted conversion to Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) status. Longitudinal data (Mean follow-up=2.95±1.64 years) was collected from cognitively-healthy community-dwelling older adults (=344; %female=56.1). Performance on letter and semantic fluency tasks was divided into three consecutive within-task 20-second intervals. Incident MCI status (=50) was determined via established diagnostic case conference. Fully adjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression models revealed that greater word production on semantic fluency across all time intervals significantly predicted a reduced risk of incident MCI [0-20 seconds (HR=0.906, =0.002), 21-40 seconds (HR=0.904, =0.02), and 41-60 seconds (HR=0.892, =0.017)]. Conversely, on letter fluency, greater word production within the 41-60 second time interval only was significantly associated with reduced risk of incident MCI (HR=0.886, =0.002). Overall, the clinical use of within-interval performance is supported given evidence of predictive sensitivity and ease of administration.

摘要

本研究旨在确定个体在单个任务 20 秒时间间隔内的单词生成表现是否能预测其向轻度认知障碍(MCI)状态的转化。本研究收集了认知健康的社区居住老年人的纵向数据(平均随访时间=2.95±1.64 年,n=344;女性占比 56.1%)。在字母和语义流畅性任务中,将表现分为三个连续的 20 秒时间间隔。通过既定的诊断病例会议确定新发病例的 MCI 状态(n=50)。完全调整的 Cox 比例风险回归模型显示,在所有时间间隔内,语义流畅性的单词生成量越大,发生 MCI 的风险越低[0-20 秒(HR=0.906,p=0.002),21-40 秒(HR=0.904,p=0.02)和 41-60 秒(HR=0.892,p=0.017)]。相反,在字母流畅性中,只有在 41-60 秒时间间隔内的单词生成量与 MCI 发生风险降低显著相关(HR=0.886,p=0.002)。总的来说,考虑到预测敏感性和易于管理的证据,支持使用间隔内表现进行临床应用。