Suppr超能文献

想到窒息了吗?注意力过程与矛盾表现。

Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance.

作者信息

Lewis Brian P, Linder Darwyn E

机构信息

Arizona State University,

Arizona State University.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1997 Sep;23(9):937-944. doi: 10.1177/0146167297239003.

Abstract

When pressure to perform is increased, individuals commonly perform worse than if there were no pressure ("choking under pressure'). Two mechanisms have been proposed to account for this effect-distraction (cognitive load), wherein pressure distracts attention from the task, and self focus, wherein attention shifts inward interfering with performance. To distinguish between these two competing explanations, the current experiment manipulated pressure by offering performance-contingent rewards. For half the participants, cognitive load was increased by requiring participants to count backward from 100. Additionally, adaptation to self awareness was manipulated by videotaping half the participants during practice trials. Results show that pressure caused choking when participants were not distracted and had not been adapted to self awareness. This effect was attenuated when cognitive load was increased or when self-awareness adaptation had occurred. These results support self focus mediated misregulation as the mechanism for choking and disconfirm the distraction hypothesis.

摘要

当执行任务的压力增加时,个体的表现通常会比没有压力时更差(“压力下发挥失常”)。人们提出了两种机制来解释这种效应——分心(认知负荷),即压力将注意力从任务上转移开;以及自我关注,即注意力向内转移从而干扰表现。为了区分这两种相互竞争的解释,当前的实验通过提供与表现挂钩的奖励来操纵压力。对于一半的参与者,通过要求他们从100开始倒数来增加认知负荷。此外,通过在练习试验期间对一半的参与者进行录像来操纵对自我意识的适应。结果表明,当参与者没有分心且没有适应自我意识时,压力会导致发挥失常。当认知负荷增加或发生自我意识适应时,这种效应会减弱。这些结果支持自我关注介导的调节失调作为发挥失常的机制,并否定了分心假说。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验