• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成败关键:预期挑战与回报对认知努力付出相关动机与体验的影响。

Make or Break: The Influence of Expected Challenges and Rewards on the Motivation and Experience Associated with Cognitive Effort Exertion.

机构信息

University of Michigan.

University of California, Berkeley.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Dec 1;36(12):2863-2885. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02247.

DOI:10.1162/jocn_a_02247
PMID:39270147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11602009/
Abstract

Challenging goals can induce harder work but also greater stress, in turn potentially undermining goal achievement. We sought to examine how mental effort and subjective experiences thereof interact as a function of the challenge level and the size of the incentives at stake. Participants performed a task that rewarded individual units of effort investment (correctly performed Stroop trials) but only if they met a threshold number of correct trials within a fixed time interval (challenge level). We varied this challenge level (Study 1, n = 40) and the rewards at stake (Study 2, n = 79) and measured variability in task performance and self-reported affect across task intervals. Greater challenge and higher rewards facilitated greater effort investment but also induced greater stress, whereas higher rewards (and lower challenge) simultaneously induced greater positive affect. Within intervals, we observed an initial speed up then slowdown in performance, which could reflect dynamic reconfiguration of control. Collectively, these findings further our understanding of the influence of task demands and incentives on mental effort exertion and well-being.

摘要

具有挑战性的目标可以促使人们更加努力地工作,但也会带来更大的压力,从而有可能破坏目标的实现。我们试图研究在多大程度上,精神努力及其主观体验会随着挑战水平和奖励大小的变化而相互作用。参与者完成了一项任务,该任务奖励个人努力投入的单位(正确完成斯特鲁普试验),但前提是他们在固定时间间隔内达到正确试验的阈值数量(挑战水平)。我们在研究 1(n=40)中改变了这一挑战水平,在研究 2(n=79)中改变了奖励大小,并在任务间隔内测量了任务表现和自我报告的情感的可变性。更大的挑战和更高的奖励促进了更大的努力投入,但也带来了更大的压力,而更高的奖励(和更低的挑战)同时带来了更大的积极影响。在间隔内,我们观察到最初的速度加快,然后是速度减慢,这可能反映了控制的动态重新配置。总的来说,这些发现进一步加深了我们对任务需求和激励对精神努力和幸福感的影响的理解。

相似文献

1
Make or Break: The Influence of Expected Challenges and Rewards on the Motivation and Experience Associated with Cognitive Effort Exertion.成败关键:预期挑战与回报对认知努力付出相关动机与体验的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Dec 1;36(12):2863-2885. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02247.
2
Make or break: The influence of expected challenges and rewards on the motivation and experience associated with cognitive effort exertion.成败在此一举:预期挑战和回报对与认知努力付出相关的动机和体验的影响。
bioRxiv. 2024 Aug 28:2023.12.05.570154. doi: 10.1101/2023.12.05.570154.
3
The effect of subliminal incentives on goal-directed eye movements.阈下激励对目标导向眼球运动的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Dec 1;126(6):2014-2026. doi: 10.1152/jn.00414.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Encodes the Integrated Incentive Motivational Value of Cognitive Task Performance.背侧前扣带回皮层对认知任务表现的综合激励动机价值进行编码。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 21;41(16):3707-3720. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2550-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
5
Long-lasting effects of performance-contingent unconscious and conscious reward incentives during cued task-switching.在提示任务转换期间,基于表现的无意识和意识奖励激励的持久影响。
Cortex. 2013 Jul-Aug;49(7):1943-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
6
Abnormal cognitive effort allocation and its association with amotivation in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病患者异常认知努力分配及其与动机缺乏的关系。
Psychol Med. 2020 Nov;50(15):2599-2609. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002769. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
7
Frontal midline theta power during the cue-target-interval reflects increased cognitive effort in rewarded task-switching.额中线θ功率在提示-目标间隔期间反映了在奖励任务转换中增加的认知努力。
Cortex. 2024 Nov;180:94-110. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.08.004. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
8
Rewarding cognitive effort increases the intrinsic value of mental labor.奖励认知努力会增加脑力劳动的内在价值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 1;119(5). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111785119.
9
Cognitive performance in pain is predicted by effort, not goal desire.疼痛中的认知表现由努力程度决定,而不是目标愿望决定。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 4;16(11):e0258874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258874. eCollection 2021.
10
Association between cognitive function and performance on effort based decision making in patients with major depressive disorder treated with Vortioxetine.文拉法辛治疗的重性抑郁障碍患者认知功能与基于努力的决策表现之间的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;94:152113. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Motivation and Decision-making.动机与决策的神经与计算机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Dec 1;36(12):2822-2830. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02258.
2
The affective gradient hypothesis: an affect-centered account of motivated behavior.情感梯度假说:一种以情感为中心的动机行为解释。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Dec;28(12):1089-1104. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.08.003. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Motivational context determines the impact of aversive outcomes on mental effort allocation.激励背景决定了厌恶结果对心理努力分配的影响。
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105973. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105973. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Proximity to rewards modulates parameters of effortful control exertion.接近奖励调节努力控制发挥的参数。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 May;153(5):1257-1267. doi: 10.1037/xge0001561. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
3
An integrative effort: Bridging motivational intensity theory and recent neurocomputational and neuronal models of effort and control allocation.一项综合性的努力:弥合动机强度理论与最近的神经计算和神经元努力与控制分配模型之间的差距。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jul;130(4):1081-1103. doi: 10.1037/rev0000372. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Cognitive Control as a Multivariate Optimization Problem.认知控制作为一个多元优化问题。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Mar 5;34(4):569-591. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01822.
5
Dissociable influences of reward and punishment on adaptive cognitive control.奖赏和惩罚对适应性认知控制的可分离影响。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Dec 28;17(12):e1009737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009737. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Decomposing the motivation to exert mental effort.剖析付出脑力努力的动机。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2021 Aug 1;30(4):307-314. doi: 10.1177/09637214211009510. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
7
Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation.期望奖励和效能指导认知控制分配。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 15;12(1):1030. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21315-z.
8
Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance.想到窒息了吗?注意力过程与矛盾表现。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1997 Sep;23(9):937-944. doi: 10.1177/0146167297239003.
9
The Effort Paradox: Effort Is Both Costly and Valued.努力悖论:努力既昂贵又有价值。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
10
Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort.迈向对心理努力的理性与机械论解释
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526. Epub 2017 Mar 31.