• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comment on: Clinical Validity, Understandability, and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculators: Systematic Review.

作者信息

Sisa Ivan

机构信息

School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 5;20(3):e10093. doi: 10.2196/10093.

DOI:10.2196/10093
PMID:29506971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5859206/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Comment on: Clinical Validity, Understandability, and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculators: Systematic Review.关于《在线心血管疾病风险计算器的临床有效性、可理解性及可操作性：系统评价》的评论
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 5;20(3):e10093. doi: 10.2196/10093.
2
Clinical Validity, Understandability, and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculators: Systematic Review.在线心血管疾病风险计算器的临床有效性、可理解性及可操作性：系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 1;20(2):e29. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8538.
3
Favourable understandability, but poor actionability: An evaluation of online type 2 diabetes risk calculators.可理解性良好，但可操作性差：在线 2 型糖尿病风险计算器评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):467-473. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
4
Understandability and Actionability of Online Information on Hypertension.
Popul Health Manag. 2019 Aug;22(4):369. doi: 10.1089/pop.2019.0037. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
5
Understandability and Actionability of the CDC'S Printable Sepsis Patient Education Material.了解和执行 CDC 的可打印脓毒症患者教育材料的能力。
Am J Crit Care. 2018 Sep;27(5):418-427. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2018121.
6
The effects of infographics and several quantitative versus qualitative formats for cardiovascular disease risk, including heart age, on people's risk understanding.信息图和几种心血管疾病风险（包括心龄）的定量与定性格式对人们风险认知的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Aug;101(8):1410-1418. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
7
Development and evaluation of an integrated diabetes-periodontitis nutrition and health education module.开发和评估综合糖尿病-牙周炎营养与健康教育培训模块。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 May 17;21(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02721-9.
8
Understandability and Actionability: Using the PEMAT to Benefit Health Literacy.可理解性与可操作性：运用PEMAT提升健康素养。
Holist Nurs Pract. 2019 May/Jun;33(3):191-193. doi: 10.1097/HNP.0000000000000327.
9
Readability and Understandability of Online Vocal Cord Paralysis Materials.在线声带麻痹资料的可读性和易懂性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Mar;154(3):460-4. doi: 10.1177/0194599815626146. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
10
Health Literacy Demand of Printed Lifestyle Patient Information Materials Aimed at People With Chronic Kidney Disease: Are Materials Easy to Understand and Act On and Do They Use Meaningful Visual Aids?针对慢性肾病患者的印刷版生活方式患者信息材料的健康素养需求：这些材料是否易于理解和付诸行动，以及它们是否使用了有意义的视觉辅助工具？
J Health Commun. 2017 Feb;22(2):163-170. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1258744. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A classification system for identifying persons with an unknown cardiovascular disease (CVD) status for a multiracial/ ethnic Caribbean population.一种用于识别多种族/族裔加勒比人群中具有未知心血管疾病 (CVD) 状况的人员的分类系统。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 22;12:e17948. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17948. eCollection 2024.
2
Dose study of rosuvastatin calcium in the treatment of coronary heart disease and hyperlipidemia.瑞舒伐他汀钙治疗冠心病和高脂血症的剂量研究。
Am J Transl Res. 2023 May 15;15(5):3403-3409. eCollection 2023.
3
Influences of a hierarchical nursing model on rescue outcomes and nursing quality of patients with acute cerebral infarction.层级护理模式对急性脑梗死患者抢救结局及护理质量的影响
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):6498-6506. eCollection 2021.
4
Evaluating Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) risk scores for participants with known CVD and non-CVD in a multiracial/ethnic Caribbean sample.在一个多种族/族裔的加勒比样本中，评估已知患有心血管疾病（CVD）和未患心血管疾病的参与者的心血管疾病风险评分。
PeerJ. 2020 Mar 9;8:e8232. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8232. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical Validity, Understandability, and Actionability of Online Cardiovascular Disease Risk Calculators: Systematic Review.在线心血管疾病风险计算器的临床有效性、可理解性及可操作性：系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 1;20(2):e29. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8538.
2
Cardiovascular risk assessment: a global perspective.心血管风险评估：全球视角。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 May;12(5):301-11. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.28. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
3
Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project.欧洲致命性心血管疾病十年风险评估：SCORE项目
Eur Heart J. 2003 Jun;24(11):987-1003. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00114-3.