Ludwigsburg University of Education, 71634, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
University of Trier, 54286, Trier, Germany.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):636-642. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1450-9.
We examined how the provision of feedback affected two separate effects of retrieval practice: strengthening of practiced information and forgetting of related, unpracticed information. Feedback substantially increased recall of retrieval-practiced items. This unsurprising result shows once again that restudy opportunities boost the benefits of testing. In contrast, retrieval-induced forgetting was unaffected by the manipulation and occurred in equal size with or without feedback. These findings demonstrate strength independence of retrieval-induced forgetting and thus support a theoretical account assuming that an inhibitory mechanism causes retrieval-induced forgetting. According to this theory, inhibition resolves competition that arises during retrieval attempts but is unrelated to the consequences of retrieval practice concerning practiced items. The present results match these assumptions and contradict the theoretical alternative that blocking by strengthened information might explain retrieval-induced forgetting. We discuss our findings against the background of previous studies.
已练习信息的强化和相关未练习信息的遗忘。反馈显著提高了检索练习项目的回忆。这个不出所料的结果再次表明,复习机会增强了测试的益处。相比之下,检索诱发的遗忘不受操作的影响,无论是否有反馈,其遗忘量都相同。这些发现证明了检索诱发遗忘的强度独立性,从而支持了一个理论解释,该解释假设抑制机制导致了检索诱发遗忘。根据该理论,抑制解决了在检索尝试中出现的竞争,但与检索练习对已练习项目的后果无关。目前的结果与这些假设一致,与理论替代方案相矛盾,该替代方案认为,强化信息的阻断可能解释检索诱发的遗忘。我们根据先前的研究讨论了我们的发现。