“妈妈有避孕药”：安东尼·康斯托克和格里斯沃尔德诉康涅狄格州案如何塑造美国的生育方式。
"Momma's Got the Pill": How Anthony Comstock and Griswold v. Connecticut Shaped US Childbearing.
机构信息
Department of Economics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
出版信息
Am Econ Rev. 2010 Mar;100(1):98-129. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.1.98.
Abstract
The 1960s ushered in a new era in US demographic history characterized by significantly lower fertility rates and smaller family sizes. What catalyzed these changes remains a matter of considerable debate. This paper exploits idiosyncratic variation in the language of "Comstock" statutes, enacted in the late 1800s, to quantify the role of the birth control pill in this transition. Almost 50 years after the contraceptive pill appeared on the US market, this analysis provides new evidence that it accelerated the post-1960 decline in marital fertility.
摘要
20 世纪 60 年代，美国迎来了一个新的人口历史时代，其特点是生育率显著下降和家庭规模缩小。是什么催化了这些变化仍然是一个相当有争议的问题。本文利用“科姆斯托克”法规（Comstock laws）语言的特有变化，来量化避孕药在这一转变中的作用。避孕药在美国市场出现近 50 年后，这项分析提供了新的证据，表明它加速了 20 世纪 60 年代后婚姻生育率的下降。
相似文献
1
"Momma's Got the Pill": How Anthony Comstock and Griswold v. Connecticut Shaped US Childbearing.
Am Econ Rev. 2010 Mar;100(1):98-129. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.1.98.
2
Introduction of the pill and its impact.
Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1 Suppl):11S-16S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00131-0.
3
Career and Marriage in the Age of the Pill.
Am Econ Rev. 2000;90(2):461-5. doi: 10.1257/aer.90.2.461.
4
[Contraceptive failure in the United States: the impact of social economic and demographic factors (author's transl)].
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris). 1983 Apr;11(4):659-73.
5
Trends in contraceptive use according to HIV status among privately insured women in the United States.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;217(6):676.e1-676.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
6
The effects of contraception on female poverty.
J Policy Anal Manage. 2014 Summer;33(3):602-22. doi: 10.1002/pam.21761.
7
Why is the teen birth rate in the United States so high and why does it matter?
J Econ Perspect. 2012 Spring;26(2):141-66. doi: 10.1257/jep.26.2.141.
8
Contraception in the prepill era.
Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1 Suppl):7S-10S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00130-9.
9
The Contraceptive Pill in Ireland 1964-79: Activism, Women and Patient-Doctor Relationships.
Med Hist. 2020 Apr;64(2):195-218. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2020.3.
10
Hormonal contraceptive use and discontinuation because of dissatisfaction: differences by race and education.
Demography. 2012 Nov;49(4):1433-52. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0127-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Twentieth-Century Change in the Educational Costs of Adolescent Childbearing.
AJS. 2024 May;129(6):1763-1791. doi: 10.1086/729819.
2
Age at first birth and women's midlife health: Cohort and race differences across the 20th century.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Aug;331:116097. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116097. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
3
Economic opportunity begins with contraception: Comment on "Intergenerational Mobility Begins Before Birth" by Ananth Seshadri, Anson Zhou.
J Monet Econ. 2022 Jul;129:21-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 18.
4
The Missing Baby Bust: The Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Contraceptive Use, Pregnancy, and Childbirth Among Low-Income Women.
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41(4):1549-1569. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09703-9. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
5
Social vulnerability and aging of elderly people in the United States.
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Sep 20;16:100924. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100924. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
The children of the missed pill.
J Health Econ. 2021 Sep;79:102496. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102496. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
7
The Demographic Effects of Dodging the Vietnam Draft.
AEA Pap Proc. 2020 May;110:220-225. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20201106.
8
The Development of Global Women's Rights and Improvements in Reproductive Health Intervention Access of Females with Different Socio-Economic Status.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 28;16(23):4783. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16234783.
9
Five Decades of Remarkable but Slowing Change in U.S. Women's Economic and Social Status and Political Participation.
RSF. 2016 Aug;2(4):1-32. doi: 10.7758/rsf.2016.2.4.01. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
10
Economic Benefits of Investing in Women's Health: A Systematic Review.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0150120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150120. eCollection 2016.
本文引用的文献
1
Family Inequality: Diverging Patterns in Marriage, Cohabitation, and Childbearing.
J Econ Perspect. 2016;30(2):79-102. doi: 10.1257/jep.30.2.79.
2
Fertility effects of abortion and birth control pill access for minors.
Demography. 2008 Nov;45(4):817-27. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0026.
3
Black market birth control: contraceptive entrepreneurship and criminality in the Gilded Age.
J Am Hist. 2000;87(2):435-59.
4
Further results from a human fertility model with a variety of pregnancy outcomes.
Hum Biol. 1966 Sep;38(3):180-93.
5
Population policy for Americans: is the government being misled?
Science. 1969 May 2;164(3879):522-9. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3879.522.
6
Coital frequency and contraception.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1974 Summer;6(3):136-41.
7
Pregnancy, teenagers and the law, 1976.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1976 Jan-Feb;8(1):16-21.
8
The yield of the imperfect: the 1970 National Fertility Study.
Demography. 1975 Nov;12(4):573-80.
9
The U.S. fertility decline, 1961-1975: the contribution of changes in marital status and marital fertility.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1976 Sep-Oct;8(5):249-52.
Zotero 插件