Suppr超能文献

用电容和辐射系统对深部肿瘤进行局部区域性高温治疗:一项模拟研究。

Locoregional hyperthermia of deep-seated tumours applied with capacitive and radiative systems: a simulation study.

机构信息

a Department of Radiation Oncology , Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.

b Department of Medical Physics , Regional University Hospital of Málaga , Malaga , Spain.

出版信息

Int J Hyperthermia. 2018 Sep;34(6):714-730. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1448119. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Locoregional hyperthermia is applied to deep-seated tumours in the pelvic region. Two very different heating techniques are often applied: capacitive and radiative heating. In this paper, numerical simulations are applied to compare the performance of both techniques in heating of deep-seated tumours.

METHODS

Phantom simulations were performed for small (30 × 20 × 50 cm) and large (45 × 30 × 50 cm), homogeneous fatless and inhomogeneous fat-muscle, tissue-equivalent phantoms with a central or eccentric target region. Radiative heating was simulated with the 70 MHz AMC-4 system and capacitive heating was simulated at 13.56 MHz. Simulations were performed for small fatless, small (i.e. fat layer typically <2 cm) and large (i.e. fat layer typically >3 cm) patients with cervix, prostate, bladder and rectum cancer. Temperature distributions were simulated using constant hyperthermic-level perfusion values with tissue constraints of 44 °C and compared for both heating techniques.

RESULTS

For the small homogeneous phantom, similar target heating was predicted with radiative and capacitive heating. For the large homogeneous phantom, most effective target heating was predicted with capacitive heating. For inhomogeneous phantoms, hot spots in the fat layer limit adequate capacitive heating, and simulated target temperatures with radiative heating were 2-4 °C higher. Patient simulations predicted therapeutic target temperatures with capacitive heating for fatless patients, but radiative heating was more robust for all tumour sites and patient sizes, yielding target temperatures 1-3 °C higher than those predicted for capacitive heating.

CONCLUSION

Generally, radiative locoregional heating yields more favourable simulated temperature distributions for deep-seated pelvic tumours, compared with capacitive heating. Therapeutic temperatures are predicted for capacitive heating in patients with (almost) no fat.

摘要

背景

局部高温疗法应用于盆腔深部肿瘤。通常应用两种截然不同的加热技术:电容加热和辐射加热。本文应用数值模拟比较这两种技术在深部肿瘤加热中的性能。

方法

对小(30×20×50cm)大和大(45×30×50cm)、无脂肪均质和非均质脂肪-肌肉、组织等效体模进行了仿体模拟,其中有中心或偏心靶区。辐射加热用 70MHz AMC-4 系统模拟,电容加热用 13.56MHz 模拟。对小无脂肪、小(即脂肪层通常<2cm)和大(即脂肪层通常>3cm)的宫颈癌、前列腺癌、膀胱癌和直肠癌患者进行了模拟。使用组织约束为 44°C 的恒定高温水平灌注值模拟温度分布,并比较了两种加热技术。

结果

对于小的均质体模,辐射和电容加热预测的靶区加热相似。对于大的均质体模,电容加热预测的靶区加热最有效。对于非均质体模,脂肪层中的热点限制了有效的电容加热,辐射加热预测的靶区温度比电容加热高 2-4°C。对于无脂肪患者,电容加热预测的治疗靶区温度,但对于所有肿瘤部位和患者大小,辐射加热更稳健,预测的靶区温度比电容加热高 1-3°C。

结论

与电容加热相比,辐射局部高温疗法通常为盆腔深部肿瘤提供更有利的模拟温度分布。电容加热可预测有(几乎)无脂肪患者的治疗温度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验