• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球会阴切开术的统计趋势:对不断变化的实践的比较性系统评价。

Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: Comparative systematic review of changing practices.

作者信息

Clesse Christophe, Lighezzolo-Alnot Joëlle, De Lavergne Sylvie, Hamlin Sandrine, Scheffler Michèle

机构信息

a Interpsy Laboratory (EA4432) , Université de Lorraine , Nancy , France.

b Hospital Centre of Jury-les-Metz - Route d'Ars Laquenexy , Jury , France.

出版信息

Health Care Women Int. 2018 Jun;39(6):644-662. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1445253. Epub 2018 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1080/07399332.2018.1445253
PMID:29509098
Abstract

The authors' purpose for this article is to identify, review and interpret all publications about the episiotomy rates worldwide. Based on the criteria from the PRISMA guidelines, twenty databases were scrutinized. All studies which include national statistics related to episiotomy were selected, as well as studies presenting estimated data. Sixty-one papers were selected with publication dates between 1995 and 2016. A static and dynamic analysis of all the results was carried out. The assumption for the decline in the number of episiotomies is discussed and confirmed, recalling that nowadays high rates of episiotomy remain in less industrialized countries and East Asia. Finally, our analysis aims to investigate the potential determinants which influence apparent statistical disparities.

摘要

本文作者的目的是识别、回顾和解读全球范围内所有关于会阴切开率的出版物。基于PRISMA指南的标准,对20个数据库进行了审查。所有包含与会阴切开相关的国家统计数据的研究以及呈现估计数据的研究均被选中。选取了61篇发表于1995年至2016年之间的论文。对所有结果进行了静态和动态分析。讨论并证实了会阴切开术数量下降的假设,同时指出如今在工业化程度较低的国家和东亚地区,会阴切开率仍然很高。最后,我们的分析旨在调查影响明显统计差异的潜在决定因素。

相似文献

1
Statistical trends of episiotomy around the world: Comparative systematic review of changing practices.全球会阴切开术的统计趋势:对不断变化的实践的比较性系统评价。
Health Care Women Int. 2018 Jun;39(6):644-662. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1445253. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
2
[What are the epidemiologic data in regard to episiotomy?].关于会阴切开术有哪些流行病学数据?
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2006 Feb;35(1 Suppl):1S12-1S23.
3
Can major systematic reviews influence practice patterns? A case study of episiotomy trends.主要的系统评价能影响实践模式吗?会阴切开术趋势的案例研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;288(6):1285-93. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2904-y. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
4
[The practice of episiotomy in France 10 years after the recommendations of CNGOF: What inventory?].[法国国家妇产科和妇科学会(CNGOF)发布建议10年后法国的会阴切开术实施情况:有哪些情况?]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016 Apr;44(4):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
5
Factors related to episiotomy practice: an evidence-based medicine systematic review.与会阴切开术实施相关的因素:一项循证医学系统评价
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Aug;39(6):737-747. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1581741. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Socio-historical evolution of the episiotomy practice: A literature review.会阴切开术实践的社会历史演变:文献综述
Women Health. 2019 Aug;59(7):760-774. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2018.1553814. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
7
Trends in and Factors Associated With Episiotomy in the Setting of Nonoperative Vaginal Delivery, 2000-2018.2000 - 2018年非手术阴道分娩时会阴切开术的趋势及相关因素
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan 1;139(1):110-112. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004631.
8
Implementation of the RCOG guidelines for prevention of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) at two London Hospitals: A time series analysis.伦敦两家医院实施皇家妇产科医师学院预防产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS)指南:一项时间序列分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 May;224:89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
9
Variations in rates of severe perineal tears and episiotomies in 20 European countries: a study based on routine national data in Euro-Peristat Project.20个欧洲国家严重会阴撕裂和会阴切开术发生率的差异:一项基于欧洲围产期统计项目国家常规数据的研究
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Jul;95(7):746-54. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12894. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
10
Episiotomy and perineal repair practices among obstetricians in Greece.希腊产科医生的会阴切开术和会阴修复实践
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;106(1):27-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.013. Epub 2009 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
High-rebound sponge as a simulation tool for perineal suture.高回弹海绵作为会阴缝合的模拟工具。
Can Fam Physician. 2025 Mar;71(3):177-178. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7103177.
2
The prevalence of episiotomy and associated factors at Shahrara Teaching Hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan.阿富汗喀布尔沙赫拉腊教学医院会阴切开术的患病率及相关因素
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07190-2.
3
Effects of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation on pain after episiotomy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
经皮电神经刺激对会阴切开术后疼痛的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 31;11(1):e41577. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41577. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
4
Episiotomies and obstetric anal sphincter injuries following a restrictive episiotomy policy in France: An analysis of the 2010, 2016, and 2021 National Perinatal Surveys.法国采用限制性会阴切开术政策后的会阴切开术和产科肛门括约肌损伤:对2010年、2016年和2021年全国围产期调查的分析。
PLoS Med. 2025 Jan 14;22(1):e1004501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004501. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Prevalence and predictors of episiotomy among puerperal women accessing postnatal care in the Kumasi Metropolis.产后妇女在库马西大都市区接受产后护理时会阴切开术的流行情况和预测因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):750. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06967-1.
6
Analysis of episiotomy incidence and risk factors in vaginal deliveries: a single-center.阴道分娩中会阴切开术发生率及危险因素分析:单中心研究
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Jul 17;4(3):100371. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100371. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
A Systematic Review of the Use of Routine Versus Selective Episiotomy for Vaginal Birth.经阴道分娩常规侧切与选择性侧切应用的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65865. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65865. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
The effect of Camellia sinensis ointment on perineal pain and episiotomy wound healing in primiparous women: A triple-blind randomized clinical trial.茶花软膏对初产妇会阴部疼痛及会阴侧切伤口愈合的影响:一项三盲随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0305048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305048. eCollection 2024.
9
Obstetric interventions' effects on the birthing experience.产科干预措施对分娩体验的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 27;24(1):508. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06626-5.
10
Prevalence of episiotomy and associated factors among women who gave birth at public health facilities in Jigjiga town, eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚东部吉吉加镇公共卫生设施分娩妇女中会阴切开术的患病率及相关因素:一项横断面研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 20;4(5):e0003216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003216. eCollection 2024.