• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2017 年结直肠外科学会三方会议与会者的社交媒体参与度:当代社交媒体使用情况的最新动态。

Social media engagement amongst 2017 colorectal surgery Tripartite Meeting attendees: updates on contemporary social media use.

机构信息

Department of Renal Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;20(5):O114-O118. doi: 10.1111/codi.14058.

DOI:10.1111/codi.14058
PMID:29509990
Abstract

AIM

Engagement by medical professionals with social media (SM) is increasing. Variation is noted in engagement between SM platforms and between surgical specialities and geographical regions. We aimed to study SM engagement by colorectal surgeons attending an international conference.

METHOD

Surgeons were identified from the delegate list of the 2017 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Tripartite Meeting (Seattle, Washington, USA). Delegates were searched on Twitter and LinkedIn for the presence of a matching profile. SM presence, activity, gender and geographical region were analysed.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy (13.2%) surgeons had Twitter accounts and 994 (44.3%) had LinkedIn profiles. UK surgeons were more likely to be on Twitter than surgeons from elsewhere (23.4% vs 12.7%, P = 0.0072). Significant variation in SM membership between each geographical region was noted, with usage rates for Twitter of 18.1% in Europe, 14.4% in North America, 12.9% in South America, 4.3% in Oceania, 3.7% in Asia and 0% in Africa. A similar picture for LinkedIn is seen. The #ASCRS17 meeting saw the highest participation of users to date (979 participants, over 7000 individual tweets and nearly 14 million impressions).

CONCLUSION

SM engagement by colorectal surgeons continues to increase. Significant geographical variation is noted, suggesting that SM's unique potential for education and networking may not yet be widely appreciated globally. Future work should include further analysis into tweet contents to gain insights and optimize the use of SM as an educational adjunct.

摘要

目的

医学专业人士与社交媒体(SM)的互动越来越多。不同的 SM 平台以及不同的外科专业和地理位置之间的互动存在差异。我们旨在研究参加国际会议的结肠直肠外科医生的 SM 参与情况。

方法

从美国结直肠外科学会(ASCRS)和三方会议(华盛顿州西雅图,美国)2017 年年会的代表名单中确定外科医生。在 Twitter 和 LinkedIn 上搜索与代表名单相匹配的个人资料。分析 SM 的存在、活动、性别和地理位置。

结果

270 名(13.2%)外科医生拥有 Twitter 账户,994 名(44.3%)拥有 LinkedIn 个人资料。与其他地区的外科医生相比,英国外科医生更有可能使用 Twitter(23.4%比 12.7%,P=0.0072)。注意到每个地理位置之间的 SM 会员之间存在显著差异,Twitter 的使用率为 18.1%在欧洲,北美 14.4%,南美 12.9%,大洋洲 4.3%,亚洲 3.7%,非洲 0%。LinkedIn 也有类似的情况。#ASCRS17 会议是迄今为止用户参与度最高的会议(979 名参与者,超过 7000 条推文和近 1400 万次展示)。

结论

结肠直肠外科医生对 SM 的参与度继续增加。注意到显著的地理差异,这表明 SM 在教育和网络方面的独特潜力在全球范围内可能尚未得到广泛认可。未来的工作应包括进一步分析推文内容,以获得见解并优化 SM 作为教育辅助工具的使用。

相似文献

1
Social media engagement amongst 2017 colorectal surgery Tripartite Meeting attendees: updates on contemporary social media use.2017 年结直肠外科学会三方会议与会者的社交媒体参与度:当代社交媒体使用情况的最新动态。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 May;20(5):O114-O118. doi: 10.1111/codi.14058.
2
Contemporary engagement with social media amongst hernia surgery specialists.疝外科专家对社交媒体的当代参与情况。
Hernia. 2017 Aug;21(4):509-515. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1609-8. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
3
Contemporary use of social media by consultant colorectal surgeons.结直肠外科顾问医生对社交媒体的当代应用。
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;17(2):165-71. doi: 10.1111/codi.12780.
4
Social Media Use among United Kingdom Vascular Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study.英国血管外科医生的社交媒体使用情况:一项横断面研究。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 May;33:252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.10.028. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
5
Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013-2016.会议推文:2013 - 2016年美国乳腺外科医生学会年会上的推特使用情况
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3418-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5406-x. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
6
Tweeting the Headache Meetings: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Twitter Activity Surrounding American Headache Society Conferences. tweeted 头痛会议:围绕美国头痛学会会议的推特活动的横断面分析。
Headache. 2019 Apr;59(4):518-531. doi: 10.1111/head.13500. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
7
Social Media and Pediatric Scoliosis: An Analysis of Patient and Surgeon Use.社交媒体与小儿脊柱侧弯:患者及外科医生使用情况分析
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Oct 12;31:189-196.
8
Social media use in German visceral surgeons: a cross-sectional study of a national cohort.德国内脏外科医生对社交媒体的使用:一项全国队列的横断面研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Feb;20(2):144-149. doi: 10.1111/codi.13839.
9
The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings.社交媒体革命正在改变会议体验:来自八场国际会议的分析与趋势
BJU Int. 2015 May;115(5):839-46. doi: 10.1111/bju.12910. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
10
The use of social media in endourology: an analysis of the 2013 World Congress of Endourology meeting.社交媒体在腔内泌尿外科中的应用:2013年世界腔内泌尿外科大会会议分析
J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):615-20. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0329. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Current insights on social media as a tool for the dissemination of research and education in surgery: a narrative review.社交媒体作为外科领域研究和教育传播工具的最新见解:叙事性综述。
Surg Today. 2024 Oct;54(10):1113-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02891-1. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
2
Potential Role of Twitter at an Annual Congress in Japan - Narrative Literature Review of "Tweet the Meeting".推特在日本年度大会上的潜在作用——“会议推文”的叙事性文献综述
Circ Rep. 2019 Sep 19;1(10):401-404. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0046.
3
Social Media Engagement at Academic Conferences: Report of the Association of Pathology Chairs 2018 and 2019 Annual Meeting Social Media Committee.
学术会议中的社交媒体参与度:病理学主席协会2018年及2019年年会社交媒体委员会报告
Acad Pathol. 2020 Jul 17;7:2374289520934019. doi: 10.1177/2374289520934019. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
4
Teaching an old pain medicine society new tweets: integrating social media into continuing medical education.向一个老牌疼痛医学协会传授新的推文应用:将社交媒体融入继续医学教育
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Oct;72(5):409-412. doi: 10.4097/kja.19261. Epub 2019 Jul 1.