• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

tweeted 头痛会议:围绕美国头痛学会会议的推特活动的横断面分析。

Tweeting the Headache Meetings: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Twitter Activity Surrounding American Headache Society Conferences.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Montefiore Headache Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 2019 Apr;59(4):518-531. doi: 10.1111/head.13500. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1111/head.13500
PMID:30891749
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe and analyze Twitter activity associated with American Headache Society (AHS) conferences and evaluate the potential for Twitter to promote education and public outreach.

BACKGROUND

Many medical and scientific conferences have adopted Twitter as a method of promoting discussion among attendees as well as increasing visibility. Relatively little is known, however, about the composition of conference Twitter activity, the participants, and the impact on broader Twitter discussions.

METHODS

We analyzed Twitter data from 5 AHS conferences held from 2014 to 2016 using their respective hashtags. Using the Symplur Healthcare Hashtags open social media search platform, we gathered data on numbers of tweets, impressions, participants, and mentions during a 10-day period surrounding each conference, as well as samples of Twitter accounts participating. Prominent accounts were categorized as individual medical professionals, other individuals, host organizations, health-related organizations, medical centers, and industry by cross-checking their Twitter profiles and conference registration lists. Larger samples of accounts participating in the 2016 conferences were also obtained and categorized similarly, with individual person accounts classified by conference registration status. A related prominent hashtag (#migraine) was also identified and Twitter usage before, during, and after each conference was analyzed to evaluate the impact of conference activity on broader Twitter conversations.

RESULTS

Nineteen thousand nine hundred thirty-six tweets were generated across the 5 conferences, with 11,531 (58%) created by the Top 10 participating accounts in each conference, which were primarily individual medical professionals and host organizations. Thirty-two million six hundred eighty-three thousand impressions were generated across the 5 conferences, with 24,656,000 (75%) coming from the Top 10 participants in each, particularly host organizations and other individuals. An average of 331 accounts participated in each conference. The Top 10 mentioned accounts in each conference (consisting of 21 unique accounts with 14 accounts in the Top 10 across multiple conferences, primarily individual medical professionals) received a total of 15,093 mentions. Among 135 unique accounts participating actively in the two 2016 conferences, 39% were individual medical professionals, 38% other individuals, 16% health-related organizations (including the 2 host organizations), 4% medical centers, and 2% industry. From these samples, 34 of 70 (49%) and 43 of 66 (65%) individual person accounts participating in the Twitter discussion at each conference were not registered conference attendees, indicating substantial outside participation via Twitter. #migraine usage during conferences showed a significant increase from baseline in number of tweets (6080 in a 10-day period vs 3721, P < .0001) and participants (2332 vs 1830, P < .0001) but the increase was not significant for impressions (30,155 vs 25,361, P = .240).

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with the dynamics of Twitter conversations on other topics, AHS conference discussions featured a small group of accounts creating the bulk of content, with individual medical professionals and host organizations generating the largest shares of tweets and mentions while host organizations and other individuals produced the most impressions. Participating accounts were mainly individuals and health-related organizations, with more non-attendee participants than expected. Conference Twitter activity correlated with a significant increase in #migraine usage, suggesting a perceptible influence on the discussion of health-related topics beyond the conference itself.

摘要

目的

描述和分析与美国头痛学会 (AHS) 会议相关的 Twitter 活动,并评估 Twitter 在促进教育和公众外展方面的潜力。

背景

许多医学和科学会议已经采用 Twitter 作为促进与会者之间讨论以及提高知名度的一种方法。然而,人们对会议 Twitter 活动的组成部分、参与者以及对更广泛的 Twitter 讨论的影响了解甚少。

方法

我们使用各自的主题标签,使用 Symplur Healthcare Hashtags 开放社交媒体搜索平台,分析了 2014 年至 2016 年举行的 5 次 AHS 会议的 Twitter 数据。在会议前后的 10 天内,我们收集了关于推文数量、印象、参与者和提及次数的数据,以及参与会议的 Twitter 账户样本。通过交叉检查他们的 Twitter 个人资料和会议注册列表,确定了突出的账户,将其分为个人医疗专业人员、其他个人、主办组织、与健康相关的组织、医疗中心和行业。在 2016 年的会议上,还获得了更大的参与账户样本,并以类似的方式进行了分类,根据会议注册状态对个人账户进行了分类。还确定了一个相关的突出主题标签 (#migraine),并分析了会议前后的 Twitter 使用情况,以评估会议活动对更广泛的 Twitter 对话的影响。

结果

在 5 次会议中生成了 19936 条推文,其中 11531 条(58%)是每个会议中排名前 10 的参与账户创建的,这些账户主要是个人医疗专业人员和主办组织。在 5 次会议中产生了 3268.3 万次印象,其中 2465.6 万次(75%)来自每个会议中排名前 10 的参与者,尤其是主办组织和其他个人。平均每个会议有 331 个账户参与。每个会议中排名前 10 的提及账户(由 21 个唯一账户组成,其中 14 个账户在多个会议中排名前 10,主要是个人医疗专业人员)共收到了 15093 次提及。在积极参与 2016 年两次会议的 135 个独特账户中,39%是个人医疗专业人员,38%是其他个人,16%是与健康相关的组织(包括 2 个主办组织),4%是医疗中心,2%是行业。从这些样本中,70 个个人账户中有 34 个(49%)和 66 个个人账户中有 43 个(65%)在每个会议的 Twitter 讨论中未注册为会议与会者,表明通过 Twitter 进行了大量外部参与。会议期间 #migraine 的使用情况显示,在 10 天的时间内,推文数量(从 6080 条增加到 3721 条,P < 0.0001)和参与者数量(从 2332 人增加到 1830 人,P < 0.0001)显著增加,但印象数量的增加不显著(从 30155 条增加到 25361 条,P = 0.240)。

结论

与其他主题的 Twitter 对话动态一致,AHS 会议讨论的特点是一小部分账户创建了大部分内容,个人医疗专业人员和主办组织发布了最多的推文和提及,而主办组织和其他个人产生了最多的印象。参与的账户主要是个人和与健康相关的组织,非与会者参与者比预期的多。会议 Twitter 活动与 #migraine 使用的显著增加相关,这表明会议本身之外,对健康相关主题的讨论有明显的影响。

相似文献

1
Tweeting the Headache Meetings: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Twitter Activity Surrounding American Headache Society Conferences. tweeted 头痛会议:围绕美国头痛学会会议的推特活动的横断面分析。
Headache. 2019 Apr;59(4):518-531. doi: 10.1111/head.13500. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
2
The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings.社交媒体革命正在改变会议体验:来自八场国际会议的分析与趋势
BJU Int. 2015 May;115(5):839-46. doi: 10.1111/bju.12910. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
3
I Tweet, Therefore I Learn: An Analysis of Twitter Use Across Anesthesiology Conferences.我发推文,所以我学习:对麻醉学会议中 Twitter 使用情况的分析。
Anesth Analg. 2020 Feb;130(2):333-340. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004036.
4
Analysis of the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress Twitter Hashtags and Its Impact on Online Engagement and Attendance Rates : The Era of Health Care Social Media.美国外科医师学会临床大会 Twitter 话题分析及其对在线参与度和出席率的影响:医疗保健社交媒体时代。
Am Surg. 2021 Feb;87(2):235-241. doi: 10.1177/0003134820950289. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013-2016.会议推文:2013 - 2016年美国乳腺外科医生学会年会上的推特使用情况
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3418-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5406-x. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
6
Twitter in urology and other surgical specialties at global conferences.全球会议上泌尿外科及其他外科专业领域中的推特应用
ANZ J Surg. 2016 Apr;86(4):224-7. doi: 10.1111/ans.13393. Epub 2015 Dec 3.
7
Twitter use at a family medicine conference: analyzing #STFM13.家庭医学会议上的推特使用情况:分析#STFM13
Fam Med. 2014 Sep;46(8):608-14.
8
Twitter expands the reach and engagement of a national scientific meeting: the Irish Society of Urology.推特扩大了一场全国性科学会议——爱尔兰泌尿外科学会会议的影响力和参与度。
Ir J Med Sci. 2015 Sep;184(3):685-9. doi: 10.1007/s11845-015-1277-6. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
9
Twitter use at the 2016 Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health: analyzing #DIScience16.2016 年传播与实施健康科学会议上的 Twitter 使用情况:分析#DIScience16。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 20;13(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0723-z.
10
A social way to experience a scientific event: Twitter use at the 7th European Public Health Conference.一种体验科学活动的社交方式:第七届欧洲公共卫生会议上推特的使用情况
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Mar;44(2):130-3. doi: 10.1177/1403494815612932. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Analyzing public discourse of dementia from Spanish and English tweets: a comparative analysis with other neurological disorders.从西班牙语和英语推文中分析痴呆症的公众话语:与其他神经系统疾病的比较分析。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 24;15:1459578. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1459578. eCollection 2024.
2
Education Research: The Development and Utilization of a Virtual Twitter Onboarding Curriculum for Neurologists, Trainees, and Students: A Prospective Study.教育研究:针对神经科医生、实习生和学生的虚拟推特入职培训课程的开发与应用:一项前瞻性研究。
Neurol Educ. 2023 Jul 6;2(3):e200082. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200082. eCollection 2023 Sep 25.
3
Analysing the effectiveness of Twitter as an equitable community communication tool for international conferences.
分析 Twitter 作为国际会议公平社区交流工具的效果。
PeerJ. 2023 May 8;11:e15270. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15270. eCollection 2023.
4
Social Media Listening and Digital Profiling Study of People With Headache and Migraine: Retrospective Infodemiology Study.社交媒体聆听和头痛及偏头痛患者的数字画像研究:回顾性信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 5;25:e40461. doi: 10.2196/40461.
5
Promoting Research, Awareness, and Discussion on AI in Medicine Using #MedTwitterAI: A Longitudinal Twitter Hashtag Analysis.利用 #MedTwitterAI 促进医学人工智能领域的研究、意识和讨论:一项纵向 Twitter 话题分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 1;10:856571. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856571. eCollection 2022.
6
Be in the Digital Room Where it Happens, Part I: Tweeting & Technology for Career Development.置身于事件发生的数字空间,第一部分:推特与职业发展的技术手段
Child Neurol Open. 2022 Jun 20;9:2329048X221106843. doi: 10.1177/2329048X221106843. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
7
Use of Twitter in Neurology: Boon or Bane?推特在神经病学中的应用:是福还是祸?
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 14;23(5):e25229. doi: 10.2196/25229.
8
Social Media Engagement at Academic Conferences: Report of the Association of Pathology Chairs 2018 and 2019 Annual Meeting Social Media Committee.学术会议中的社交媒体参与度:病理学主席协会2018年及2019年年会社交媒体委员会报告
Acad Pathol. 2020 Jul 17;7:2374289520934019. doi: 10.1177/2374289520934019. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.