Kamenova Stefaniya, Mayer Rebecca, Rubbmark Oskar R, Coissac Eric, Plantegenest Manuel, Traugott Michael
Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, Villiers-en-Bois, France.
Agrocampus Ouest UMR1349 IGEPP, Rennes, France.
Mol Ecol Resour. 2018 Mar 6. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12775.
The rapidly growing field of molecular diet analysis is becoming increasingly popular among ecologists, especially when investigating methodologically challenging groups, such as invertebrate generalist predators. Prey DNA detection success is known to be affected by multiple factors; however, the type of dietary sample has rarely been considered. Here, we address this knowledge gap by comparing prey DNA detection success from three types of dietary samples. In a controlled feeding experiment, using the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius as a model predator, we collected regurgitates, faeces and whole consumers (including their gut contents) at different time points postfeeding. All dietary samples were analysed using multiplex PCR, targeting three different length DNA fragments (128, 332 and 612 bp). Our results show that both the type of dietary sample and the size of the DNA fragment contribute to a significant part of the variation found in the detectability of prey DNA. Specifically, we observed that in both regurgitates and whole consumers, prey DNA was detectable significantly longer for all fragment sizes than for faeces. Based on these observations, we conclude that prey DNA detected from regurgitates and whole consumers DNA extracts are comparable, whereas prey DNA detected from faeces, though still sufficiently reliable for ecological studies, will not be directly comparable to the former. Therefore, regurgitates and faeces constitute a useful, nonlethal source for dietary information that could be applied to field studies in situations when invertebrate predators should not be killed.
分子饮食分析这一快速发展的领域在生态学家中越来越受欢迎,尤其是在调查方法上具有挑战性的群体时,比如无脊椎动物广食性捕食者。已知猎物DNA检测成功率受多种因素影响;然而,饮食样本的类型很少被考虑。在这里,我们通过比较三种类型饮食样本中猎物DNA的检测成功率来填补这一知识空白。在一项对照饲养实验中,以步甲Pterostichus melanarius作为模式捕食者,我们在喂食后的不同时间点收集了反刍物、粪便和整个捕食者(包括其肠道内容物)。所有饮食样本都使用多重PCR进行分析,针对三个不同长度的DNA片段(128、332和612 bp)。我们的结果表明,饮食样本的类型和DNA片段的大小在猎物DNA可检测性的变异中占了很大一部分。具体来说,我们观察到,在反刍物和整个捕食者中,所有片段大小的猎物DNA可检测的时间都明显长于粪便中的。基于这些观察结果,我们得出结论,从反刍物和整个捕食者DNA提取物中检测到的猎物DNA具有可比性,而从粪便中检测到的猎物DNA,虽然对于生态研究来说仍然足够可靠,但将无法与前者直接比较。因此,反刍物和粪便构成了有用的、非致命的饮食信息来源,可应用于不应杀死无脊椎动物捕食者的实地研究。