Suppr超能文献

评估含2.9%过氧化氢的非处方牙齿美白剂安全性和有效性的双盲随机研究。

Double-blind Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Over-the-counter Tooth-whitening Agents Containing 2.9% Hydrogen Peroxide.

作者信息

Kim Y M, Ha A N, Kim J W, Kim S J

出版信息

Oper Dent. 2018 May/Jun;43(3):272-281. doi: 10.2341/16-379-C. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this double-blind randomized study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of over-the-counter (OTC) bleaching products that included 2.9% hydrogen peroxide (HO) with two methods of application: strip and paint-on.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A commonly used product was selected for each type (strip and paint-on) of OTC bleaching agent. In total, 75 volunteers were assigned randomly into five groups: two test groups (strip and paint-on), two negative control groups (products without HO), and one positive control group (dentist-supervised home bleaching). The tooth shade was evaluated with a spectrophotometer and Vita shade guide at baseline and 2 weeks and 4 weeks after use. To document any adverse reactions, such as hypersensitivity or tissue irritation, all patients were examined and the Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), and a visual analog scale (VAS) measuring the cold response were obtained.

RESULTS

There were significant differences among the five groups ( p<0.001). The positive control showed the greatest color changes; then, in decreasing order, the strip-type test group, paint-on-type test group, and negative controls. The strip-type bleaching agent was significantly more effective than the paint-on-type agent and the negative control, while it was significantly less effective than the dentist-supervised home bleaching. Regardless of the treatment group, the canines showed greater color changes than did the central or lateral incisors. Some cases of gingival irritation and hypersensitivity were observed, but they were mild and reversible. GI, PI, and VAS scores were not significantly changed.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, the results indicated that the strip-type and paint-on-type OTC bleaching agents were significantly less efficacious than was dentist-supervised home bleaching; however, they showed acceptable safety and efficacy. The strip-type was more effective than was the paint-on-type in this study.

摘要

目的

在这项双盲随机研究中,我们评估了含有2.9%过氧化氢(HO)的非处方(OTC)漂白产品采用两种应用方法(牙贴和涂抹式)的安全性和有效性。

方法和材料

为每种类型(牙贴和涂抹式)的OTC漂白剂选择一种常用产品。总共75名志愿者被随机分为五组:两个试验组(牙贴和涂抹式)、两个阴性对照组(不含HO的产品)和一个阳性对照组(牙医指导的家庭漂白)。在基线以及使用后2周和4周,用分光光度计和Vita比色板评估牙齿颜色。为记录任何不良反应,如过敏或组织刺激,对所有患者进行检查,并获得牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)以及测量冷反应的视觉模拟量表(VAS)。

结果

五组之间存在显著差异(p<0.001)。阳性对照组显示出最大的颜色变化;然后,按降序排列,依次为牙贴型试验组、涂抹型试验组和阴性对照组。牙贴型漂白剂比涂抹型漂白剂和阴性对照组显著更有效,但比牙医指导的家庭漂白显著效果更差。无论治疗组如何,尖牙的颜色变化都比中切牙或侧切牙更大。观察到一些牙龈刺激和过敏病例,但都很轻微且可逆。GI、PI和VAS评分没有显著变化。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,结果表明牙贴型和涂抹型OTC漂白剂的效果明显不如牙医指导的家庭漂白;然而,它们显示出可接受的安全性和有效性。在本研究中,牙贴型比涂抹型更有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验