School of Dentistry, University Center-UNIFAE, São João da Boa Vista, SP, Brazil.
Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 2;28(3):189. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05595-5.
To assess color change efficacy and the adverse effects of varied over-the-counter (OTC) bleaching protocols.
The study included randomized clinical trials evaluating color changes from OTC bleaching agents. Nine databases were searched, including the partial capture of the grey literature. The RoB2 tool analyzed the individual risk of bias in the studies. Frequentist network meta-analyses compared treatments through common comparators (∆Eab* and ∆SGU color changes, and tooth sensitivity), integrating direct and indirect estimates and using the mean and risk differences as effect measures with respective 95% confidence intervals. The GRADE approach assessed the certainty of the evidence.
Overall, 37 remaining studies constituted the qualitative analysis, and ten composed the meta-analyses. The total sample included 1,932 individuals. ∆Eab* was significantly higher in groups 6% hydrogen peroxide (HP) strips (≥ 14 h). ∆SGU was significantly higher in groups at-home 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) (≥ 14 h), followed by 6% HP strips (≥ 14 h) and 3% HP strips (≥ 14 h). At-home 10% CP (7-13 h) and placebo showed lower risks of tooth sensitivity without significant differences between these treatments.
Considering the low level of evidence, OTC products presented satisfactory short-term effects on tooth bleaching compared to the placebo, with little to no impact on dentin hypersensitivity and gingival irritation.
OTC products are proving to be practical alternatives for tooth whitening. However, patients should be advised about the possible risks of carrying out such procedures without professional supervision.
评估不同非处方(OTC)漂白方案的颜色变化效果和不良反应。
本研究纳入了评估 OTC 漂白剂引起的颜色变化的随机临床试验。共检索了 9 个数据库,包括对灰色文献的部分捕获。RoB2 工具分析了研究中个体偏倚的风险。频率论网络荟萃分析通过常见对照(∆Eab*和 ∆SGU 颜色变化以及牙齿敏感性)比较治疗方法,整合直接和间接估计值,并使用均值和风险差异作为效应量,分别具有各自的 95%置信区间。GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。
总体而言,37 项剩余研究构成了定性分析,10 项研究进行了荟萃分析。总样本包括 1932 人。6%双氧水(HP)条组(≥14 小时)的 ∆Eab*显著更高。家庭用 10%过氧化脲(CP)(≥14 小时)组的 ∆SGU 显著更高,其次是 6%HP 条组(≥14 小时)和 3%HP 条组(≥14 小时)。家庭用 10%CP(7-13 小时)和安慰剂组的牙齿敏感性风险较低,这些治疗方法之间没有显著差异。
考虑到证据水平较低,与安慰剂相比,OTC 产品在牙齿漂白方面具有令人满意的短期效果,对牙本质敏感和牙龈刺激的影响很小或没有。
OTC 产品已被证明是牙齿美白的实用替代方法。然而,应告知患者在没有专业监督的情况下进行这些程序的可能风险。