Department of Electrical, Electronic and Information Engineering (DEI), University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193004. eCollection 2018.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and neurofeedback-guided motor imagery (MI) have attracted considerable interest in neurorehabilitation, given their ability to influence neuroplasticity. As tDCS has been shown to modulate event-related desynchronization (ERD), the neural signature of motor imagery detected for neurofeedback, a combination of the techniques was recently proposed. One limitation of this approach is that the area targeted for stimulation is the same from which the signal for neurofeedback is acquired. As tDCS may interfere with proximal electroencephalographic (EEG) electrodes, in this study our aim was to test whether contralateral tDCS could have interhemispheric effects on the spectral power of the unstimulated hemisphere, possibly mediated by transcallosal connection, and whether such effects could be used to enhance ERD magnitudes. A contralateral stimulation approach would indeed facilitate co-registration, as the stimulation electrode would be far from the recording sites.
Twenty right-handed healthy volunteers (aged 21 to 32) participated in the study: ten assigned to cathodal, ten to anodal versus sham stimulation. We applied stimulation over the dominant (left) hemisphere, and assessed ERD and spectral power over the non-dominant (right) hemisphere. The effect of tDCS was evaluated over time. Spectral power was assessed in theta, alpha and beta bands, under both rest and MI conditions, while ERD was evaluated in alpha and beta bands.
Two main findings emerged: (1) contralateral alpha-ERD was reduced after anodal (p = 0.0147), but not enhanced after cathodal tDCS; (2) both stimulations had remote effects on the spectral power of the contralateral hemisphere, particularly in theta and alpha (significant differences in the topographical t-value maps).
The absence of contralateral cathodal ERD enhancement suggests that the protocol is not applicable in the context of MI training. Nevertheless, ERD results of anodal and spectral power results of both stimulations complement recent findings on the distant tDCS effects between functionally related areas.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和神经反馈引导的运动想象(MI)因其能够影响神经可塑性,而在神经康复中引起了极大的关注。由于 tDCS 已被证明可以调节事件相关去同步化(ERD),即神经反馈检测到的运动想象的神经特征,因此最近提出了这两种技术的组合。该方法的一个限制是,刺激的目标区域与用于神经反馈的信号采集区域相同。由于 tDCS 可能会干扰近侧脑电图(EEG)电极,因此在这项研究中,我们的目的是测试对侧 tDCS 是否可以通过胼胝体连接对未刺激半球的频谱功率产生半球间效应,并且这种效应是否可以用于增强 ERD 幅度。对侧刺激方法确实可以促进共定位,因为刺激电极将远离记录部位。
20 名右利手健康志愿者(年龄 21 至 32 岁)参加了这项研究:10 名志愿者接受阴极、阳极或假刺激。我们在优势(左)半球上施加刺激,并评估非优势(右)半球的 ERD 和频谱功率。评估了 tDCS 的时间效应。在休息和 MI 两种情况下,评估了θ、α和β频段的频谱功率,以及α和β频段的 ERD。
主要有两个发现:(1)阳极刺激后,对侧α-ERD 减少(p = 0.0147),但阴极 tDCS 后未增强;(2)两种刺激都对对侧半球的频谱功率产生了远程影响,特别是在θ和α频段(在拓扑 t 值图中有显著差异)。
对侧阴极 ERD 增强的缺失表明该方案在 MI 训练中不适用。然而,阳极刺激的 ERD 结果和两种刺激的频谱功率结果补充了最近关于功能相关区域之间的远距离 tDCS 效应的发现。