Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Department of Comparative Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193217. eCollection 2018.
Antibiotic resistance of bacteria common to the ocular surface is an evolving problem. Thus, novel treatment options with new modes of action are required. We investigated the antibacterial activity and safety of three commercially available topical veterinary ophthalmic products (cationic steroid antibiotics, products A and B, and a neutral superoxidized water, product C) to determine their potential use as antimicrobial alternatives. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of the three products were determined against 17 antibiotic resistant bacterial clinical isolates from the ocular surface. Using a standard cytotoxicity assay, the products at varying concentrations were evaluated with a corneal fibroblast cell line and a macrophage-like cell line to determine their potential toxic effect in vitro. The commercial ophthalmic solutions, ofloxacin 0.3%, tobramycin 0.3% and gentamicin 0.3% were used as positive controls for the MIC and tobramycin 0.3% was used as positive control for the cytotoxicity assays. For the MIC, Product C showed no inhibition of growth for any organisms, while Products A and B showed inhibition of growth similar to slightly less than the positive controls. For the cytotoxicity assays, Product C exhibited minimal toxicity while Products A and B exhibited toxicity similar to the controls. In conclusion, Product C had no antibacterial activity in these assays, while Products A and B had antibacterial profiles similar to slightly less than common topical ophthalmic antibiotics and cytotoxicity profiles similar to common topical ophthalmic antibiotics. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the antibacterial activity and safety of the cationic steroid antibiotics and superoxidized water.
眼部常见细菌的抗生素耐药性是一个不断发展的问题。因此,需要新的作用模式的治疗选择。我们研究了三种市售的兽医眼科局部用产品(阳离子皮质类固醇抗生素,产品 A 和 B,以及中性超氧化水,产品 C)的抗菌活性和安全性,以确定它们作为抗菌替代品的潜在用途。测定了三种产品对 17 种来自眼部表面的抗生素耐药临床分离菌的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)。使用标准细胞毒性测定法,用角膜成纤维细胞系和巨噬细胞样细胞系评估产品在不同浓度下的潜在体外毒性。将市售的眼科溶液氧氟沙星 0.3%、妥布霉素 0.3%和庆大霉素 0.3%用作 MIC 的阳性对照,并用妥布霉素 0.3%作为细胞毒性测定的阳性对照。对于 MIC,产品 C 对任何生物体都没有抑制生长作用,而产品 A 和 B 显示出与阳性对照相似的抑制生长作用,但略低。对于细胞毒性测定,产品 C 表现出最小的毒性,而产品 A 和 B 表现出与对照相似的毒性。总之,产品 C 在这些测定中没有抗菌活性,而产品 A 和 B 的抗菌谱与常见的局部眼科抗生素相似,但略低,细胞毒性谱与常见的局部眼科抗生素相似。据我们所知,这是首次报道阳离子皮质类固醇抗生素和超氧化水的抗菌活性和安全性。