• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置治疗中患者生活质量和照顾者负担的患者和照顾者决定因素。

Patient and Caregiver Determinants of Patient Quality of Life and Caregiver Strain in Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.

机构信息

Oregon Health and Science University School of Nursing, Portland, OR

Oregon Health and Science University School of Nursing, Portland, OR.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 7;7(6):e008080. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008080.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.117.008080
PMID:29514804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5907562/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although current guidelines emphasize the importance of social support to the success of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, few studies examine the influence of the caregiver on patient outcomes or quantify the impact of LVAD caregiving on caregiver outcomes. The purpose of this analysis was to identify patient and caregiver determinants of patient quality of life (QOL) and caregiver strain in response to LVAD therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data on patients receiving LVAD therapy and their caregivers (n=50 dyads) were prospectively collected pre-implantation and 1, 3, and 6 months post-implantation. Growth curve modeling was used to describe change in patient QOL (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) and caregiver strain (Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index). Patient QOL improved most in the first month (β=23.22±3.76, <0.001), followed by gradual gains over 6 months (β=1.90±0.64, <0.01). Caregivers experienced worsening of strain in the first month (β=4.30±1.42, <0.01), followed by gradual resolution to pre-implantation levels by 6 months (β=-0.71±0.23, <0.01). Worse pre-implantation patient symptoms were associated with greater improvement in patient QOL (β=0.53±0.19, <0.01) but worsening caregiver strain (β=0.15±0.07, =0.04). Better relationship quality was associated with greater improvement in patient QOL (β=14.39±5.85, =0.01) and less pre-implantation caregiver strain (β=-9.31±2.28, <0.001). Nonspousal caregivers experienced less pre-implantation strain (β=-8.60±3.10, =0.01), and patients with nonspousal caregivers had less improvement in QOL (β=-3.70±1.62, =0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of patient and caregiver characteristics predicts patient and caregiver response to LVAD therapy. Including caregiver factors in future studies may be helpful in developing interventions that improve patient and caregiver outcomes, together.

摘要

背景

尽管目前的指南强调了社会支持对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)治疗成功的重要性,但很少有研究探讨照顾者对患者结局的影响,或量化 LVAD 护理对照顾者结局的影响。本分析的目的是确定患者和照顾者决定因素,以响应 LVAD 治疗的患者生活质量(QOL)和照顾者压力。

方法和结果

前瞻性收集了接受 LVAD 治疗的患者及其照顾者(n=50 对)的数据,分别在植入前、植入后 1、3 和 6 个月收集。使用增长曲线模型描述患者 QOL(堪萨斯城心肌病问卷)和照顾者压力(多维照顾者压力指数)的变化。患者 QOL 在第一个月改善最多(β=23.22±3.76,<0.001),然后在 6 个月内逐渐增加(β=1.90±0.64,<0.01)。照顾者在第一个月经历了压力的恶化(β=4.30±1.42,<0.01),然后在 6 个月内逐渐恢复到植入前的水平(β=-0.71±0.23,<0.01)。植入前患者症状越严重,患者 QOL 的改善越大(β=0.53±0.19,<0.01),但照顾者压力恶化越大(β=0.15±0.07,=0.04)。更好的关系质量与患者 QOL 的更大改善(β=14.39±5.85,=0.01)和植入前照顾者压力的减少(β=-9.31±2.28,<0.001)相关。非配偶照顾者在植入前的压力较小(β=-8.60±3.10,=0.01),而非配偶照顾者的患者 QOL 改善较少(β=-3.70±1.62,=0.02)。

结论

患者和照顾者的特征组合预测了患者和照顾者对 LVAD 治疗的反应。在未来的研究中纳入照顾者因素可能有助于共同改善患者和照顾者的结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f1e/5907562/1e4c22ca4e82/JAH3-7-e008080-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f1e/5907562/a9aa4ad070b2/JAH3-7-e008080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f1e/5907562/a414a86f4196/JAH3-7-e008080-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f1e/5907562/1e4c22ca4e82/JAH3-7-e008080-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f1e/5907562/a9aa4ad070b2/JAH3-7-e008080-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f1e/5907562/a414a86f4196/JAH3-7-e008080-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f1e/5907562/1e4c22ca4e82/JAH3-7-e008080-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and Caregiver Determinants of Patient Quality of Life and Caregiver Strain in Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.左心室辅助装置治疗中患者生活质量和照顾者负担的患者和照顾者决定因素。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 7;7(6):e008080. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008080.
2
Perceived Stress and Depressive Symptoms as Predictors of Decisional Conflict in Dyads Considering a Left Ventricular Assist Device.将左心室辅助装置作为考虑因素时,感知压力和抑郁症状作为二元组决策冲突的预测因素。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Mar;13(3):e006155. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006155. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
3
Association of Patient Reported Outcomes With Caregiver Burden in Older Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: Insights From the SUSTAIN-IT Study.老年心力衰竭患者患者报告结局与照料者负担的相关性:来自 SUSTAIN-IT 研究的见解。
Circ Heart Fail. 2024 Jul;17(7):e011705. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.124.011705. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
4
Caregiver Health-Related Quality of Life, Burden, and Patient Outcomes in Ambulatory Advanced Heart Failure: A Report From REVIVAL.门诊晚期心力衰竭患者的照护者健康相关生活质量、负担和患者结局:REVIVAL 研究报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e019901. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019901. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
5
Caregivers of Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Possible Impacts on Patients' Mortality and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support-Defined Morbidity Events.左心室辅助装置患者的护理人员:对患者死亡率及机械辅助循环支持定义的机构间注册处发病率事件的可能影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002879.
6
Quality of Life, Depression, and Anxiety in Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Longitudinal Outcomes for Patients and Family Caregivers.心室辅助装置治疗中的生活质量、抑郁和焦虑:患者及家庭照顾者的纵向结局
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Sep-Oct;32(5):455-463. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000378.
7
Stress and Coping Among Family Caregivers of Patients With a Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Multicenter Mixed Methods Study.患者使用目的地治疗左心室辅助装置的家庭护理人员的压力和应对方式:一项多中心混合方法研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;14(10):e008243. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008243. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
8
Does a Comprehensive Inpatient Rehabilitation Program Improve Patients' and Caregivers' Emotional State in LVAD Patients?全面的住院康复计划能否改善左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者及其照顾者的情绪状态?
Artif Organs. 2019 Mar;43(3):229-233. doi: 10.1111/aor.13351. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
9
Decisional regret in left ventricular assist device patient-caregiver dyads.左心室辅助装置患者-照护者对决策的遗憾。
Heart Lung. 2019 Sep-Oct;48(5):400-404. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.05.003.
10
Association Between Caregiver Burden and Patient Recovery After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Insights From Sustaining Quality of Life of the Aged: Heart Transplant or Mechanical Support.左心室辅助装置植入后照顾者负担与患者康复的关系:来自维持老年患者生活质量:心脏移植或机械支持的研究结果。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023;38(3):237-246. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000972. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease and Their Care Partners: An Analysis of Care Needs, Care Activities, and Care Partner Stress and Mental Health.患有心血管疾病的老年人及其护理伙伴:护理需求、护理活动、护理伙伴压力与心理健康分析
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000001210.
2
Caregivers of patients with long-term implantable ventricular assist device: a republication of the article published in the Japanese Journal of Artificial Organs.长期植入式心室辅助装置患者的照料者:在日本人工器官杂志上发表的文章再版。
J Artif Organs. 2024 Sep;27(3):193-197. doi: 10.1007/s10047-024-01445-z. Epub 2024 May 23.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Eighth annual INTERMACS report: Special focus on framing the impact of adverse events.第八年度 INTERMACS 报告:特别关注不良事件影响的构建。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Oct;36(10):1080-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
2
Patterns, relevance and predictors of heart failure dyadic symptom appraisal.心力衰竭二元症状评估的模式、相关性及预测因素
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Oct;16(7):595-604. doi: 10.1177/1474515117700760. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
3
Caregivers of Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Possible Impacts on Patients' Mortality and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support-Defined Morbidity Events.
Change in Caregiver Health-Related Quality of Life From Before to Early After Surgery: SUSTAIN-IT Study.
手术前后照料者健康相关生活质量的变化:SUSTAIN-IT 研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;16(8):e010038. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.010038. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
4
"The heart in a bag": The lived experience of patient-caregiver dyads with left ventricular assist device during cardiac rehabilitation.“袋中之心”:心脏康复期间左心室辅助装置患者-照顾者二元组的生活体验
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 10;14:1116739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1116739. eCollection 2023.
5
Person with Heart Failure and Care Partner Dyads: Current Knowledge, Challenges, and Future Directions: State-of-the-Art Review.心力衰竭患者及其照护伙伴对现状的认识、挑战和未来方向:综述
J Card Fail. 2023 Aug;29(8):1187-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.02.017. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
6
Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Patients With Heart Failure From Before to Early After Advanced Surgical Therapies: Findings From the SUSTAIN-IT Study.老年心力衰竭患者接受高级外科治疗前后的健康相关生活质量:来自 SUSTAIN-IT 研究的结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;15(10):e009579. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.009579. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
7
The Impact of Cardiac Devices on Patients' Quality of Life-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心脏装置对患者生活质量的影响——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Aug 10;9(8):257. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9080257.
8
Baseline Quality-of-Life of Caregivers of Patients With Heart Failure Prior to Advanced Therapies: Findings From the Sustaining Quality of Life of the Aged: Transplant or Mechanical Support (SUSTAIN-IT) Study.心力衰竭患者接受先进治疗前的照顾者基线生活质量:来自维持老年患者生活质量:移植或机械支持(SUSTAIN-IT)研究的结果。
J Card Fail. 2022 Jul;28(7):1137-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.03.358. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
Psychological difficulties of LVAD patients and caregivers: A follow up over one year from discharge.LVAD 患者及其照顾者的心理困难:出院后一年的随访。
Artif Organs. 2022 Mar;46(3):479-490. doi: 10.1111/aor.14071. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
Stress and Coping Among Family Caregivers of Patients With a Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Multicenter Mixed Methods Study.患者使用目的地治疗左心室辅助装置的家庭护理人员的压力和应对方式:一项多中心混合方法研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;14(10):e008243. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008243. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
左心室辅助装置患者的护理人员:对患者死亡率及机械辅助循环支持定义的机构间注册处发病率事件的可能影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002879.
4
Quality of Life, Depression, and Anxiety in Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Longitudinal Outcomes for Patients and Family Caregivers.心室辅助装置治疗中的生活质量、抑郁和焦虑:患者及家庭照顾者的纵向结局
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Sep-Oct;32(5):455-463. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000378.
5
Knowledge Gaps in Cardiovascular Care of Older Adults: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society: Executive Summary.老年人心血管护理中的知识差距:美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会和美国老年医学会的科学声明:执行摘要
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2185-2192. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14576. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
Caregiver Well-being and Patient Outcomes in Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis.心力衰竭中照顾者的幸福感与患者预后:一项荟萃分析。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;32(4):372-382. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000350.
7
A scoping review of caregiver burden during allogeneic HSCT: lessons learned and future directions.异基因造血干细胞移植期间照顾者负担的范围综述:经验教训与未来方向
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Nov;51(11):1416-1422. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.164. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
8
Burdensome Physical and Depressive Symptoms Predict Heart Failure-Specific Health Status Over One Year.繁重的身体症状和抑郁症状可预测一年以上的心力衰竭特异性健康状况。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):963-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.328. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
9
Psychometric Analysis of the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale as a Measure of Patient Symptom Perception.心力衰竭躯体感知量表作为患者症状感知测量工具的心理测量分析
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Mar/Apr;32(2):140-147. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000320.
10
Determinants of Heart Failure Self-Care Maintenance and Management in Patients and Caregivers: A Dyadic Analysis.患者及照护者心力衰竭自我护理维持与管理的决定因素:二元分析
Res Nurs Health. 2015 Oct;38(5):392-402. doi: 10.1002/nur.21675. Epub 2015 Aug 20.