• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人心血管护理中的知识差距:美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会和美国老年医学会的科学声明:执行摘要

Knowledge Gaps in Cardiovascular Care of Older Adults: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society: Executive Summary.

作者信息

Rich Michael W, Chyun Deborah A, Skolnick Adam H, Alexander Karen P, Forman Daniel E, Kitzman Dalane W, Maurer Mathew S, McClurken James B, Resnick Barbara M, Shen Win K, Tirschwell David L

机构信息

School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.

College of Nursing, New York University, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2185-2192. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14576. Epub 2016 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.14576
PMID:27673575
Abstract

The incidence and prevalence of most cardiovascular disorders increase with age, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and major disability in adults aged 75 and older. Despite the effect of CVD on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality in older adults, individuals aged 75 and older have been markedly underrepresented in most major cardiovascular trials, and virtually all trials have excluded older adults with complex comorbidities, significant physical or cognitive disabilities, frailty, or residence in nursing homes and assisted living facilities. As a result, current guidelines are unable to provide evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of older adults typical of those encountered in routine clinical practice. The objectives of this scientific statement are to summarize current guideline recommendations as they apply to older adults, identify critical gaps in knowledge that preclude informed evidence-based decision-making, and recommend future research to close existing knowledge gaps. To achieve these objectives, a detailed review was conducted of current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and American Stroke Association (ASA) guidelines to identify content and recommendations that explicitly targeted older adults. A pervasive lack of evidence to guide clinical decision-making in older adults with CVD was found, as well as a paucity of data on the effect of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions on outcomes that are particularly important to older adults, such as quality of life, physical function, and maintenance of independence. Accordingly, there is a critical need for a multitude of large population-based studies and clinical trials that include a broad spectrum of older adults representative of those seen in clinical practice and that incorporate relevant outcomes important to older adults in the study design. The results of these studies will provide the foundation for future evidence-based guidelines applicable to older adults and enhance person-centered care of older individuals with CVD in the United States and around the world.

摘要

大多数心血管疾病的发病率和患病率随年龄增长而增加,心血管疾病(CVD)是75岁及以上成年人死亡和重度残疾的主要原因。尽管心血管疾病对老年人的生活质量、发病率和死亡率有影响,但在大多数主要的心血管试验中,75岁及以上的个体所占比例明显过低,而且几乎所有试验都排除了患有复杂合并症、有明显身体或认知残疾、身体虚弱或居住在疗养院和辅助生活设施中的老年人。因此,目前的指南无法为常规临床实践中常见的老年患者的诊断和治疗提供循证建议。本科学声明的目的是总结当前适用于老年人的指南建议,识别妨碍做出明智的循证决策的关键知识空白,并推荐未来的研究以填补现有的知识空白。为实现这些目标,对美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)和美国中风协会(ASA)的现行指南进行了详细审查,以确定明确针对老年人的内容和建议。结果发现,在指导患有心血管疾病的老年人进行临床决策方面普遍缺乏证据,而且关于诊断和治疗干预对老年人尤为重要的结局(如生活质量、身体功能和保持独立)的影响的数据也很少。因此,迫切需要开展大量基于人群的研究和临床试验,纳入广泛的、代表临床实践中所见老年人的样本,并在研究设计中纳入对老年人重要的相关结局。这些研究结果将为未来适用于老年人的循证指南奠定基础,并在美国乃至全球加强对患有心血管疾病的老年人的以患者为中心的护理。

相似文献

1
Knowledge Gaps in Cardiovascular Care of Older Adults: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society: Executive Summary.老年人心血管护理中的知识差距:美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会和美国老年医学会的科学声明:执行摘要
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2185-2192. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14576. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
2
Knowledge Gaps in Cardiovascular Care of the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society.老年人群心血管护理中的知识空白:美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会和美国老年医学会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2016 May 24;133(21):2103-22. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000380. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
3
Knowledge Gaps in Cardiovascular Care of the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and American Geriatrics Society.老年人群心血管护理中的知识空白:美国心脏协会、美国心脏病学会和美国老年医学会的科学声明。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 24;67(20):2419-2440. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
4
Pharmacotherapy in Older Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: Report from an American College of Cardiology, American Geriatrics Society, and National Institute on Aging Workshop.老年心血管疾病患者的药物治疗:美国心脏病学会、美国老年医学学会和美国国家老龄化研究所联合研讨会报告。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Feb;67(2):371-380. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15634. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
5
Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.老年人急性冠脉护理,第一部分:非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征:美国心脏协会临床心脏病学委员会为医疗专业人员发布的科学声明:与老年心脏病学会合作制定
Circulation. 2007 May 15;115(19):2549-69. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182615.
6
Acute coronary care in the elderly, part II: ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: in collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology.老年人急性冠脉护理,第二部分:ST段抬高型心肌梗死:美国心脏协会临床心脏病学理事会为医疗专业人员发表的科学声明:与老年心脏病学会合作制定
Circulation. 2007 May 15;115(19):2570-89. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.182616.
7
ACCF/AHA methodology for the development of quality measures for cardiovascular technology: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心血管技术质量指标制定方法学:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会绩效指标工作组的报告。
Circulation. 2011 Sep 27;124(13):1483-502. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31822935fc. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
8
Comparison of application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, and European Society of Cardiology guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in a European cohort.比较 ACC/AHA 指南、成人治疗专家组 III 指南和欧洲心脏病学会指南在欧洲队列中用于心血管疾病预防的应用。
JAMA. 2014 Apr 9;311(14):1416-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2632.
9
ACCF/AHA clinical practice guideline methodology summit report: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告:ACCF/AHA临床实践指南方法学峰会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 15;61(2):213-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.025. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
10
ACCF/AHA methodology for the development of quality measures for cardiovascular technology: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心血管技术质量指标制定方法学:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会绩效指标工作组的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 27;58(14):1517-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Global, regional, and national epidemiology of ischemic heart disease among individuals aged 55 and above from 1990 to 2021: a cross-sectional study.1990年至2021年55岁及以上人群缺血性心脏病的全球、区域和国家流行病学:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 12;25(1):985. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22193-6.
2
Age-Related Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: In Which Subgroups Does Age Matter? Results from a Large-Scale Retrospective Registry.接受冠状动脉造影术患者的年龄相关结局:年龄在哪些亚组中具有重要意义?一项大规模回顾性登记研究的结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 31;14(3):928. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030928.
3
Pathway analysis of the impact of health literacy, social support, and self-management on frailty in patients with chronic heart failure: A cross-sectional study.
健康素养、社会支持和自我管理对慢性心力衰竭患者衰弱影响的途径分析:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 25;103(43):e40195. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040195.
4
Music to relieve pain and anxiety in cardiac catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.音乐缓解心脏导管插入术中疼痛和焦虑的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 28;10(13):e33815. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33815. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
5
Evolution of REperfusion Strategies and impact on mortality in Old and Very OLD STEMI patients. The RESOVOLD-e-MUST study.老年和非常老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者再灌注策略的演变及其对死亡率的影响。RESOVOLD-e-MUST 研究。
Age Ageing. 2024 Jan 2;53(1). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad215.
6
Frailty syndrome and associated factors among patients with hypertension: A cross-sectional study in Kumasi, Ghana.高血压患者的衰弱综合征及相关因素:加纳库马西的一项横断面研究
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 25;6(10):e1664. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1664. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Geriatric Cardiology: Coming of Age.老年心脏病学:走向成熟。
JACC Adv. 2022 Aug;1(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100070. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
8
Optimal anti-platelet therapy for older patients with acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials comprising 59,284 older patients.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者的最佳抗血小板治疗:包含 59284 例老年患者的随机试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Jan;57(1):143-154. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02875-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
9
Five-Year Prognostic Value of DAPT Score in Older Patients undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Large-Sample Study in the Real World.DAPT 评分在老年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的 5 年预后价值:真实世界大样本研究。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Aug 1;30(8):1057-1069. doi: 10.5551/jat.64212. Epub 2023 May 30.
10
Trends in post-acute care and outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure between 2008 and 2015.2008 年至 2015 年期间,因心力衰竭住院的 Medicare 受益人的急性后期护理和结局趋势。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Mar;71(3):730-741. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18109. Epub 2022 Nov 1.