• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Temperature and competition interact to structure Himalayan bird communities.温度和竞争相互作用,塑造了喜马拉雅地区的鸟类群落。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 14;285(1874). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2593.
2
The role of competition, ecotones, and temperature in the elevational distribution of Himalayan birds.喜马拉雅鸟类海拔分布中竞争、生态交错带和温度的作用。
Ecology. 2017 Feb;98(2):337-348. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1669.
3
Ecological Limits as the Driver of Bird Species Richness Patterns along the East Himalayan Elevational Gradient.沿东喜马拉雅海拔梯度的鸟类物种丰富度模式的生态限制驱动因素。
Am Nat. 2020 May;195(5):802-817. doi: 10.1086/707665. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
A test for community saturation along the Himalayan bird diversity gradient, based on within-species geographical variation.基于物种内地理变异的喜马拉雅鸟类多样性梯度上的群落饱和度测试。
J Anim Ecol. 2014 May;83(3):628-38. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12157. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
5
Seasonal Changes in Bird Species and Feeding Guilds along Elevational Gradients of the Central Himalayas, Nepal.尼泊尔中部喜马拉雅山脉海拔梯度上鸟类物种和取食类群的季节性变化
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 1;11(7):e0158362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158362. eCollection 2016.
6
Interspecific competition shapes bird species' distributions along tropical precipitation gradients.种间竞争塑造了热带降水梯度上鸟类物种的分布。
Ecol Lett. 2024 Aug;27(8):e14487. doi: 10.1111/ele.14487.
7
Functional and phylogenetic structure of island bird communities.岛屿鸟类群落的功能和系统发育结构。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 May;86(3):532-542. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12650. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
Climate change in our backyards: the reshuffling of North America's winter bird communities.后院的气候变化:北美冬季鸟类群落的重新组合。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Feb;21(2):572-85. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12740. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
9
The pace of past climate change vs. potential bird distributions and land use in the United States.过去气候变化的速度与美国潜在鸟类分布和土地利用的关系。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Mar;22(3):1130-44. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13154. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
10
The importance of agricultural lands for Himalayan birds in winter.农业用地对喜马拉雅山脉鸟类冬季生存的重要性。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):416-426. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12812. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Using a large citizen science dataset to uncover diverse patterns of elevational migration in Himalayan birds.利用一个大型公民科学数据集揭示喜马拉雅鸟类海拔迁移的多样模式。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 7;12(5):242260. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242260. eCollection 2025.
2
Investigating avian competition for surface water in an arid zone bioregion.研究干旱地区生物区域内鸟类对地表水的竞争。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Aug 3;13(8):e10396. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10396. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Exploring the thermal limits of malaria transmission in the western Himalaya.探索喜马拉雅山西部疟疾传播的热极限。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Sep 12;12(9):e9278. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9278. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Forest microclimate and composition mediate long-term trends of breeding bird populations.森林小气候和组成成分对繁殖鸟类种群的长期趋势起调节作用。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Nov;28(21):6180-6193. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16353. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
Genetic drift and bottleneck do not influence diversity in Toll-like receptor genes at a small spatial scale in a Himalayan passerine.在喜马拉雅山雀形目鸟类中,遗传漂变和瓶颈效应在小空间尺度上不会影响Toll样受体基因的多样性。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct 15;10(21):12246-12263. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6855. eCollection 2020 Nov.
6
Increased temperature has no consequence for behavioral manipulation despite effects on both partners in the interaction between a crustacean host and a manipulative parasite.尽管甲壳动物宿主和操纵性寄生虫之间的相互作用会影响双方,但温度升高对行为操纵没有影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 15;10(1):11670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68577-z.
7
Keeping pace with climate change in global terrestrial protected areas.紧跟全球陆地保护区的气候变化步伐。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 17;6(25):eaay0814. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay0814. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
Interactive range-limit theory (iRLT): An extension for predicting range shifts.交互式范围极限理论(iRLT):一种预测范围转移的扩展方法。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Apr;89(4):940-954. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13150. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
9
Altitudinal limits of Eastern Himalayan birds are created by competition past and present.东喜马拉雅地区鸟类的海拔极限是由过去和现在的竞争造成的。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0217549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217549. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Latitudinal and climate-driven variation in the strength and nature of biological interactions in New England salt marshes.新英格兰盐沼中生物相互作用的强度和性质随纬度及气候的变化
Oecologia. 2002 Aug;132(3):392-401. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0972-y. Epub 2002 Aug 1.
2
The role of competition, ecotones, and temperature in the elevational distribution of Himalayan birds.喜马拉雅鸟类海拔分布中竞争、生态交错带和温度的作用。
Ecology. 2017 Feb;98(2):337-348. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1669.
3
The importance of agricultural lands for Himalayan birds in winter.农业用地对喜马拉雅山脉鸟类冬季生存的重要性。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):416-426. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12812. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
4
Seasonal and daily climate variation have opposite effects on species elevational range size.季节和日气候变化对物种海拔范围大小有相反的影响。
Science. 2016 Mar 25;351(6280):1437-9. doi: 10.1126/science.aab4119.
5
Niche-tracking migrants and niche-switching residents: evolution of climatic niches in New World warblers (Parulidae).生态位追踪的迁徙者和生态位转换的留鸟:新大陆林莺(森莺科)气候生态位的演变
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 10;283(1824). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2458.
6
Where and When do Species Interactions Set Range Limits?物种相互作用在何时何地设定了分布范围的界限?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Dec;30(12):780-792. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
7
Global variation in thermal tolerances and vulnerability of endotherms to climate change.恒温动物热耐受性的全球差异及其对气候变化的脆弱性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 22;281(1789):20141097. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1097.
8
Niche filling slows the diversification of Himalayan songbirds.生态位填补减缓喜马拉雅山雀的多样化。
Nature. 2014 May 8;509(7499):222-5. doi: 10.1038/nature13272. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Species coexistence and the dynamics of phenotypic evolution in adaptive radiation.物种共存与表型进化的适应性辐射动力学。
Nature. 2014 Feb 20;506(7488):359-63. doi: 10.1038/nature12874. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
10
Does climate limit species richness by limiting individual species' ranges?气候是否通过限制单个物种的分布范围来限制物种丰富度?
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Dec 18;281(1776):20132695. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2695. Print 2014 Feb 7.

温度和竞争相互作用,塑造了喜马拉雅地区的鸟类群落。

Temperature and competition interact to structure Himalayan bird communities.

机构信息

Program in Science, Technology and Environmental Policy, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA

Program in Science, Technology and Environmental Policy, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 14;285(1874). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2593.

DOI:10.1098/rspb.2017.2593
PMID:29514971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5879623/
Abstract

Longstanding theory predicts that competitive interactions set species' range limits in relatively aseasonal, species-rich regions, while temperature limits distributions in more seasonal, species-poor areas. More recent theory holds that species evolve narrow physiological tolerances in aseasonal regions, with temperature being an important determining factor in such zones. We tested how abiotic (temperature) and biotic (competition) factors set range limits and structure bird communities along strong, opposing, temperature-seasonality and species-richness gradients in the Himalayas, in two regions separated by 1500 km. By examining the degree to which seasonal elevational migration conserves year-round thermal niches across species, we show that species in the relatively aseasonal and speciose east are more constrained by temperature compared with species in the highly seasonal west. We further show that seasonality has a profound effect on the strength of competition between congeneric species. Competition appears to be stronger in winter, a period of resource scarcity in the Himalayas, in both the east and the west, with similarly sized eastern species more likely to segregate in thermal niche space in winter. Our results indicate that rather than acting in isolation, abiotic and biotic factors mediate each other to structure ecological communities.

摘要

长期以来的理论预测,在相对非季节性、物种丰富的地区,竞争相互作用会限制物种的分布范围,而在季节性更强、物种较少的地区,温度则限制了物种的分布。最近的理论认为,物种在非季节性地区进化出狭窄的生理耐受范围,而温度是这些区域的一个重要决定因素。我们在喜马拉雅山脉两个相距 1500 公里的地区,沿着强烈的、相反的温度季节性和物种丰富度梯度,检验了非生物(温度)和生物(竞争)因素如何设定物种分布范围并构建鸟类群落。通过研究季节性海拔迁徙在多大程度上保留了物种全年的热生态位,我们表明,与高度季节性的西部相比,相对非季节性和物种丰富的东部物种受温度的限制更大。我们进一步表明,季节性对同种物种之间竞争的强度有深远的影响。在喜马拉雅山脉资源匮乏的冬季,无论是在东部还是西部,竞争似乎都更强,而体型相似的东部物种在冬季更有可能在热生态位空间中分离。我们的研究结果表明,非生物和生物因素不是孤立地起作用,而是相互作用来调节生态群落的结构。