Suppr超能文献

温度和竞争相互作用,塑造了喜马拉雅地区的鸟类群落。

Temperature and competition interact to structure Himalayan bird communities.

机构信息

Program in Science, Technology and Environmental Policy, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA

Program in Science, Technology and Environmental Policy, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 14;285(1874). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2593.

Abstract

Longstanding theory predicts that competitive interactions set species' range limits in relatively aseasonal, species-rich regions, while temperature limits distributions in more seasonal, species-poor areas. More recent theory holds that species evolve narrow physiological tolerances in aseasonal regions, with temperature being an important determining factor in such zones. We tested how abiotic (temperature) and biotic (competition) factors set range limits and structure bird communities along strong, opposing, temperature-seasonality and species-richness gradients in the Himalayas, in two regions separated by 1500 km. By examining the degree to which seasonal elevational migration conserves year-round thermal niches across species, we show that species in the relatively aseasonal and speciose east are more constrained by temperature compared with species in the highly seasonal west. We further show that seasonality has a profound effect on the strength of competition between congeneric species. Competition appears to be stronger in winter, a period of resource scarcity in the Himalayas, in both the east and the west, with similarly sized eastern species more likely to segregate in thermal niche space in winter. Our results indicate that rather than acting in isolation, abiotic and biotic factors mediate each other to structure ecological communities.

摘要

长期以来的理论预测,在相对非季节性、物种丰富的地区,竞争相互作用会限制物种的分布范围,而在季节性更强、物种较少的地区,温度则限制了物种的分布。最近的理论认为,物种在非季节性地区进化出狭窄的生理耐受范围,而温度是这些区域的一个重要决定因素。我们在喜马拉雅山脉两个相距 1500 公里的地区,沿着强烈的、相反的温度季节性和物种丰富度梯度,检验了非生物(温度)和生物(竞争)因素如何设定物种分布范围并构建鸟类群落。通过研究季节性海拔迁徙在多大程度上保留了物种全年的热生态位,我们表明,与高度季节性的西部相比,相对非季节性和物种丰富的东部物种受温度的限制更大。我们进一步表明,季节性对同种物种之间竞争的强度有深远的影响。在喜马拉雅山脉资源匮乏的冬季,无论是在东部还是西部,竞争似乎都更强,而体型相似的东部物种在冬季更有可能在热生态位空间中分离。我们的研究结果表明,非生物和生物因素不是孤立地起作用,而是相互作用来调节生态群落的结构。

相似文献

7
Functional and phylogenetic structure of island bird communities.岛屿鸟类群落的功能和系统发育结构。
J Anim Ecol. 2017 May;86(3):532-542. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12650. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

7
Keeping pace with climate change in global terrestrial protected areas.紧跟全球陆地保护区的气候变化步伐。
Sci Adv. 2020 Jun 17;6(25):eaay0814. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay0814. eCollection 2020 Jun.

本文引用的文献

6
Where and When do Species Interactions Set Range Limits?物种相互作用在何时何地设定了分布范围的界限?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Dec;30(12):780-792. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
Niche filling slows the diversification of Himalayan songbirds.生态位填补减缓喜马拉雅山雀的多样化。
Nature. 2014 May 8;509(7499):222-5. doi: 10.1038/nature13272. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验