Suppr超能文献

三种免疫测定法用于评估实验性暴露于牛支原体的牛血清学状态的性能

The Performance of Three Immune Assays to Assess the Serological Status of Cattle Experimentally Exposed to Mycoplasma bovis.

作者信息

Schibrowski Meghan L, Barnes Tamsin S, Wawegama Nadeeka K, Vance Megan E, Markham Philip F, Mansell Peter D, Marenda Marc S, Kanci Anna, Perez-Casal José, Browning Glenn F, Gibson Justine S, Mahony Timothy J

机构信息

Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.

School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia.

出版信息

Vet Sci. 2018 Mar 8;5(1):27. doi: 10.3390/vetsci5010027.

Abstract

is associated with several clinical syndromes of cattle. Currently, limited information is available on the sensitivity () and specificity () of serological assays used for the detection of -specific antibodies. Consequently, it is difficult to critically evaluate the outcomes of studies that use these assays. Therefore, the current study used bovine sera sourced from exposure studies from three countries to estimate the and of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), BIO K302 and BIO K260, and Western blotting. Western blotting had the highest estimate of 74% (95% confidence interval (CI): 16-98%), compared to the BIO K302: 47% (95% CI: 10-87%) and BIO K260: 28% (95% CI: 1-92%). However, for the BIO K302: 96% (95% CI: 87-99%) and the BIO K260: 100% (95% CI: 93-100%) out-performed Western blotting: 88% (95% CI: 56-98%). Western blotting was the best assay for detecting seroconversion, correctly identifying 61% (95% CI: 29-86%) of exposed animals compared to 35% for BIO K302 (95% CI: 21-54%) and 8% for BIO K260 (95% CI: 0-87%). While none of the methods assessed had high and , the availability of these estimates will aid in the interpretation of studies that use these assays. The results of this study highlight the difficulties encountered when using serology to detect exposure to in cattle.

摘要

与牛的几种临床综合征相关。目前,关于用于检测特异性抗体的血清学检测方法的敏感性()和特异性()的信息有限。因此,很难严格评估使用这些检测方法的研究结果。因此,本研究使用了来自三个国家暴露研究的牛血清,以估计两种商业酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),即BIO K302和BIO K260以及western印迹法的敏感性和特异性。与BIO K302的47%(95%置信区间(CI):10 - 87%)和BIO K260的28%(95% CI:1 - 92%)相比,western印迹法的敏感性估计最高,为74%(95% CI:16 - 98%)。然而,对于特异性,BIO K302为96%(95% CI:87 - 99%),BIO K260为100%(95% CI:93 - 100%),优于western印迹法的88%(95% CI:56 - 98%)。western印迹法是检测血清转化的最佳方法,与BIO K302的35%(95% CI:21 - 54%)和BIO K260的8%(95% CI:0 - 87%)相比,能正确识别61%(95% CI:29 - 86%)的暴露动物。虽然所评估的方法都没有高敏感性和特异性,但这些估计值将有助于解释使用这些检测方法的研究。本研究结果突出了使用血清学检测牛暴露于的困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae93/5876582/7d4f66dcc642/vetsci-05-00027-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验