Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):81-87. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054081. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
To examine how point-of-sale (POS) display bans, tobacco retailer density and tobacco retailer proximity were associated with smoking cessation and relapse in a cohort of smokers in Canada, where provincial POS bans were implemented differentially over time from 2004 to 2010.
Data from the 2005 to 2011 administrations of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Canada Survey, a nationally representative cohort of adult smokers, were linked via residential geocoding with tobacco retailer data to derive for each smoker a measure of retailer density and proximity. An indicator variable identified whether the smoker's province banned POS displays at the time of the interview. Outcomes included cessation for at least 1 month at follow-up among smokers from the previous wave and relapse at follow-up among smokers who had quit at the previous wave. Logistic generalised estimating equation models were used to determine the relationship between living in a province with a POS display ban, tobacco retailer density and tobacco retailer proximity with cessation (n=4388) and relapse (n=866).
Provincial POS display bans were not associated with cessation. In adjusted models, POS display bans were associated with lower odds of relapse which strengthened after adjusting for retailer density and proximity, although results were not statistically significant (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.07, p=0.089). Neither tobacco retailer density nor proximity was associated with cessation or relapse.
Banning POS retail displays shows promise as an additional tool to prevent relapse, although these results need to be confirmed in larger longitudinal studies.
在加拿大的一个吸烟者队列中,检查销售点 (POS) 展示禁令、烟草零售商密度和烟草零售商接近度如何与戒烟和复吸相关联,该队列中,省级 POS 禁令在 2004 年至 2010 年间随着时间的推移而有所不同。
将来自 2005 年至 2011 年加拿大国际烟草控制 (ITC) 调查的、具有全国代表性的成年吸烟者队列的数据,通过居住地点的地理编码与烟草零售商数据进行链接,为每个吸烟者得出一个零售商密度和接近度的度量标准。一个指示变量确定吸烟者所在省份在访谈时是否禁止 POS 展示。结果包括在前一波吸烟者中至少有 1 个月的随访戒烟率和在前一波戒烟者中随访时的复吸率。使用逻辑广义估计方程模型来确定在有 POS 展示禁令的省份生活、烟草零售商密度和烟草零售商接近度与戒烟 (n=4388) 和复吸 (n=866) 的关系。
省级 POS 展示禁令与戒烟无关。在调整后的模型中,POS 展示禁令与较低的复吸几率相关,但在调整了零售商密度和接近度后,这种关联变得更强,尽管结果并不具有统计学意义 (OR 0.66,95%CI 0.41 至 1.07,p=0.089)。烟草零售商密度和接近度均与戒烟或复吸无关。
禁止 POS 零售展示有望成为预防复吸的另一种工具,尽管这些结果需要在更大的纵向研究中得到证实。