Juel Niels Gunnar, Brox Jens I, Hellund Johan C, Merckoll Else, Holte Kristine B, Berg Tore J
Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, 0407, Oslo, Norway.
Skeletal Radiol. 2018 Sep;47(9):1245-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-2923-7. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
In the present study, we evaluate the intra- and interrater agreement of radiological glenohumeral OA using three different classification systems and estimate the prevalence of radiological and clinical glenohumeral OA in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1), for over 45 years and controls (The Dialong study).
We included 102 patients with DM1 (49% women, mean age, 61.9 years) and 73 controls (57% women, mean age, 62.6 years). Anterior-posterior shoulder radiographs were interpreted by two observers applying the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L), Samilson-Prieto (S-P) and Samilson-Prieto Allain (S-PA) classifications.
The interrater agreement was moderate (weighted kappa, 0.46 to 0.48) for all classifications and the intrarater agreement mainly substantial (0.48-0.86) for both observers. The agreed prevalence of radiological OA was 26 and 18% (OR 1.6 (0.8 to 3.3), p = 0.22, 44 and 26% (OR 2.2 (1.2 to 4.2), p = 0.02) and 30 and 17% (OR 2.1 (1.0 to 4.5), p = 0.05) for the K-L, S-P and S-PA classifications respectively in the diabetes and control groups. The prevalence of moderate or severe radiological OA was 1 to 6% and clinical OA 1 to 2% with no difference between the groups.
The prevalence of radiological glenohumeral OA was higher in the diabetes group with the Samilson-Prieto classification systems, but not associated with clinical OA. The interrater agreement was moderate. We recommend the Samilson-Prieto Allain classification for glenohumeral OA to avoid interpretation of osteophytes < 1 mm as OA in patient groups with a low pre-test likelihood of glenohumeral OA.
在本研究中,我们使用三种不同的分类系统评估放射性盂肱关节骨关节炎的评分者间和评分者内一致性,并估计45岁以上1型糖尿病(DM1)患者和对照组(Dialong研究)中放射性和临床盂肱关节骨关节炎的患病率。
我们纳入了102例DM1患者(49%为女性,平均年龄61.9岁)和73例对照组(57%为女性,平均年龄62.6岁)。两位观察者应用凯尔格伦-劳伦斯(K-L)、萨米尔森-普列托(S-P)和萨米尔森-普列托-阿莱恩(S-PA)分类法对肩部前后位X线片进行解读。
所有分类的评分者间一致性为中等(加权kappa值,0.46至0.48),两位观察者的评分者内一致性主要为实质性(0.48 - 0.86)。糖尿病组和对照组中,K-L、S-P和S-PA分类法的放射性骨关节炎一致患病率分别为26%和18%(OR 1.6(0.8至3.3),p = 0.22)、44%和26%(OR 2.2(1.2至4.2),p = 0.02)以及30%和17%(OR 2.1(1.0至4.5),p = 0.05)。中度或重度放射性骨关节炎的患病率为1%至6%,临床骨关节炎患病率为1%至2%,两组之间无差异。
在糖尿病组中,采用萨米尔森-普列托分类系统时放射性盂肱关节骨关节炎的患病率较高,但与临床骨关节炎无关。评分者间一致性为中等。对于盂肱关节骨关节炎,我们推荐使用萨米尔森-普列托-阿莱恩分类法,以避免在盂肱关节骨关节炎预测试验可能性较低的患者群体中将<1毫米的骨赘解读为骨关节炎。