Klinik für Strahlentherapie und spezielle Onkologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Klinik für Neurologie und klinische Neurophysiologie, DIAKOVERE Henriettenstift gGmbH, Marienstr. 72-90, 30171, Hannover, Germany.
J Neurooncol. 2018 Jul;138(3):571-579. doi: 10.1007/s11060-018-2824-6. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
There is no standard treatment available for recurrent high-grade gliomas. This monoinstitutional retrospective analysis evaluates the differences in overall survival and progression-free survival in patients according to the timing of re-irradiation. Patients suffering from a glioblastoma who received re-irradiation for recurrence were evaluated retrospectively. The median overall survival (OS) and the median progression-free survival were compared with different treatment options and within various time periods. From January 2007 until March 2015, 41 patients suffering from recurrent high-grade gliomas received re-irradiation [median dose of 30.6 Gy (range 20-40 Gy) in median 4 Gy fractions (range 1.8-5 Gy)] in our institution after initial postoperative irradiation or combined radiochemotherapy. The OS in this population was 34 months, and the OS after recurrence (OS-R) was 13 months. After diagnosis of recurrence, patients underwent additional surgical resection after a median of 1.2 months, received a second-line systemic therapy after 2.2 months with or without re-irradiation after 5.7 months. Growth of the tumour was assessed 4.3 months after the start of re-irradiation. The OS after the second surgical resection was 12.2 months, 11.7 months after the start of the second-line systemic therapy, and 6.7 months after the start of re-irradiation. The OS-R was not significantly correlated with the start of re-irradiation after a diagnosis of recurrence or the time period after the previous surgery. At this institution, re-irradiation was performed later compared to other treatment options. However, select patients could benefit from irradiation at an earlier time point. A precise time point should still be evaluated on an individual basis due to the patient's diverse conditions.
目前尚无标准治疗方案可用于复发性高级别脑胶质瘤。本单机构回顾性分析根据再放疗时间评估了患者总生存期和无进展生存期的差异。对接受再放疗以治疗复发性脑胶质瘤的患者进行回顾性评估。比较了不同治疗方案和不同时间段的中位总生存期(OS)和中位无进展生存期。2007 年 1 月至 2015 年 3 月,41 例复发性高级别脑胶质瘤患者在我院接受了再放疗[中位剂量为 30.6Gy(范围 20-40Gy),中位 4Gy 分次(范围 1.8-5Gy)],这些患者在初始术后放疗或联合放化疗后发生了复发。该人群的 OS 为 34 个月,复发后的 OS(OS-R)为 13 个月。在确诊复发后,患者中位在 1.2 个月后进行了再次手术切除,2.2 个月后接受了二线系统治疗,在 5.7 个月后接受了或未接受再放疗。在开始再放疗后 4.3 个月评估肿瘤生长情况。第二次手术切除后的 OS 为 12.2 个月,二线系统治疗开始后的 OS 为 11.7 个月,再放疗开始后的 OS 为 6.7 个月。OS-R 与复发后开始再放疗或上次手术后的时间段均无显著相关性。与其他治疗方案相比,该机构的再放疗时间较晚。然而,一些选择的患者可能从更早的时间点开始放疗中获益。由于患者的各种情况不同,仍需根据个体情况评估准确的时间点。