• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能手机作为数字“安全毯”的使用:手机使用和可用性对社会排斥的心理和生理反应的影响。

The Use of Smartphones as a Digital Security Blanket: The Influence of Phone Use and Availability on Psychological and Physiological Responses to Social Exclusion.

机构信息

From the Department of Psychology and Social Behavior (Hunter, Hooker, Pressman), University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; Department of Psychology (Rohleder), Brandeis University, Waltham, MA; and Department of Psychology (Rohleder), Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 2018 May;80(4):345-352. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000568.

DOI:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000568
PMID:29521885
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mobile phones are increasingly becoming a part of the social environment, and when individuals feels excluded during a socially stressful situation, they often retreat to the comfort of their phone to ameliorate the negativity. This study tests whether smartphone presence does, in fact, alter psychological and physiological responses to social stress.

METHODS

Participants (N = 148, 84% female, mean age = 20.4) were subjected to a peer, social-exclusion stressor. Before exclusion, participants were randomized to one of the following three conditions: (1) phone-present with use encouraged, (2) phone-present with use restricted, or (3) no phone access. Saliva samples and self-report data were collected throughout the study to assess salivary alpha amylase (sAA), cortisol, and feelings of exclusion.

RESULTS

Participants in both phone-present conditions reported lower feelings of exclusion compared with individuals who had no access to their phone (F(2,143) = 5.49, p = .005). Multilevel modeling of sAA responses revealed that the individuals in the restricted-phone condition had a significantly different quadratic trajectory after the stressor compared with the phone use (υ = -0.12, z = -2.15, p = .032), and no-phone conditions (υ = -0.14, z = -2.64, p = .008). Specifically, those in the restricted-phone condition showed a decrease in sAA after exclusion, those in the no-phone condition showed a gradual increase, and phone users exhibited little change. Cortisol responses to the stressor did not vary by condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results suggest that the mere presence of a phone (and not necessarily phone use) can buffer against the negative experience and effects of social exclusion.

摘要

目的

手机越来越成为社交环境的一部分,当个体在社交压力情境中感到被排斥时,他们往往会退回到手机的舒适区,以减轻负面情绪。本研究旨在检验智能手机的存在是否确实会改变个体对社交压力的心理和生理反应。

方法

参与者(N=148,84%为女性,平均年龄=20.4)经历了一种同伴社交排斥压力源。在排斥之前,参与者被随机分配到以下三种条件之一:(1)手机在场并鼓励使用,(2)手机在场但限制使用,或(3)无法使用手机。在整个研究过程中收集唾液样本和自我报告数据,以评估唾液α-淀粉酶(sAA)、皮质醇和排斥感。

结果

与无法使用手机的个体相比,处于两种手机在场条件下的参与者报告的排斥感较低(F(2,143)=5.49,p=0.005)。sAA 反应的多层次模型显示,在应激源后,限制手机使用条件下的个体具有明显不同的二次轨迹,与手机使用(υ=-0.12,z=-2.15,p=0.032)和无手机条件(υ=-0.14,z=-2.64,p=0.008)不同。具体来说,限制手机使用条件下的个体在排斥后 sAA 降低,无手机条件下的个体逐渐增加,而手机使用者则几乎没有变化。皮质醇对压力源的反应不受条件影响。

结论

综上所述,这些结果表明,手机的存在(而不仅仅是手机使用)可以缓冲社交排斥的负面体验和影响。

相似文献

1
The Use of Smartphones as a Digital Security Blanket: The Influence of Phone Use and Availability on Psychological and Physiological Responses to Social Exclusion.智能手机作为数字“安全毯”的使用:手机使用和可用性对社会排斥的心理和生理反应的影响。
Psychosom Med. 2018 May;80(4):345-352. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000568.
2
Endocrine and emotional response to exclusion among women and men; cortisol, salivary alpha amylase, and mood.男女对被排斥的内分泌和情绪反应;皮质醇、唾液α淀粉酶与情绪
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2017 May;30(3):253-263. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2016.1269323. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
3
Hyper-responsiveness to acute stress, emotional problems and poorer memory in former preterm children.former preterm children. 这部分原文可能有误,推测应为“former preterm infants”,以下是纠正错误后翻译的结果: 前早产儿对急性应激反应过度、存在情绪问题且记忆力较差。
Stress. 2014 Sep;17(5):389-99. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2014.949667.
4
Physiological stress reactivity and empathy following social exclusion: a test of the defensive emotional analgesia hypothesis.社会排斥后的生理应激反应与同理心:防御性情绪镇痛假说的检验
Soc Neurosci. 2014;9(5):504-13. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2014.929533. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
5
Does the arrival index predict physiological stress reactivity in children.到达指数能否预测儿童的生理应激反应性?
Stress. 2014 Sep;17(5):383-8. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2014.936004. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
6
Investigation into the cross-correlation of salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase responses to psychological stress.探讨唾液皮质醇和α-淀粉酶对心理应激的交叉相关性。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2011 Oct;36(9):1294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.02.018. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
7
Salivary α-amylase and cortisol responsiveness following electrical stimulation stress in panic disorder patients.惊恐障碍患者电刺激应激后唾液 α-淀粉酶和皮质醇的反应性。
Neurosci Res. 2012 May;73(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2012.01.006. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
8
Gender differences in automatic thoughts and cortisol and alpha-amylase responses to acute psychosocial stress in patients with obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.强迫型人格障碍患者自动思维、皮质醇及α-淀粉酶对急性心理社会应激反应的性别差异。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 1;217:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.057. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
9
Impact of physical fitness on salivary stress markers in sedentary to low-active young to middle-aged men.体能对久坐至低活动水平的青年至中年男性唾液应激标志物的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Jun;68:14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
10
Person-centered examination of salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase responses to psychosocial stress: Links to preadolescent behavioral functioning and coping.以个体为中心对唾液皮质醇和α-淀粉酶对应激心理社会压力的反应进行的研究:与青春期前行为功能和应对方式的关联。
Biol Psychol. 2018 Feb;132:143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
What Personality Dimensions May Influence the Risk of Smartphone Addiction in Children?哪些人格维度可能影响儿童智能手机成瘾的风险?
Children (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;12(3):258. doi: 10.3390/children12030258.
2
Effect of task nature during short digital deprivation on time perception and psychophysiological state.短期数字剥夺期间任务性质对时间感知和心理生理状态的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 26;15(1):10469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94316-3.
3
Human and digital ecosystems in the modern household.现代家庭中的人类与数字生态系统。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 6;15:1426804. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1426804. eCollection 2024.
4
A Humane Social Learning-Informed Metaverse: Cultivating Positive Technology Experiences in Digital Learning Environments.人性化社会学习启发的元宇宙:在数字学习环境中培养积极的技术体验。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2024 Jan;27(1):47-56. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2023.0001.
5
Effect of receiving mobile text messages on cortisol concentrations in students at the University of the Free State.接收手机短信对自由州大学学生皮质醇浓度的影响。
Health SA. 2023 Feb 23;28:2064. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2064. eCollection 2023.
6
Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Profiles of Multi-Media Use for Risk Communication in the General Population.大众人群中多媒体用于风险交流的社会人口学和心理社会学特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 6;19(19):12777. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912777.
7
Stress can lead to an increase in smartphone use in the context of texting while walking.压力会导致在走路时发短信的情况下智能手机使用量增加。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 8;13:760107. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.760107. eCollection 2022.
8
Phubbing among Lebanese young adults: Scale validation and association with mental health (depression, anxiety, and stress).黎巴嫩年轻人中的低头族现象:量表验证及其与心理健康(抑郁、焦虑和压力)的关联
Curr Psychol. 2022 Apr 26:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03104-z.
9
A week during COVID-19: Online social interactions are associated with greater connection and more stress.新冠疫情期间的一周:线上社交互动与更强的联系感和更多的压力相关。
Comput Hum Behav Rep. 2021 Aug-Dec;4:100133. doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100133. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
10
Problematic smartphone use and affective temperaments among Lebanese young adults: scale validation and mediating role of self-esteem.黎巴嫩年轻人智能手机使用问题与情感气质:量表验证及自尊的中介作用。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 8;9(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00638-y.